Comparison of Methods for Obtaining Graphene Structures

IF 0.6 4区 材料科学 Q4 CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
S. B. Nechushkin, A. I. Ril’, A. V. Timofeev, M. V. Chichkov, M. A. Sitnov, V. V. Kozlov
{"title":"Comparison of Methods for Obtaining Graphene Structures","authors":"S. B. Nechushkin,&nbsp;A. I. Ril’,&nbsp;A. V. Timofeev,&nbsp;M. V. Chichkov,&nbsp;M. A. Sitnov,&nbsp;V. V. Kozlov","doi":"10.1134/S1063774525600152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Three methods for obtaining graphene structures have been investigated: ultrasonic liquid-phase exfoliation (20–60 min), mechanical treatment in a vibratory cup mill, and Hammer’s method. An ultrasonic processing in a polyacrylonitrile/dimethylformamide solution led to a decrease in the particle size from 25.3 to 9.57 µm; the fraction of (5–20)-µm particles reached 68%, and the fraction of particles smaller than 1 µm was 2.69%. According to the atomic force microscopy data, the layer height reduced from 1.1 µm to 100 nm, and the fraction of large aggregates (&gt;100 µm) decreased from 40 to 10%. Mechanical exfoliation with polyacrylonitrile increased the interlayer spacing to 3.609 Å in comparison with 3.373–3.376 Å, a value obtained by ultrasonic treatment. Hammer’s method demonstrated the best exfoliation (according to the X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy data): <i>I</i><sub><i>D</i></sub>/<i>I</i><sub><i>G</i></sub> = 1, <i>I</i><sub>2<i>D</i></sub>/<i>I</i><sub><i>G</i></sub> = 0.07, <span>\\({{I}_{{\\left( {D + D'} \\right)}}}\\)</span>/<i>I</i><sub><i>G</i></sub> = 0.12. Molecular modeling revealed a decrease in the specific energy of the system from 351.68 to 200.21 J/g with an increase in the C : O ratio from 38 : 1 to 111 : 1, reaching a minimum of 10.780 J/g for pure graphene.</p>","PeriodicalId":527,"journal":{"name":"Crystallography Reports","volume":"69 1 supplement","pages":"S31 - S37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crystallography Reports","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1063774525600152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRYSTALLOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three methods for obtaining graphene structures have been investigated: ultrasonic liquid-phase exfoliation (20–60 min), mechanical treatment in a vibratory cup mill, and Hammer’s method. An ultrasonic processing in a polyacrylonitrile/dimethylformamide solution led to a decrease in the particle size from 25.3 to 9.57 µm; the fraction of (5–20)-µm particles reached 68%, and the fraction of particles smaller than 1 µm was 2.69%. According to the atomic force microscopy data, the layer height reduced from 1.1 µm to 100 nm, and the fraction of large aggregates (>100 µm) decreased from 40 to 10%. Mechanical exfoliation with polyacrylonitrile increased the interlayer spacing to 3.609 Å in comparison with 3.373–3.376 Å, a value obtained by ultrasonic treatment. Hammer’s method demonstrated the best exfoliation (according to the X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy data): ID/IG = 1, I2D/IG = 0.07, \({{I}_{{\left( {D + D'} \right)}}}\)/IG = 0.12. Molecular modeling revealed a decrease in the specific energy of the system from 351.68 to 200.21 J/g with an increase in the C : O ratio from 38 : 1 to 111 : 1, reaching a minimum of 10.780 J/g for pure graphene.

Abstract Image

制备石墨烯结构的方法比较
研究了三种获得石墨烯结构的方法:超声波液相剥离(20-60分钟)、振动杯磨机的机械处理和Hammer的方法。在聚丙烯腈/二甲基甲酰胺溶液中进行超声波处理,使粒径从25.3µm减小到9.57µm;(5-20)-µm颗粒的比例达到68%%, and the fraction of particles smaller than 1 µm was 2.69%. According to the atomic force microscopy data, the layer height reduced from 1.1 µm to 100 nm, and the fraction of large aggregates (>100 µm) decreased from 40 to 10%. Mechanical exfoliation with polyacrylonitrile increased the interlayer spacing to 3.609 Å in comparison with 3.373–3.376 Å, a value obtained by ultrasonic treatment. Hammer’s method demonstrated the best exfoliation (according to the X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy data): ID/IG = 1, I2D/IG = 0.07, \({{I}_{{\left( {D + D'} \right)}}}\)/IG = 0.12. Molecular modeling revealed a decrease in the specific energy of the system from 351.68 to 200.21 J/g with an increase in the C : O ratio from 38 : 1 to 111 : 1, reaching a minimum of 10.780 J/g for pure graphene.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crystallography Reports
Crystallography Reports 化学-晶体学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
96
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Crystallography Reports is a journal that publishes original articles short communications, and reviews on various aspects of crystallography: diffraction and scattering of X-rays, electrons, and neutrons, determination of crystal structure of inorganic and organic substances, including proteins and other biological substances; UV-VIS and IR spectroscopy; growth, imperfect structure and physical properties of crystals; thin films, liquid crystals, nanomaterials, partially disordered systems, and the methods of studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信