Association between pica practice, oral health, and cariogenic microorganisms of US pregnant women: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Yan Wu , Jin Xiao , Noha Rashwan , Abigail Morrissey , Dina Yousif , Nisreen Al Jallad , Kevin Fiscella , TongTong Wu , Brenda A.Z. Abu
{"title":"Association between pica practice, oral health, and cariogenic microorganisms of US pregnant women: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Yan Wu ,&nbsp;Jin Xiao ,&nbsp;Noha Rashwan ,&nbsp;Abigail Morrissey ,&nbsp;Dina Yousif ,&nbsp;Nisreen Al Jallad ,&nbsp;Kevin Fiscella ,&nbsp;TongTong Wu ,&nbsp;Brenda A.Z. Abu","doi":"10.1016/j.archoralbio.2025.106277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the effects of pica practices during pregnancy on oral health risks and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted among pregnant women in New York. Demographic, medical history and oral hygiene practice data were collected using validated questionnaires. Comprehensive oral examinations included caries and periodontal status (plaque index and bleeding on probing). Clinical samples (saliva, plaque, and pica substances obtained from participants) were processed to assess the carriage of cariogenic microorganisms (<em>Streptococcus mutans</em> and <em>Candida</em> species) using culturing-dependent and -independent methods. We statistically compared oral clinical and microbial outcomes of pica and non-pica participants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 20 women enrolled (8 (40 %) with pica and 12 (60 %) without pica), the mean gestational age was 25.55 ± 8.82 weeks. <em>Candida</em> species were detected in 25 % of pica samples (n = 2), predominantly from ice samples. The pica group exhibited poorer oral health conditions, showing more decayed-missing-filled teeth and surfaces than the non-pica counterparts (<em>p</em> = 0.016). Although not statistically significant, salivary carriage of <em>C. albicans</em> was 2.8 times higher in women with pica compared to those without (3.3 ± 5.7 × 10<sup>3</sup> CFU/ml versus 1.2 ± 3.8 × 10<sup>3</sup> CFU/ml in non-pica, <em>p</em> = 0.093). Women with pica reported markedly higher prevalence of anemia (50 %) compared to non-pica participants (8.3 %) (<em>p</em> = 0.035).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pica practices were associated with maternal oral health risks, imploring that clinicians manage pica behaviors to mitigate oral diseases during pregnancy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8288,"journal":{"name":"Archives of oral biology","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 106277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of oral biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003996925001050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effects of pica practices during pregnancy on oral health risks and outcomes.

Design

A cross-sectional study was conducted among pregnant women in New York. Demographic, medical history and oral hygiene practice data were collected using validated questionnaires. Comprehensive oral examinations included caries and periodontal status (plaque index and bleeding on probing). Clinical samples (saliva, plaque, and pica substances obtained from participants) were processed to assess the carriage of cariogenic microorganisms (Streptococcus mutans and Candida species) using culturing-dependent and -independent methods. We statistically compared oral clinical and microbial outcomes of pica and non-pica participants.

Results

Among 20 women enrolled (8 (40 %) with pica and 12 (60 %) without pica), the mean gestational age was 25.55 ± 8.82 weeks. Candida species were detected in 25 % of pica samples (n = 2), predominantly from ice samples. The pica group exhibited poorer oral health conditions, showing more decayed-missing-filled teeth and surfaces than the non-pica counterparts (p = 0.016). Although not statistically significant, salivary carriage of C. albicans was 2.8 times higher in women with pica compared to those without (3.3 ± 5.7 × 103 CFU/ml versus 1.2 ± 3.8 × 103 CFU/ml in non-pica, p = 0.093). Women with pica reported markedly higher prevalence of anemia (50 %) compared to non-pica participants (8.3 %) (p = 0.035).

Conclusions

Pica practices were associated with maternal oral health risks, imploring that clinicians manage pica behaviors to mitigate oral diseases during pregnancy.
美国孕妇异食癖、口腔健康和致龋齿微生物之间的关系:一项横断面研究
目的探讨孕期异食癖对口腔健康风险及预后的影响。设计在纽约的孕妇中进行了一项横断面研究。采用有效问卷收集人口统计、病史和口腔卫生习惯数据。综合口腔检查包括龋齿和牙周状况(菌斑指数和探诊出血)。临床样本(从参与者获得的唾液、斑块和异食癖物质)处理后,使用培养依赖性和非培养依赖性方法评估致龋微生物(变形链球菌和念珠菌)的携带情况。我们统计比较异食癖和非异食癖参与者的口腔临床和微生物结果。结果入选的20名女性中,有异食癖的8名(40 %),无异食癖的12名(60 %),平均胎龄为25.55 ± 8.82周。在25 %的异食癖样品中检出念珠菌(n = 2),主要来自冰样。异食癖组表现出较差的口腔健康状况,与非异食癖组相比,出现更多的牙齿和表面蛀牙缺失(p = 0.016)。虽然没有统计学意义,但患有异食癖的女性唾液中白色念珠菌的携带量是没有异食癖的女性的2.8倍(3.3 ± 5.7 × 103 CFU/ml与1.2 ± 3.8 × 103 CFU/ml相比,p = 0.093)。异食癖女性报告的贫血患病率(50 %)明显高于非异食癖参与者(8.3 %)(p = 0.035)。结论异食癖行为与孕妇口腔健康风险相关,提示临床医生应控制异食癖行为以减轻妊娠期口腔疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of oral biology
Archives of oral biology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Archives of Oral Biology is an international journal which aims to publish papers of the highest scientific quality in the oral and craniofacial sciences. The journal is particularly interested in research which advances knowledge in the mechanisms of craniofacial development and disease, including: Cell and molecular biology Molecular genetics Immunology Pathogenesis Cellular microbiology Embryology Syndromology Forensic dentistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信