Redifferentiation therapy in unresectable or metastatic radioactive iodine refractory thyroid cancer: an International Thyroid Oncology Group statement
Sophie Leboulleux, Laura Boucai, Naifa Busaidy, Cosimo Durante, James A Fagin, Sasan Fazeli, Andrew G Gianoukakis, Bryan R Haugen, Hyunseok Kang, Bhavana Konda, Theodore W Laetsch, Laura Locati, Mabel Ryder, Christine Spitzweg, Francis P Worden, Lori Wirth, Alan Ho
{"title":"Redifferentiation therapy in unresectable or metastatic radioactive iodine refractory thyroid cancer: an International Thyroid Oncology Group statement","authors":"Sophie Leboulleux, Laura Boucai, Naifa Busaidy, Cosimo Durante, James A Fagin, Sasan Fazeli, Andrew G Gianoukakis, Bryan R Haugen, Hyunseok Kang, Bhavana Konda, Theodore W Laetsch, Laura Locati, Mabel Ryder, Christine Spitzweg, Francis P Worden, Lori Wirth, Alan Ho","doi":"10.1016/s2213-8587(25)00064-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In patients with follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer that have distant metastases and no iodine uptake, redifferentiation—ie, the restoration of tumoural <sup>131</sup>I uptake with systemic therapy—is now possible. The use of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors for a short period of time before the administration of high activity <sup>131</sup>I shows promising results with iodine uptake restoration and tumour response. Redifferentiation has been used in patients with <em>BRAF</em>-mutated and <em>RAS</em>-mutated tumours in prospective trials and in the case of patients with <em>RET</em> or <em>NTRK</em> fusions. The iodine uptake restoration ranges from 33% to 95%, and tumour response rates from 11% to 80%. There is substantial variability between trials with regards to inclusion criteria, duration of redifferentiation drug therapy, activity of radioactive iodine, and use of dosimetry. Randomised studies are missing to clearly establish the effectiveness and applicability of redifferentiation. Thus, long-term studies are needed to establish the most effective redifferentiation protocols. The objectives of this Review are to: (1) provide a comprehensive review of the available results from prospective trials and case reports, including results regarding the restoration of radioiodine uptake and treatment efficacy (morphological and biological); (2) describe the differences in redifferentiation trial design between studies and discuss their potential impact on treatment efficacy; (3) describe the implications and limitations of dosimetry; and (4) outline the key questions to be addressed in future redifferentiation trials.","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":44.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(25)00064-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In patients with follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer that have distant metastases and no iodine uptake, redifferentiation—ie, the restoration of tumoural 131I uptake with systemic therapy—is now possible. The use of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors for a short period of time before the administration of high activity 131I shows promising results with iodine uptake restoration and tumour response. Redifferentiation has been used in patients with BRAF-mutated and RAS-mutated tumours in prospective trials and in the case of patients with RET or NTRK fusions. The iodine uptake restoration ranges from 33% to 95%, and tumour response rates from 11% to 80%. There is substantial variability between trials with regards to inclusion criteria, duration of redifferentiation drug therapy, activity of radioactive iodine, and use of dosimetry. Randomised studies are missing to clearly establish the effectiveness and applicability of redifferentiation. Thus, long-term studies are needed to establish the most effective redifferentiation protocols. The objectives of this Review are to: (1) provide a comprehensive review of the available results from prospective trials and case reports, including results regarding the restoration of radioiodine uptake and treatment efficacy (morphological and biological); (2) describe the differences in redifferentiation trial design between studies and discuss their potential impact on treatment efficacy; (3) describe the implications and limitations of dosimetry; and (4) outline the key questions to be addressed in future redifferentiation trials.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, an independent journal with a global perspective and strong clinical focus, features original clinical research, expert reviews, news, and opinion pieces in each monthly issue. Covering topics like diabetes, obesity, nutrition, and more, the journal provides insights into clinical advances and practice-changing research worldwide. It welcomes original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice, as well as informative reviews on related topics, especially those with global health importance and relevance to low-income and middle-income countries. The journal publishes various content types, including Articles, Reviews, Comments, Correspondence, Health Policy, and Personal Views, along with Series and Commissions aiming to drive positive change in clinical practice and health policy in diabetes and endocrinology.