Operations locked-in amid geopolitical conflicts: A study of the 2022 Russo–Ukrainian war

IF 8.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Wenjun Shu , Di Fan , Xiao Zhang , Guanlin Li
{"title":"Operations locked-in amid geopolitical conflicts: A study of the 2022 Russo–Ukrainian war","authors":"Wenjun Shu ,&nbsp;Di Fan ,&nbsp;Xiao Zhang ,&nbsp;Guanlin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rise in geopolitical conflicts has created unprecedented risks for firms, particularly in their operations and supply chains. In the wake of the 2022 Russo–Ukrainian War, many multinational enterprises have faced significant challenges in managing these risks, with some becoming “locked-in” to such high-risk regions as Russia. This study explores how firms manage operations under geopolitical conflict, with a focus on those unable to fully exit risky markets. Using a sample of U.S.-listed firms maintaining operations in Russia following the invasion, our propensity score matching and difference-in-differences analysis demonstrates that these firms have experienced undermined profitability. However, we find mixed moderating effects of different types of market dependencies. Firms with subsidiaries and suppliers in Russia experienced a more severe decline in profitability, while having customers in Russia served to mitigate this impact. Moreover, we explore the role of slack resources in alleviating the adverse effects, showing that firms with more operating and unborrowed slacks better maintained their financial performance. The findings contribute to the operations and supply chain management literature on geopolitical risks and resource dependence theory, while offering managerial implications for navigating operations under geopolitical conflicts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 104147"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525001887","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise in geopolitical conflicts has created unprecedented risks for firms, particularly in their operations and supply chains. In the wake of the 2022 Russo–Ukrainian War, many multinational enterprises have faced significant challenges in managing these risks, with some becoming “locked-in” to such high-risk regions as Russia. This study explores how firms manage operations under geopolitical conflict, with a focus on those unable to fully exit risky markets. Using a sample of U.S.-listed firms maintaining operations in Russia following the invasion, our propensity score matching and difference-in-differences analysis demonstrates that these firms have experienced undermined profitability. However, we find mixed moderating effects of different types of market dependencies. Firms with subsidiaries and suppliers in Russia experienced a more severe decline in profitability, while having customers in Russia served to mitigate this impact. Moreover, we explore the role of slack resources in alleviating the adverse effects, showing that firms with more operating and unborrowed slacks better maintained their financial performance. The findings contribute to the operations and supply chain management literature on geopolitical risks and resource dependence theory, while offering managerial implications for navigating operations under geopolitical conflicts.
地缘政治冲突中的军事行动:对2022年俄乌战争的研究
地缘政治冲突的加剧给企业带来了前所未有的风险,尤其是在企业的运营和供应链方面。在2022年俄乌战争之后,许多跨国企业在管理这些风险方面面临着重大挑战,其中一些企业被“锁定”在俄罗斯等高风险地区。本研究探讨了公司如何在地缘政治冲突下管理业务,重点关注那些无法完全退出风险市场的公司。使用入侵后在俄罗斯维持运营的美国上市公司样本,我们的倾向得分匹配和差异分析表明,这些公司的盈利能力受到了损害。然而,我们发现不同类型的市场依赖的调节作用是混合的。在俄罗斯拥有子公司和供应商的公司的盈利能力下降更为严重,而在俄罗斯拥有客户则有助于减轻这种影响。此外,我们还探讨了闲置资源在缓解负面影响中的作用,结果表明,拥有更多经营和未借闲置资源的企业能够更好地维持其财务绩效。研究结果有助于地缘政治风险和资源依赖理论的运营和供应链管理文献,同时为地缘政治冲突下的运营导航提供管理启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信