AI and omics technologies in biobanking: Applications and challenges for public health

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Pedro Venturini , Paula Lobato Faria , João V. Cordeiro
{"title":"AI and omics technologies in biobanking: Applications and challenges for public health","authors":"Pedro Venturini ,&nbsp;Paula Lobato Faria ,&nbsp;João V. Cordeiro","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Considering the growing intersection of biobanks, artificial intelligence (AI) and omics research, and their critical impact on public health, this study aimed to explore the current and future public health implications and challenges of AI and omics-driven innovations in biobanking.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Narrative literature review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A structured literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and IEEExplore databases using relevant search terms. Additional references were identified through backward and forward citation chaining. Key themes were aggregated and analysed through thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-seven studies were selected for analysis, leading to the identification and categorisation of key developments. Several key technical, ethical and implementation challenges were also identified, including AI model selection, data accessibility, variability and quality issues, lack of robust and standardised validation methods, explainability, accountability, lack of transparency, algorithmic bias, privacy, security and fairness issues, and governance model selection. Based on these results, potential future scenarios of AI and omics integration in biobanking and their related public health implications were considered.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While AI and omics-driven innovations in biobanking offer specific transformative public health benefits, addressing their technical, ethical and implementation challenges is crucial. Robust regulatory frameworks, feasible governance models, access to quality data, interdisciplinary collaboration, and transparent and validated AI systems are essential to maximise benefits and mitigate risks. Further research and policy development are needed to support the responsible integration of these technologies in biobanking and public health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"243 ","pages":"Article 105726"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003335062500157X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Considering the growing intersection of biobanks, artificial intelligence (AI) and omics research, and their critical impact on public health, this study aimed to explore the current and future public health implications and challenges of AI and omics-driven innovations in biobanking.

Study design

Narrative literature review.

Methods

A structured literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and IEEExplore databases using relevant search terms. Additional references were identified through backward and forward citation chaining. Key themes were aggregated and analysed through thematic analysis.

Results

Thirty-seven studies were selected for analysis, leading to the identification and categorisation of key developments. Several key technical, ethical and implementation challenges were also identified, including AI model selection, data accessibility, variability and quality issues, lack of robust and standardised validation methods, explainability, accountability, lack of transparency, algorithmic bias, privacy, security and fairness issues, and governance model selection. Based on these results, potential future scenarios of AI and omics integration in biobanking and their related public health implications were considered.

Conclusions

While AI and omics-driven innovations in biobanking offer specific transformative public health benefits, addressing their technical, ethical and implementation challenges is crucial. Robust regulatory frameworks, feasible governance models, access to quality data, interdisciplinary collaboration, and transparent and validated AI systems are essential to maximise benefits and mitigate risks. Further research and policy development are needed to support the responsible integration of these technologies in biobanking and public health.
生物银行中的人工智能和组学技术:公共卫生的应用和挑战
考虑到生物银行、人工智能(AI)和组学研究日益交叉,以及它们对公共卫生的关键影响,本研究旨在探讨人工智能和组学驱动的生物银行创新对当前和未来公共卫生的影响和挑战。研究设计:叙述性文献综述。方法采用相关检索词在Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science和IEEExplore数据库中进行结构化文献检索。通过反向和正向引文链确定其他参考文献。通过主题分析对关键主题进行汇总和分析。结果37项研究被选中进行分析,导致关键发展的识别和分类。还确定了几个关键的技术、道德和实施挑战,包括人工智能模型选择、数据可访问性、可变性和质量问题、缺乏稳健和标准化的验证方法、可解释性、问责制、缺乏透明度、算法偏见、隐私、安全和公平问题,以及治理模型选择。基于这些结果,考虑了人工智能和组学在生物银行中整合的潜在未来情景及其相关的公共卫生影响。虽然人工智能和基因组学驱动的生物银行创新提供了具体的变革性公共卫生效益,但解决其技术、伦理和实施挑战至关重要。健全的监管框架、可行的治理模式、获得高质量数据、跨学科合作以及透明和经过验证的人工智能系统对于实现利益最大化和降低风险至关重要。需要进一步研究和制定政策,以支持负责任地将这些技术纳入生物银行和公共卫生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信