Using codesign to engage primary care practices in a participatory change process

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sarah J. Fadem , Benjamin F. Crabtree , Lawrence C. Kleinman
{"title":"Using codesign to engage primary care practices in a participatory change process","authors":"Sarah J. Fadem ,&nbsp;Benjamin F. Crabtree ,&nbsp;Lawrence C. Kleinman","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Healthcare has experienced significant transformation in recent years with many changes being imposed on practices from outside sources. When tailoring outside interventions to specific settings, it is important to engage practice members in participatory processes. Yet, tailoring remains a difficult and poorly understood element of implementation. Codesign is one method to achieve context-sensitive, bottom-up change by engaging stakeholders in the design process. With a complex adaptive system (CAS) perspective, codesign reframes interventions as tools to empower practices to drive change based on local challenges and experiences rather than change being imposed upon them. Observing adaptations and facilitating innovations of practice members offers insight into dynamics of the CAS, implementation context, and its limitations. Here, the codesign process is illustrated through a pediatric primary care practice adopting integrated health.</div><div>Contextual inquiry was performed using ethnographic observations to identify barriers and facilitators to integrated health. Observation findings informed codesign workshops with clinicians. Workshop transcripts and drawings were analyzed using an immersion/crystallization approach guided by the Practice Change Model (PCM), an established framework based on complexity science concepts. In these workshops, clinicians described tension between their motivations to care for complex patients and limitations imposed by the health system. Participants’ knowledge of their real-world context allowed them to identify resources and opportunities for changes they could make within their current environment. The reconciliation of the ideal and the real is a core benefit of codesign methods. This innovative approach can be applied more generally to support the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions that reflect real world interactions and complexities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100761"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076425000053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare has experienced significant transformation in recent years with many changes being imposed on practices from outside sources. When tailoring outside interventions to specific settings, it is important to engage practice members in participatory processes. Yet, tailoring remains a difficult and poorly understood element of implementation. Codesign is one method to achieve context-sensitive, bottom-up change by engaging stakeholders in the design process. With a complex adaptive system (CAS) perspective, codesign reframes interventions as tools to empower practices to drive change based on local challenges and experiences rather than change being imposed upon them. Observing adaptations and facilitating innovations of practice members offers insight into dynamics of the CAS, implementation context, and its limitations. Here, the codesign process is illustrated through a pediatric primary care practice adopting integrated health.
Contextual inquiry was performed using ethnographic observations to identify barriers and facilitators to integrated health. Observation findings informed codesign workshops with clinicians. Workshop transcripts and drawings were analyzed using an immersion/crystallization approach guided by the Practice Change Model (PCM), an established framework based on complexity science concepts. In these workshops, clinicians described tension between their motivations to care for complex patients and limitations imposed by the health system. Participants’ knowledge of their real-world context allowed them to identify resources and opportunities for changes they could make within their current environment. The reconciliation of the ideal and the real is a core benefit of codesign methods. This innovative approach can be applied more generally to support the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions that reflect real world interactions and complexities.
使用协同设计使初级保健实践参与到参与式变革过程中
近年来,医疗保健经历了重大变革,外部资源对实践施加了许多变化。在针对特定环境调整外部干预措施时,重要的是让实践成员参与到参与过程中。然而,裁剪仍然是实现的一个困难且难以理解的元素。协同设计是一种通过让涉众参与设计过程来实现上下文敏感的、自下而上的变更的方法。从复杂的自适应系统(CAS)的角度来看,协同设计将干预重新定义为工具,使实践能够基于当地的挑战和经验来驱动变化,而不是将变化强加于他们。观察适应和促进实践成员的创新提供了对CAS动态、实施环境及其局限性的洞察。在这里,通过采用综合健康的儿科初级保健实践来说明协同设计过程。使用人种学观察进行上下文调查,以确定综合健康的障碍和促进因素。观察结果为临床医生共同设计研讨会提供了信息。工作坊记录和图纸使用实践变化模型(PCM)指导的浸入/结晶方法进行分析,PCM是基于复杂性科学概念建立的框架。在这些研讨会上,临床医生描述了他们照顾复杂患者的动机与卫生系统施加的限制之间的紧张关系。参与者对现实环境的了解使他们能够确定在当前环境中可以做出改变的资源和机会。理想与现实的协调是协同设计方法的核心优势。这种创新方法可以更广泛地应用于支持反映现实世界相互作用和复杂性的干预措施的制定、实施和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信