Predictive Effects of Phraseological Complexity on the Quality of Chinese EFL Learners’ L2 Oral Production

IF 1.7 3区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tingting Wang, Dandan Zhou
{"title":"Predictive Effects of Phraseological Complexity on the Quality of Chinese EFL Learners’ L2 Oral Production","authors":"Tingting Wang,&nbsp;Dandan Zhou","doi":"10.1111/ijal.12662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Phraseological complexity measures have demonstrated significant predictive power for L2 proficiency, predominantly in written contexts. However, empirical evidence regarding their role in L2 oral production remains limited. This study investigates the predictive validity of phraseological complexity measures on L2 oral performance and examines their capacity to differentiate learners across proficiency levels. Analyzing oral performances of 90 test takers in the TEM8-Oral (test for English majors band eight oral test), results revealed that phraseological complexity exhibited stronger explanatory power for oral performance compared to lexical and syntactic complexity, with <i>advmod_RTTR</i> (‘adverb + adjective/adverb/verb’ Root Type-Token Ratio) emerging as the most potent predictor. Significant differences were observed in <i>amod_RTTR </i>(‘adjective + noun’ Root Type-Token Ratio), <i>dobj_RTTR </i>(‘verb + direct object’ Root Type-Token Ratio), and <i>advmod_RTTR</i> across proficiency levels. Notably, <i>dobj_RTTR</i> and <i>advmod_RTTR</i> uniquely distinguished between all adjacent levels, while other features differentiated only specific levels or showed no clear trends. This study expands on the research on the relationship between phraseological complexity and L2 speaking ability in a Chinese context and provides implications for oral English teaching and refinement of rating for English speaking assessment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46851,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"35 2","pages":"810-823"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phraseological complexity measures have demonstrated significant predictive power for L2 proficiency, predominantly in written contexts. However, empirical evidence regarding their role in L2 oral production remains limited. This study investigates the predictive validity of phraseological complexity measures on L2 oral performance and examines their capacity to differentiate learners across proficiency levels. Analyzing oral performances of 90 test takers in the TEM8-Oral (test for English majors band eight oral test), results revealed that phraseological complexity exhibited stronger explanatory power for oral performance compared to lexical and syntactic complexity, with advmod_RTTR (‘adverb + adjective/adverb/verb’ Root Type-Token Ratio) emerging as the most potent predictor. Significant differences were observed in amod_RTTR (‘adjective + noun’ Root Type-Token Ratio), dobj_RTTR (‘verb + direct object’ Root Type-Token Ratio), and advmod_RTTR across proficiency levels. Notably, dobj_RTTR and advmod_RTTR uniquely distinguished between all adjacent levels, while other features differentiated only specific levels or showed no clear trends. This study expands on the research on the relationship between phraseological complexity and L2 speaking ability in a Chinese context and provides implications for oral English teaching and refinement of rating for English speaking assessment.

词汇复杂性对中国英语学习者第二语言口语表达质量的预测作用
短语复杂性测量已经证明了对第二语言熟练程度的显著预测能力,主要是在书面语境中。然而,关于他们在第二语言口语生产中的作用的经验证据仍然有限。本研究探讨了短语复杂性测量对二语口语表现的预测有效性,并检验了它们区分不同熟练程度学习者的能力。通过对90名考生的英语专业八级口语考试(TEM8-Oral)的分析,结果表明,与词汇和句法复杂性相比,短语复杂性对口语表现的解释能力更强,其中advmod_RTTR(副词+形容词/副词/动词词根类型-表征比)是最有效的预测因子。amod_RTTR(“形容词+名词”根类型-令牌比)、dobj_RTTR(“动词+直接宾语”根类型-令牌比)和advmod_RTTR在不同水平上存在显著差异。值得注意的是,dobj_RTTR和advmod_RTTR可以唯一区分相邻的所有级别,而其他特征仅区分特定级别或没有明显的趋势。本研究对汉语语境下词汇复杂性与第二语言口语能力关系的研究进行了拓展,并对英语口语教学和英语口语评价等级的完善提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Linguistics (InJAL) publishes articles that explore the relationship between expertise in linguistics, broadly defined, and the everyday experience of language. Its scope is international in that it welcomes articles which show explicitly how local issues of language use or learning exemplify more global concerns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信