{"title":"Predictive Effects of Phraseological Complexity on the Quality of Chinese EFL Learners’ L2 Oral Production","authors":"Tingting Wang, Dandan Zhou","doi":"10.1111/ijal.12662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Phraseological complexity measures have demonstrated significant predictive power for L2 proficiency, predominantly in written contexts. However, empirical evidence regarding their role in L2 oral production remains limited. This study investigates the predictive validity of phraseological complexity measures on L2 oral performance and examines their capacity to differentiate learners across proficiency levels. Analyzing oral performances of 90 test takers in the TEM8-Oral (test for English majors band eight oral test), results revealed that phraseological complexity exhibited stronger explanatory power for oral performance compared to lexical and syntactic complexity, with <i>advmod_RTTR</i> (‘adverb + adjective/adverb/verb’ Root Type-Token Ratio) emerging as the most potent predictor. Significant differences were observed in <i>amod_RTTR </i>(‘adjective + noun’ Root Type-Token Ratio), <i>dobj_RTTR </i>(‘verb + direct object’ Root Type-Token Ratio), and <i>advmod_RTTR</i> across proficiency levels. Notably, <i>dobj_RTTR</i> and <i>advmod_RTTR</i> uniquely distinguished between all adjacent levels, while other features differentiated only specific levels or showed no clear trends. This study expands on the research on the relationship between phraseological complexity and L2 speaking ability in a Chinese context and provides implications for oral English teaching and refinement of rating for English speaking assessment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46851,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"35 2","pages":"810-823"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Phraseological complexity measures have demonstrated significant predictive power for L2 proficiency, predominantly in written contexts. However, empirical evidence regarding their role in L2 oral production remains limited. This study investigates the predictive validity of phraseological complexity measures on L2 oral performance and examines their capacity to differentiate learners across proficiency levels. Analyzing oral performances of 90 test takers in the TEM8-Oral (test for English majors band eight oral test), results revealed that phraseological complexity exhibited stronger explanatory power for oral performance compared to lexical and syntactic complexity, with advmod_RTTR (‘adverb + adjective/adverb/verb’ Root Type-Token Ratio) emerging as the most potent predictor. Significant differences were observed in amod_RTTR (‘adjective + noun’ Root Type-Token Ratio), dobj_RTTR (‘verb + direct object’ Root Type-Token Ratio), and advmod_RTTR across proficiency levels. Notably, dobj_RTTR and advmod_RTTR uniquely distinguished between all adjacent levels, while other features differentiated only specific levels or showed no clear trends. This study expands on the research on the relationship between phraseological complexity and L2 speaking ability in a Chinese context and provides implications for oral English teaching and refinement of rating for English speaking assessment.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Applied Linguistics (InJAL) publishes articles that explore the relationship between expertise in linguistics, broadly defined, and the everyday experience of language. Its scope is international in that it welcomes articles which show explicitly how local issues of language use or learning exemplify more global concerns.