Benchmarking hydration, navel health, and transfer of passive immunity in surplus dairy calves

IF 2.2
Ting-Yu Cheng , Jessica A. Pempek , David L. Renaud , Kathryn L. Proudfoot , Zachary England , Devon J. Wilson , Gregory Habing
{"title":"Benchmarking hydration, navel health, and transfer of passive immunity in surplus dairy calves","authors":"Ting-Yu Cheng ,&nbsp;Jessica A. Pempek ,&nbsp;David L. Renaud ,&nbsp;Kathryn L. Proudfoot ,&nbsp;Zachary England ,&nbsp;Devon J. Wilson ,&nbsp;Gregory Habing","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Surplus dairy calves, or calves that are not used to replace the milking herd, are often sold within the first week of life and can sometimes receive suboptimal early-life care. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of delivering benchmarking reports to source dairy farms on the health of subsequent surplus calf cohorts. Briefly, 10 farms were first blocked by herd size category, and within each block, farms were alternately assigned to intervention and control in descending order of the previously measured proportion of calves with adequate passive transfer immunity (i.e., ≥5.8 g/dL total serum protein). After the initial randomization, 3 additional farms were enrolled by convenience to increase the statistical power, and one farm was assigned to the intervention group. Overall, 13 dairy farms were recruited and assigned to intervention (n = 6) and control (n = 7) groups. The intervention group received health benchmarking reports of surplus calves delivered to calf dealers halfway through the study period, whereas the control group received no reports. Between May 2021 and June 2022, a total of 282 and 371 calves enrolled from intervention and control farms, respectively, were assessed for hydration, navel health, and transfer of passive immunity (TPI). In brief, hydration was evaluated using the skin tent test and a 4-point scale, and navel health was assessed based on the width of umbilical cords using a 4-point scale. The TPI was assessed based on the concentration of total serum protein. In November 2021, benchmarking reports containing health metrics of calves from 13 farms during the first 6 mo of the study were delivered to 6 intervention farms. Differences in health metrics of subsequent surplus calf cohorts between intervention and control farms were investigated using generalized linear mixed models specified to recognize “farm” as the experimental unit. Prevalence of dehydration was decreased in calves from intervention farms compared with control farms after receiving the benchmarking reports (odds ratio = 0.19, 95% CI = [0.04, 0.90] %). There was no evidence of any differences in navel inflammation or failure in TPI associated with benchmarking reports. Results suggest delivering benchmarking reports to dairy producers may improve hydration in surplus calves. Nevertheless, additional methods should be investigated to improve calf health within the surplus calf production chain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"6 3","pages":"Pages 383-388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910225000250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surplus dairy calves, or calves that are not used to replace the milking herd, are often sold within the first week of life and can sometimes receive suboptimal early-life care. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of delivering benchmarking reports to source dairy farms on the health of subsequent surplus calf cohorts. Briefly, 10 farms were first blocked by herd size category, and within each block, farms were alternately assigned to intervention and control in descending order of the previously measured proportion of calves with adequate passive transfer immunity (i.e., ≥5.8 g/dL total serum protein). After the initial randomization, 3 additional farms were enrolled by convenience to increase the statistical power, and one farm was assigned to the intervention group. Overall, 13 dairy farms were recruited and assigned to intervention (n = 6) and control (n = 7) groups. The intervention group received health benchmarking reports of surplus calves delivered to calf dealers halfway through the study period, whereas the control group received no reports. Between May 2021 and June 2022, a total of 282 and 371 calves enrolled from intervention and control farms, respectively, were assessed for hydration, navel health, and transfer of passive immunity (TPI). In brief, hydration was evaluated using the skin tent test and a 4-point scale, and navel health was assessed based on the width of umbilical cords using a 4-point scale. The TPI was assessed based on the concentration of total serum protein. In November 2021, benchmarking reports containing health metrics of calves from 13 farms during the first 6 mo of the study were delivered to 6 intervention farms. Differences in health metrics of subsequent surplus calf cohorts between intervention and control farms were investigated using generalized linear mixed models specified to recognize “farm” as the experimental unit. Prevalence of dehydration was decreased in calves from intervention farms compared with control farms after receiving the benchmarking reports (odds ratio = 0.19, 95% CI = [0.04, 0.90] %). There was no evidence of any differences in navel inflammation or failure in TPI associated with benchmarking reports. Results suggest delivering benchmarking reports to dairy producers may improve hydration in surplus calves. Nevertheless, additional methods should be investigated to improve calf health within the surplus calf production chain.
基准水合作用,肚脐健康,和转移被动免疫过剩的奶牛
多余的奶牛,或者不是用来代替挤奶群的小牛,通常在出生后的第一周内被出售,有时会得到不理想的早期护理。本研究的目的是评估向来源奶牛场提供基准报告对随后剩余小牛群体健康的影响。简单地说,首先按畜群规模类别对10个猪场进行分组,在每个分组中,按照先前测量的具有足够被动转移免疫(即血清总蛋白≥5.8 g/dL)的小牛比例由高到低依次将猪场分为干预和控制两组。在初始随机化后,为了方便起见,增加了3个养殖场的入组,其中1个养殖场被分配到干预组。总共招募了13个奶牛场,并将其分配到干预组(n = 6)和对照组(n = 7)。干预组在研究期间中途收到多余小牛交付给小牛经销商的健康基准报告,而对照组没有收到报告。在2021年5月至2022年6月期间,分别从干预农场和对照农场招募了282头和371头小牛,对水合作用、肚脐健康和被动免疫转移(TPI)进行了评估。简而言之,利用皮肤帐篷试验和4分制评估水合作用,并根据脐带宽度采用4分制评估肚脐健康。以血清总蛋白浓度评价TPI。2021年11月,在研究的前6个月,向6个干预农场提交了包含13个农场小牛健康指标的基准报告。使用广义线性混合模型研究了干预农场和对照农场之间后续剩余小牛队列的健康指标差异,该模型指定将“农场”作为实验单位。收到基准报告后,干预农场的小牛脱水率与对照农场相比有所下降(优势比= 0.19,95% CI =[0.04, 0.90] %)。没有证据表明与基准报告相关的脐部炎症或TPI失败有任何差异。结果表明,向乳制品生产商提供基准报告可能会改善过剩小牛的水合作用。然而,应该研究其他方法来改善剩余犊牛生产链中的犊牛健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信