Vasileios Zeimpekis , Anastasios Gialos , Angeliki Eirini Dimou , Christina M. Charalampidou , Georgios Asimakopoulos , Ioannis Karatasios , Dimitrios Gournis , Michael A. Karakassides , Zoi S. Metaxa , Stavros K. Kourkoulis , Nikolaos D. Alexopoulos
{"title":"Sustainable lime-based nano-reinforced pastes for structural health monitoring of the restoration areas of Monuments of Cultural Heritage","authors":"Vasileios Zeimpekis , Anastasios Gialos , Angeliki Eirini Dimou , Christina M. Charalampidou , Georgios Asimakopoulos , Ioannis Karatasios , Dimitrios Gournis , Michael A. Karakassides , Zoi S. Metaxa , Stavros K. Kourkoulis , Nikolaos D. Alexopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of the present article is to investigate the sustainability of the production of different carbon-nanostructures that can be used to reinforce lime-based mortars for structural health monitoring of the restoration areas in Monuments of Cultural Heritage. Aspects like manufacturing cost, environmental impact, mechanical properties, and piezo-resistive response were investigated to select a sustainable carbon nanostructure to reinforce lime-based mortars under different, multi-decision criteria. A quantitative cost assessment methodology for five (5) different carbon nanostructures (graphene - G and multi-wall carbon nanotubes - MWCNTs) in laboratory-scale was adopted. The results were interpreted against the respective enhancement on the mechanical properties resulted on the end-products, e.g., the nano-reinforced lime-based pastes. The mechanical tests results showed that the modified MWCNTs enhanced flexural strength by 109 % due to increased anchoring of the reinforcing nanostructures in the paste, while compressive strength was not essentially affected. On the contrary, the modified graphene nanostructures enhanced only the compressive strength of the paste by 29 % due to their platelet geometry and their respective load transfer capability. The high manufacturing cost of reduced graphene (rGO) 2.62 €/g is related to the high cost of raw materials utilized, while graphene oxide (GO) has a manufacturing cost of 1.37 €/g, mainly due to the balanced contribution of material and labour cost, respectively. These nanostructures were calculated to have the lowest environmental impact (0.10 kg CO<sub>2eq</sub>/g), while the carboxylation process increased essentially the equivalent carbon footprint by approximately (8 x) eight times (0.83 kg CO<sub>2eq</sub>/g). In most cases, GO excel among the different carbon nanostructures studied, due to its low values in several criteria, like mechanical properties per manufacturing cost or mechanical properties per carbon footprint, as well as showed the best piezo-resistive response to cyclic compressive mechanical loads. To this end, it proved to be the most sustainable carbon nanostructure to be exploited in relevant applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"480 ","pages":"Article 141456"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825016046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of the present article is to investigate the sustainability of the production of different carbon-nanostructures that can be used to reinforce lime-based mortars for structural health monitoring of the restoration areas in Monuments of Cultural Heritage. Aspects like manufacturing cost, environmental impact, mechanical properties, and piezo-resistive response were investigated to select a sustainable carbon nanostructure to reinforce lime-based mortars under different, multi-decision criteria. A quantitative cost assessment methodology for five (5) different carbon nanostructures (graphene - G and multi-wall carbon nanotubes - MWCNTs) in laboratory-scale was adopted. The results were interpreted against the respective enhancement on the mechanical properties resulted on the end-products, e.g., the nano-reinforced lime-based pastes. The mechanical tests results showed that the modified MWCNTs enhanced flexural strength by 109 % due to increased anchoring of the reinforcing nanostructures in the paste, while compressive strength was not essentially affected. On the contrary, the modified graphene nanostructures enhanced only the compressive strength of the paste by 29 % due to their platelet geometry and their respective load transfer capability. The high manufacturing cost of reduced graphene (rGO) 2.62 €/g is related to the high cost of raw materials utilized, while graphene oxide (GO) has a manufacturing cost of 1.37 €/g, mainly due to the balanced contribution of material and labour cost, respectively. These nanostructures were calculated to have the lowest environmental impact (0.10 kg CO2eq/g), while the carboxylation process increased essentially the equivalent carbon footprint by approximately (8 x) eight times (0.83 kg CO2eq/g). In most cases, GO excel among the different carbon nanostructures studied, due to its low values in several criteria, like mechanical properties per manufacturing cost or mechanical properties per carbon footprint, as well as showed the best piezo-resistive response to cyclic compressive mechanical loads. To this end, it proved to be the most sustainable carbon nanostructure to be exploited in relevant applications.
期刊介绍:
Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged.
Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.