Investigating gut permeability in neonatal calves with diarrhea: A case-control study

Luiza S. Zakia , Diego E. Gomez , Michael A. Steele , Peter D. Constable , Stephen J. LeBlanc , David L. Renaud
{"title":"Investigating gut permeability in neonatal calves with diarrhea: A case-control study","authors":"Luiza S. Zakia ,&nbsp;Diego E. Gomez ,&nbsp;Michael A. Steele ,&nbsp;Peter D. Constable ,&nbsp;Stephen J. LeBlanc ,&nbsp;David L. Renaud","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this case-control study was to assess gut permeability, measured through Cr-EDTA recovery, in healthy and diarrheic neonatal calves. The study was conducted at a commercial calf-rearing facility, where fecal consistency was monitored twice daily. Calves were categorized as diarrheic if they had runny or watery feces, whereas those with normal fecal consistency, neutrophil count, and physical exam findings were considered healthy controls. Gut permeability assessment (Cr-EDTA: 0.1 g/kg BW administered orally 2 h after milk feeding) and blood bacterial culture were performed 24 h after onset of diarrhea. Plasma Cr concentration was determined using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Kruskal-Wallis tests, followed by Dunn's post hoc test, were used to compare Cr concentrations between groups. The study included 12 healthy calves and 11 diarrheic calves, with 5 diarrheic calves having bacteremia. Diarrheic calves had greater median (interquartile range) plasma Cr concentrations than healthy calves at 2 h (1.76 [0.92–2.34] mg/L vs. 0.59 [0.48–1.19] mg/L) and 4 h (2.07 [1.57–2.51] mg/L vs. 0.92 [0.77–1.66] mg/L) postadministration, respectively. Both bacteremic and nonbacteremic calves with diarrhea had greater plasma Cr concentrations at 2 h compared with healthy calves (bacteremic: 1.96 [1.76–2.03] mg/L; nonbacteremic: 1.42 [0.78–2.34] mg/L), but there was no difference between bacteremic and nonbacteremic calves. At 4 h postadministration, both bacteremic (2.00 [1.67–2.07] mg/L) and nonbacteremic (2.45 [1.57–3.66] mg/L) diarrheic calves had greater plasma Cr concentrations than healthy calves, with no difference observed between bacteremic and nonbacteremic groups. This study suggests an association between diarrhea and increased gut permeability in neonatal calves. Further studies are required to compare gut permeability in a larger cohort of bacteremic and nonbacteremic diarrheic neonatal calves.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"6 3","pages":"Pages 350-355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910225000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this case-control study was to assess gut permeability, measured through Cr-EDTA recovery, in healthy and diarrheic neonatal calves. The study was conducted at a commercial calf-rearing facility, where fecal consistency was monitored twice daily. Calves were categorized as diarrheic if they had runny or watery feces, whereas those with normal fecal consistency, neutrophil count, and physical exam findings were considered healthy controls. Gut permeability assessment (Cr-EDTA: 0.1 g/kg BW administered orally 2 h after milk feeding) and blood bacterial culture were performed 24 h after onset of diarrhea. Plasma Cr concentration was determined using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Kruskal-Wallis tests, followed by Dunn's post hoc test, were used to compare Cr concentrations between groups. The study included 12 healthy calves and 11 diarrheic calves, with 5 diarrheic calves having bacteremia. Diarrheic calves had greater median (interquartile range) plasma Cr concentrations than healthy calves at 2 h (1.76 [0.92–2.34] mg/L vs. 0.59 [0.48–1.19] mg/L) and 4 h (2.07 [1.57–2.51] mg/L vs. 0.92 [0.77–1.66] mg/L) postadministration, respectively. Both bacteremic and nonbacteremic calves with diarrhea had greater plasma Cr concentrations at 2 h compared with healthy calves (bacteremic: 1.96 [1.76–2.03] mg/L; nonbacteremic: 1.42 [0.78–2.34] mg/L), but there was no difference between bacteremic and nonbacteremic calves. At 4 h postadministration, both bacteremic (2.00 [1.67–2.07] mg/L) and nonbacteremic (2.45 [1.57–3.66] mg/L) diarrheic calves had greater plasma Cr concentrations than healthy calves, with no difference observed between bacteremic and nonbacteremic groups. This study suggests an association between diarrhea and increased gut permeability in neonatal calves. Further studies are required to compare gut permeability in a larger cohort of bacteremic and nonbacteremic diarrheic neonatal calves.
调查新生儿犊牛腹泻的肠道通透性:一项病例对照研究
本病例对照研究的目的是通过Cr-EDTA恢复来评估健康和腹泻新生儿犊牛的肠道通透性。这项研究是在一个商业小牛饲养设施进行的,每天两次监测粪便的稠度。如果犊牛的粪便呈流状或水样,则被归类为腹泻,而那些粪便浓度、中性粒细胞计数和体检结果正常的犊牛则被视为健康对照。腹泻发生24 h后进行肠通透性评估(Cr-EDTA: 0.1 g/kg BW,在喂奶后2 h口服)和血液细菌培养。采用电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定血浆铬浓度。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验,随后采用Dunn事后检验比较组间Cr浓度。该研究包括12头健康犊牛和11头腹泻犊牛,其中5头腹泻犊牛患有菌血症。腹泻犊牛在给药后2 h (1.76 [0.92 - 2.34] mg/L vs. 0.59 [0.48-1.19] mg/L)和4 h (2.07 [1.57-2.51] mg/L vs. 0.92 [0.77-1.66] mg/L)血浆Cr浓度中位数(四分位数范围)高于健康犊牛。与健康犊牛相比,腹泻菌血症犊牛和非菌血症犊牛在2 h时血浆Cr浓度均较高(菌血症:1.96 [1.76-2.03]mg/L;非菌血症:1.42 [0.78-2.34]mg/L),但菌血症犊牛与非菌血症犊牛之间无差异。在给药后4小时,菌血症(2.00 [1.67-2.07]mg/L)和非菌血症(2.45 [1.57-3.66]mg/L)腹泻犊牛的血浆Cr浓度均高于健康犊牛,但菌血症组和非菌血症组之间无差异。这项研究表明,在新生儿犊牛腹泻和增加肠道通透性之间的关联。需要进一步的研究来比较更大的菌血症和非菌血症腹泻新生儿犊牛的肠道通透性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信