Efficacy of artificial intelligence in radiographic dental age estimation of patients undergoing dental maturation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
{"title":"Efficacy of artificial intelligence in radiographic dental age estimation of patients undergoing dental maturation: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Soheil Shahbazi , Saharnaz Esmaeili , Shahab Kavousinejad , Farnaz Younessian , Mohammad Behnaz","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2025.101010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dental age (DA) estimation, crucial for appropriate orthodontic and paediatric treatment planning, traditionally relies on the analysis of developmental stages of teeth. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly employed for DA estimation through dental radiographs. The current study aimed to systematically review the literature on the application of AI models for radiographic DA estimation among subjects undergoing dental maturation.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>The electronic search was conducted through five databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, in July 2024. The search sought studies relying on AI models for DA estimation based on dental radiographs. Data were analysed using STATA software V.14 and heterogeneity was evaluated using I-squared statistics. A random-effects model was employed for meta-analysis. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot, Egger's test, Begg's test, and the trim-and-fill method. Heterogeneity was evaluated with a Galbraith plot, and sensitivity analysis tested robustness.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen studies were deemed eligible for qualitative synthesis, seven of which were included in the meta-analysis. The mean absolute error varied from 0.6915 to 12.04, with accuracy between 0.404 and 0.959. Sensitivity ranged from 0.42 to 1.00, specificity ranged from 0.8014 to 0.982, and positive predictive value ranged from 0.43 to 0.90. The pooled accuracy of seven studies equalled 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79–0.91).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The present findings support the effectiveness of AI models in DA estimation of individuals under 25 years old based on their dental radiographs. However, further studies with larger sample sizes for both test and training datasets are suggested to validate the reliability and clinical applicability of AI in DA estimation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"23 4","pages":"Article 101010"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722725000452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Dental age (DA) estimation, crucial for appropriate orthodontic and paediatric treatment planning, traditionally relies on the analysis of developmental stages of teeth. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly employed for DA estimation through dental radiographs. The current study aimed to systematically review the literature on the application of AI models for radiographic DA estimation among subjects undergoing dental maturation.
Material and methods
The electronic search was conducted through five databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, in July 2024. The search sought studies relying on AI models for DA estimation based on dental radiographs. Data were analysed using STATA software V.14 and heterogeneity was evaluated using I-squared statistics. A random-effects model was employed for meta-analysis. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot, Egger's test, Begg's test, and the trim-and-fill method. Heterogeneity was evaluated with a Galbraith plot, and sensitivity analysis tested robustness.
Results
Thirteen studies were deemed eligible for qualitative synthesis, seven of which were included in the meta-analysis. The mean absolute error varied from 0.6915 to 12.04, with accuracy between 0.404 and 0.959. Sensitivity ranged from 0.42 to 1.00, specificity ranged from 0.8014 to 0.982, and positive predictive value ranged from 0.43 to 0.90. The pooled accuracy of seven studies equalled 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79–0.91).
Conclusion
The present findings support the effectiveness of AI models in DA estimation of individuals under 25 years old based on their dental radiographs. However, further studies with larger sample sizes for both test and training datasets are suggested to validate the reliability and clinical applicability of AI in DA estimation.
期刊介绍:
Une revue de référence dans le domaine de orthodontie et des disciplines frontières Your reference in dentofacial orthopedics International Orthodontics adresse aux orthodontistes, aux dentistes, aux stomatologistes, aux chirurgiens maxillo-faciaux et aux plasticiens de la face, ainsi quà leurs assistant(e)s. International Orthodontics is addressed to orthodontists, dentists, stomatologists, maxillofacial surgeons and facial plastic surgeons, as well as their assistants.