Development and validation of the Adult Attachment Trauma Questionnaire (AATQ)

IF 2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Andrea Zagaria, Enrico Perinelli, Luigi Lombardi
{"title":"Development and validation of the Adult Attachment Trauma Questionnaire (AATQ)","authors":"Andrea Zagaria,&nbsp;Enrico Perinelli,&nbsp;Luigi Lombardi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2025.100533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the wide use of the concept of Attachment Trauma (AT) in clinics and research, there is a scarcity of proper assessment tools. This work aims to fill this gap by outlining the development and validation of the <em>Adult Attachment Trauma Questionnaire</em> (AATQ). The preliminary item pool covered eight conceptual domains: Conflict, Attachment-related Dissociation, Attachment Phobia, Victim, Compulsive Savior, Dangerous Self, Revengeful Perpetrator, and Sadistic Perpetrator. The items were analyzed through two pilot studies. After revising the items according to the results, the final pool underwent factorial, convergent, and incremental validity analyses in a general sample of 407 Italian adults. The EFA supported the eight-factor structure. Validity analyses demonstrated excellent convergent and predictive validity across all questionnaire subscales, except for two of them (Compulsive Savior, Sadistic Perpetrator) that did not exhibit good performance and were subsequently removed. The AATQ final version consisted of six subscales and 28 total items and was confirmed in a further EFA. The AATQ performed better than a popular fearful/disorganized attachment measure (<em>Adult Disorganized Attachment</em> scale) and a standard measure of adult attachment (<em>Emotions in Close Relationships</em>) in predicting traumatic and pathological outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":"9 2","pages":"Article 100533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749925000353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the wide use of the concept of Attachment Trauma (AT) in clinics and research, there is a scarcity of proper assessment tools. This work aims to fill this gap by outlining the development and validation of the Adult Attachment Trauma Questionnaire (AATQ). The preliminary item pool covered eight conceptual domains: Conflict, Attachment-related Dissociation, Attachment Phobia, Victim, Compulsive Savior, Dangerous Self, Revengeful Perpetrator, and Sadistic Perpetrator. The items were analyzed through two pilot studies. After revising the items according to the results, the final pool underwent factorial, convergent, and incremental validity analyses in a general sample of 407 Italian adults. The EFA supported the eight-factor structure. Validity analyses demonstrated excellent convergent and predictive validity across all questionnaire subscales, except for two of them (Compulsive Savior, Sadistic Perpetrator) that did not exhibit good performance and were subsequently removed. The AATQ final version consisted of six subscales and 28 total items and was confirmed in a further EFA. The AATQ performed better than a popular fearful/disorganized attachment measure (Adult Disorganized Attachment scale) and a standard measure of adult attachment (Emotions in Close Relationships) in predicting traumatic and pathological outcomes.
成人依恋创伤问卷(AATQ)的编制与验证
尽管依恋创伤的概念在临床和研究中被广泛使用,但缺乏适当的评估工具。本研究旨在通过概述成人依恋创伤问卷(AATQ)的开发和验证来填补这一空白。初步项目池包括八个概念域:冲突、依恋相关分离、依恋恐惧症、受害者、强迫性救主、危险自我、报复性加害者和施虐性加害者。这些项目通过两个试点研究进行了分析。根据结果修改项目后,最终池在407名意大利成年人的一般样本中进行了析因、收敛和增量效度分析。全民教育联盟支持八要素结构。效度分析显示,除了其中两个(强迫性拯救者、施虐者)表现不佳并随后被删除外,所有问卷子量表的收敛效度和预测效度都很好。AATQ最终版本由6个分量表和28个项目组成,并在进一步的EFA中得到确认。在预测创伤和病理结果方面,AATQ比流行的恐惧/无序依恋量表(成人无序依恋量表)和标准的成人依恋量表(亲密关系中的情绪)表现得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信