{"title":"Developing the Narrating Identity Questionnaire: A measure of beneficial self-integration and change","authors":"Shawn Timothy Douglas","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present research introduces the Narrating Identity Questionnaire (NIQ), a new measure designed to capture how literary reading can temporally integrate self and other in autobiographical memory, distinguishing productive self-perceptual depth from rumination. The NIQ was developed and validated across three studies with university students. In Study 1, an initial NIQ item pool was administered after a meaningful literary reading experience, and exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors: Memory Transformation, Poignant Bivalent Self-Understanding, and Ruminative Separation and Isolation. In Study 2, the factor structure was cross-validated under a different questionnaire order to test for order effects, and in Study 3, it was confirmed with an added general metaphor comprehension task. The NIQ demonstrated adequate internal consistency and a stable three-factor structure across studies. Importantly, expressive engagement with a text (e.g., deeply identifying with metaphoric content) strongly predicted increased self-understanding (β ≈ 0.70, p < .001) and also some ruminative thought (p < .01), whereas integrative engagement (e.g., taking an analytical perspective on the text) did not directly predict either outcome (βs ∼ 0, n.s.). Expressive engagement accounted for a large portion of variance in self-understanding outcomes (approximately 45–60 %; 95 % CI of β [0.40, 0.98] in Study 1). Although integrative engagement did not directly predict rumination, group-level comparisons indicated a buffering effect: the sample with an added integrative task showed significantly lower rumination scores (M = 2.54) than the original sample (M = 3.21; difference ∼0.67 on a 5-point scale, 95 % CI [0.51, 0.83], p < .001, Cohen's d ≈ 0.76). Together, these findings support the NIQ's capacity to distinguish between healthy self-perceptual depth and maladaptive rumination following literary reading. The discussion highlights theoretical implications for narrative identity development, the dual role of expressive reading in fostering insight versus rumination, and the potential of the NIQ for future research and practical applications. Key strengths, such as the multi-study design and integration of literary theory with psychological measurement, are discussed alongside limitations including sample characteristics and the need for broader validation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 101165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X25000212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present research introduces the Narrating Identity Questionnaire (NIQ), a new measure designed to capture how literary reading can temporally integrate self and other in autobiographical memory, distinguishing productive self-perceptual depth from rumination. The NIQ was developed and validated across three studies with university students. In Study 1, an initial NIQ item pool was administered after a meaningful literary reading experience, and exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors: Memory Transformation, Poignant Bivalent Self-Understanding, and Ruminative Separation and Isolation. In Study 2, the factor structure was cross-validated under a different questionnaire order to test for order effects, and in Study 3, it was confirmed with an added general metaphor comprehension task. The NIQ demonstrated adequate internal consistency and a stable three-factor structure across studies. Importantly, expressive engagement with a text (e.g., deeply identifying with metaphoric content) strongly predicted increased self-understanding (β ≈ 0.70, p < .001) and also some ruminative thought (p < .01), whereas integrative engagement (e.g., taking an analytical perspective on the text) did not directly predict either outcome (βs ∼ 0, n.s.). Expressive engagement accounted for a large portion of variance in self-understanding outcomes (approximately 45–60 %; 95 % CI of β [0.40, 0.98] in Study 1). Although integrative engagement did not directly predict rumination, group-level comparisons indicated a buffering effect: the sample with an added integrative task showed significantly lower rumination scores (M = 2.54) than the original sample (M = 3.21; difference ∼0.67 on a 5-point scale, 95 % CI [0.51, 0.83], p < .001, Cohen's d ≈ 0.76). Together, these findings support the NIQ's capacity to distinguish between healthy self-perceptual depth and maladaptive rumination following literary reading. The discussion highlights theoretical implications for narrative identity development, the dual role of expressive reading in fostering insight versus rumination, and the potential of the NIQ for future research and practical applications. Key strengths, such as the multi-study design and integration of literary theory with psychological measurement, are discussed alongside limitations including sample characteristics and the need for broader validation.
期刊介绍:
New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.