Pei Wang , Zhicong Zhao , Ruijia Zhu , Hao Wang , Shaochong Xue , Yiwei Liu , Fangyi Wang , Yue Cao , Le Yu , Rui Yang
{"title":"Using open GPS trajectory data to quantify nature-based recreation at a national scale","authors":"Pei Wang , Zhicong Zhao , Ruijia Zhu , Hao Wang , Shaochong Xue , Yiwei Liu , Fangyi Wang , Yue Cao , Le Yu , Rui Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the patterns of nature-based recreation (NbR) is crucial for both the sustainability of NbR and nature conservation. Using open GPS trajectory data, this study quantifies the spatial and temporal patterns of NbR in China’s non-urban areas (NUA). Results reveal that when China’s NUA are divided into 1 km grids, NbR trajectories are distributed across 8.67 % of these grids. Spatial autocorrelation analysis reveals the significant clustering pattern of NbR activities. The 1 km-resolution density map of NbR trajectories indicates that the number of NbR activities per unit area follows a power-law distribution. Using the Getis-Ord Gi* method, we identify the hotspots of NbR activities covering 0.21 % of China’s NUA, of which 31.13 % are within protected areas (PAs). The average density of NbR trajectories of NUA within PAs is 1.75 times that of NUA outside PAs. 59.96 % of terrestrial national nature reserves face higher NbR activity density pressure than their buffer zones. Our findings highlight the NbR pressure challenges faced by China’s PAs, contribute to optimizing China’s management of NbR and PAs. This study proposes a framework for using open GPS trajectories to analyze NbR activities in NUA and PAs at a national scale, which can be adapted in other countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 108340"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002198","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding the patterns of nature-based recreation (NbR) is crucial for both the sustainability of NbR and nature conservation. Using open GPS trajectory data, this study quantifies the spatial and temporal patterns of NbR in China’s non-urban areas (NUA). Results reveal that when China’s NUA are divided into 1 km grids, NbR trajectories are distributed across 8.67 % of these grids. Spatial autocorrelation analysis reveals the significant clustering pattern of NbR activities. The 1 km-resolution density map of NbR trajectories indicates that the number of NbR activities per unit area follows a power-law distribution. Using the Getis-Ord Gi* method, we identify the hotspots of NbR activities covering 0.21 % of China’s NUA, of which 31.13 % are within protected areas (PAs). The average density of NbR trajectories of NUA within PAs is 1.75 times that of NUA outside PAs. 59.96 % of terrestrial national nature reserves face higher NbR activity density pressure than their buffer zones. Our findings highlight the NbR pressure challenges faced by China’s PAs, contribute to optimizing China’s management of NbR and PAs. This study proposes a framework for using open GPS trajectories to analyze NbR activities in NUA and PAs at a national scale, which can be adapted in other countries.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.