Investor–firm interactions versus investor–investor interactions: Which enhances investor learning better?

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Libo Yin , Xiaoye Zhu
{"title":"Investor–firm interactions versus investor–investor interactions: Which enhances investor learning better?","authors":"Libo Yin ,&nbsp;Xiaoye Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the impact of different forms of information interaction on investor learning. The empirical results show that investor–firm interactions are positively associated with the investor learning effect, whereas investor–investor interactions exert a negative impact. The mechanism analysis suggests that acquiring information from the supply side (firms) rather than the demand side (investors) reduces noise content, investor disagreement, and crash risk, thereby enhancing investor learning. This study enhances our understanding of how improving the market information environment, refining corporate disclosure practices, and strengthening investor protection can enhance investor learning in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 104285"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925003722","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of different forms of information interaction on investor learning. The empirical results show that investor–firm interactions are positively associated with the investor learning effect, whereas investor–investor interactions exert a negative impact. The mechanism analysis suggests that acquiring information from the supply side (firms) rather than the demand side (investors) reduces noise content, investor disagreement, and crash risk, thereby enhancing investor learning. This study enhances our understanding of how improving the market information environment, refining corporate disclosure practices, and strengthening investor protection can enhance investor learning in China.
投资者-公司互动与投资者-投资者互动:哪个能更好地促进投资者学习?
本文研究了不同形式的信息交互对投资者学习的影响。实证结果表明,投资者-企业互动对投资者学习效应有正向影响,而投资者-投资者互动对投资者学习效应有负向影响。机制分析表明,从供给侧(企业)获取信息而不是从需求侧(投资者)获取信息,降低了噪音含量、投资者分歧和崩溃风险,从而增强了投资者的学习能力。本研究加深了我们对改善市场信息环境、完善公司信息披露规范和加强投资者保护如何促进中国投资者学习的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信