Fusarium isolates in burn-injured patients: Clinical characteristics and susceptibility patterns

Q3 Medicine
Robyn Stoianovici , Sierra Young , Jeremiah J. Duby , Naomi Hauser , Erin Louie
{"title":"Fusarium isolates in burn-injured patients: Clinical characteristics and susceptibility patterns","authors":"Robyn Stoianovici ,&nbsp;Sierra Young ,&nbsp;Jeremiah J. Duby ,&nbsp;Naomi Hauser ,&nbsp;Erin Louie","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2025.100407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/Objective</h3><div><em>Fusarium</em> species are ubiquitous in the environment and can cause opportunistic infection in burn-injured patients. The purpose of this retrospective cohort observational study is to characterize <em>Fusarium</em> susceptibilities, antifungal and surgical management, and the effect on survival in this patient population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All burn ICU patients with a positive <em>Fusarium</em> culture were retrospectively identified between November 2017 to June 2023 at a regional burn center. Demographic, clinical, and microbiologic susceptibility data was collected from the electronic medication record.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen patients with positive <em>Fusarium</em> wound cultures were included. The median age was 35 (32–41) years and 28 % were female. The average %TBSA was 55 ± 23 % and r-Baux score of 93 ± 22. The most common mechanism of injury was thermal burn (17 patients, 94 %). This cohort experienced prolonged ICU [53 (46–95) days] and hospital [57 (48– 97) days] lengths of stay. The median time from burn injury to positive <em>Fusarium</em> cultures was 18 (14–24) days. Mechanical ventilation was common (94 %) and prolonged [42 (34–55) days]. Sixty percent of isolates resulted with a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥ 16 mcg/ml for voriconazole and 93 % isolates resulted with an MIC &lt; 1 mcg/ml for amphotericin B. All patients underwent surgical debridement for source control. Ten of 18 patients (55 %) with <em>Fusarium-</em>positive infections survived to hospital discharge. Infection complicated by multisystem organ failure and sepsis was the most common attributable cause of death (88 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients infected with <em>Fusarium</em> were severely burned, critically ill, and exposed to prolonged mechanical ventilation and to central venous catheterization. The high mortality rate associated with <em>Fusarium</em> infection and prolonged time to antifungal susceptibility results emphasize the importance of appropriate empiric therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246891222500015X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Objective

Fusarium species are ubiquitous in the environment and can cause opportunistic infection in burn-injured patients. The purpose of this retrospective cohort observational study is to characterize Fusarium susceptibilities, antifungal and surgical management, and the effect on survival in this patient population.

Methods

All burn ICU patients with a positive Fusarium culture were retrospectively identified between November 2017 to June 2023 at a regional burn center. Demographic, clinical, and microbiologic susceptibility data was collected from the electronic medication record.

Results

Eighteen patients with positive Fusarium wound cultures were included. The median age was 35 (32–41) years and 28 % were female. The average %TBSA was 55 ± 23 % and r-Baux score of 93 ± 22. The most common mechanism of injury was thermal burn (17 patients, 94 %). This cohort experienced prolonged ICU [53 (46–95) days] and hospital [57 (48– 97) days] lengths of stay. The median time from burn injury to positive Fusarium cultures was 18 (14–24) days. Mechanical ventilation was common (94 %) and prolonged [42 (34–55) days]. Sixty percent of isolates resulted with a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥ 16 mcg/ml for voriconazole and 93 % isolates resulted with an MIC < 1 mcg/ml for amphotericin B. All patients underwent surgical debridement for source control. Ten of 18 patients (55 %) with Fusarium-positive infections survived to hospital discharge. Infection complicated by multisystem organ failure and sepsis was the most common attributable cause of death (88 %).

Conclusion

Patients infected with Fusarium were severely burned, critically ill, and exposed to prolonged mechanical ventilation and to central venous catheterization. The high mortality rate associated with Fusarium infection and prolonged time to antifungal susceptibility results emphasize the importance of appropriate empiric therapy.
烧伤患者分离的镰刀菌:临床特征和易感模式
摘要目的镰刀菌广泛存在于环境中,可引起烧伤患者的机会性感染。本回顾性队列观察研究的目的是表征镰刀菌的敏感性,抗真菌和手术治疗,以及对患者生存的影响。方法回顾性分析某地区烧伤中心2017年11月至2023年6月收治的所有镰刀菌培养阳性烧伤ICU患者。从电子用药记录中收集人口统计学、临床和微生物敏感性数据。结果18例伤口镰刀菌培养阳性。中位年龄为35岁(32-41岁),28%为女性。平均%TBSA为55±23%,r-Baux评分为93±22。最常见的损伤机制为热烧伤(17例,94%)。该队列经历了延长的ICU[53(46-95)天]和住院[57(48 - 97)天]的住院时间。从烧伤到镰刀菌培养阳性的中位时间为18(14-24)天。机械通气常见(94%)且时间延长[42(34-55)天]。60%的分离株voriconazole最小抑菌浓度(MIC)≥16 mcg/ml, 93%的分离株voriconazole最小抑菌浓度≥16 mcg/ml;两性霉素b 1微克/毫升。所有患者均行手术清创以控制传染源。镰刀菌阳性感染的18例患者中有10例(55%)存活至出院。感染合并多系统器官衰竭和败血症是最常见的可归因死亡原因(88%)。结论镰刀菌感染患者烧伤严重,病情危重,需长期机械通气和中心静脉置管。镰孢菌感染的高死亡率和较长的抗真菌敏感性结果强调了适当的经验性治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信