Is streamer live-stream favorable to merchant live-stream? The effect of pre- and post-effort

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Tong Wang
{"title":"Is streamer live-stream favorable to merchant live-stream? The effect of pre- and post-effort","authors":"Tong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the digital commerce era, live-stream has become an essential sales channel, prompting manufacturers to strategically select among merchant employees, low-influence streamers (L-streamers) and high-influence streamers (H-streamers). Few studies comparatively analyze how sales effort and dynamic commission rate influence manufacturers' profitability and channel selection. This study bridges this gap by developing a dual-channel model to evaluate these two incentive mechanisms. Results indicate that at equal commission rates, L-streamers consistently yield higher profits than merchant employees, whereas H-streamers only outperform employees at higher commission rates for products easily sold via live-stream. Additionally, L-streamers generate higher profits than H-streamers under identical commission rates. In post-effort scenarios, increasing commission rate motivates sales effort from streamers and employees, significantly affecting manufacturers' channel preferences. Specifically, manufacturers prefer merchant employees at lower commission rates and shift towards L-streamers at higher rates. The choice between merchant employees and H-streamers depends on product characteristics, hassle cost and disutility factor: H-streamers are favored at higher commission rates for easily sellable products, while merchant employees are preferred when the traditional online channel retains clear advantages. Furthermore, manufacturers’ preferences between pre- and post-effort scenarios vary by hassle cost and commission rate. Our analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of dynamic commission structure relative to sales effort incentive, guiding manufacturers in optimizing channel strategies and commission structures to achieve sustained profitability and channel stability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104314"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925000931","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the digital commerce era, live-stream has become an essential sales channel, prompting manufacturers to strategically select among merchant employees, low-influence streamers (L-streamers) and high-influence streamers (H-streamers). Few studies comparatively analyze how sales effort and dynamic commission rate influence manufacturers' profitability and channel selection. This study bridges this gap by developing a dual-channel model to evaluate these two incentive mechanisms. Results indicate that at equal commission rates, L-streamers consistently yield higher profits than merchant employees, whereas H-streamers only outperform employees at higher commission rates for products easily sold via live-stream. Additionally, L-streamers generate higher profits than H-streamers under identical commission rates. In post-effort scenarios, increasing commission rate motivates sales effort from streamers and employees, significantly affecting manufacturers' channel preferences. Specifically, manufacturers prefer merchant employees at lower commission rates and shift towards L-streamers at higher rates. The choice between merchant employees and H-streamers depends on product characteristics, hassle cost and disutility factor: H-streamers are favored at higher commission rates for easily sellable products, while merchant employees are preferred when the traditional online channel retains clear advantages. Furthermore, manufacturers’ preferences between pre- and post-effort scenarios vary by hassle cost and commission rate. Our analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of dynamic commission structure relative to sales effort incentive, guiding manufacturers in optimizing channel strategies and commission structures to achieve sustained profitability and channel stability.
主播直播对商家直播有利吗?前后努力的效果
在数字商务时代,直播已经成为必不可少的销售渠道,这促使制造商在商家员工、低影响力主播(L-streamers)和高影响力主播(H-streamers)之间进行战略性选择。很少有研究比较分析销售努力和动态佣金率对制造商盈利能力和渠道选择的影响。本研究通过建立一个双通道模型来评估这两种激励机制,从而弥补了这一差距。结果表明,在相同的佣金率下,l流主播始终比商家员工产生更高的利润,而h流主播仅在通过直播轻松销售的产品中获得更高的佣金率。此外,在相同的佣金率下,l -streamer比h -streamer产生更高的利润。在努力后情景下,提高佣金率会激励主播和员工的销售努力,显著影响制造商的渠道偏好。具体来说,制造商更喜欢佣金率较低的商人雇员,而转向佣金率较高的l -streamer。商家员工和h -streamer之间的选择取决于产品特性、麻烦成本和负效用因素:h -streamer在容易销售的产品中获得更高的佣金率,而当传统在线渠道保留明显优势时,商家员工更受青睐。此外,制造商对前期和后期方案的偏好因麻烦成本和佣金率而异。我们的分析证明了动态佣金结构相对于销售努力激励的有效性,指导制造商优化渠道策略和佣金结构,以实现持续盈利和渠道稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信