Benjamin C. Klementz , Georg Brenneis , Ethan M. Laumer , Sophie M. Neu , Mark S. Harvey , Prashant P. Sharma
{"title":"Evolution and homology of leg segments in Chelicerata: Evo-devo solutions to century-old challenges","authors":"Benjamin C. Klementz , Georg Brenneis , Ethan M. Laumer , Sophie M. Neu , Mark S. Harvey , Prashant P. Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.asd.2025.101446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A major theme in the evolution of Arthropoda is the origin and diversification of jointed appendages. One appealing framework for the evolution of arthropod appendage diversity has long been that a small network of homologous genes in the panarthropod ancestor established and subdivided the proximo-distal (PD) appendage axis, with lineage-specific modifications of these genes’ expression domains resulting in novel types of appendages. A corollary of this idea is the inference that each segment in the arthropod leg can be directly homologized to other such segments, based on anatomical or developmental genetic landmarks. Here, we explore the evolution of leg segments in Chelicerata, a group which exhibits marked diversity in leg architecture and number of leg segments, and thereby poses a greater challenge to the exercise of assigning segmental homologies. Focusing on the controversial nomenclature of leg segments in Pycnogonida (sea spiders), we identify potential markers of positional homology in different parts of the sea spider and arachnid PD axis, using comparative gene expression data. Nevertheless, we identify caveats to the use of transcription factor expression domains as landmarks for inference of positional homology, highlighting cases where datasets conflict in homology assignment. We postulate that the utility of gene expression data for inferring homologies is a function of phylogenetic distance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55461,"journal":{"name":"Arthropod Structure & Development","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 101446"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthropod Structure & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467803925000386","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A major theme in the evolution of Arthropoda is the origin and diversification of jointed appendages. One appealing framework for the evolution of arthropod appendage diversity has long been that a small network of homologous genes in the panarthropod ancestor established and subdivided the proximo-distal (PD) appendage axis, with lineage-specific modifications of these genes’ expression domains resulting in novel types of appendages. A corollary of this idea is the inference that each segment in the arthropod leg can be directly homologized to other such segments, based on anatomical or developmental genetic landmarks. Here, we explore the evolution of leg segments in Chelicerata, a group which exhibits marked diversity in leg architecture and number of leg segments, and thereby poses a greater challenge to the exercise of assigning segmental homologies. Focusing on the controversial nomenclature of leg segments in Pycnogonida (sea spiders), we identify potential markers of positional homology in different parts of the sea spider and arachnid PD axis, using comparative gene expression data. Nevertheless, we identify caveats to the use of transcription factor expression domains as landmarks for inference of positional homology, highlighting cases where datasets conflict in homology assignment. We postulate that the utility of gene expression data for inferring homologies is a function of phylogenetic distance.
期刊介绍:
Arthropod Structure & Development is a Journal of Arthropod Structural Biology, Development, and Functional Morphology; it considers manuscripts that deal with micro- and neuroanatomy, development, biomechanics, organogenesis in particular under comparative and evolutionary aspects but not merely taxonomic papers. The aim of the journal is to publish papers in the areas of functional and comparative anatomy and development, with an emphasis on the role of cellular organization in organ function. The journal will also publish papers on organogenisis, embryonic and postembryonic development, and organ or tissue regeneration and repair. Manuscripts dealing with comparative and evolutionary aspects of microanatomy and development are encouraged.