Promoting transparency in AI for biomedical and behavioral research

IF 58.7 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Aaron Y. Lee, Julia Stoyanovich, Laura Biven
{"title":"Promoting transparency in AI for biomedical and behavioral research","authors":"Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Aaron Y. Lee, Julia Stoyanovich, Laura Biven","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03680-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare have highlighted the need for transparency, including explainability, interpretability, and accountability across the AI lifecycle<sup>1,2</sup>. Transparency ensures stakeholders can make informed decisions about data and model reuse, fostering trust and fairness while aligning with regulatory frameworks. However, the concept of transparency lacks a clear definition for both biomedical research and clinical care, resulting in inconsistent practices.</p><p>This Correspondence focuses on transparency within the realm of AI-driven biomedical and behavioral research. Although the effect of AI on clinical care is crucial, this discussion centers on its implications for research, addressing gaps in data reuse, model generalization and fairness. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Data Science Strategy (ODSS) convened a workshop that brought together leading experts in AI, healthcare and ethics to examine transparency in this context<sup>3</sup>. The workshop findings highlight practical solutions tailored to research contexts, addressing documentation standards, patient and community co-design, and oversight mechanisms to achieve equitable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03680-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare have highlighted the need for transparency, including explainability, interpretability, and accountability across the AI lifecycle1,2. Transparency ensures stakeholders can make informed decisions about data and model reuse, fostering trust and fairness while aligning with regulatory frameworks. However, the concept of transparency lacks a clear definition for both biomedical research and clinical care, resulting in inconsistent practices.

This Correspondence focuses on transparency within the realm of AI-driven biomedical and behavioral research. Although the effect of AI on clinical care is crucial, this discussion centers on its implications for research, addressing gaps in data reuse, model generalization and fairness. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Data Science Strategy (ODSS) convened a workshop that brought together leading experts in AI, healthcare and ethics to examine transparency in this context3. The workshop findings highlight practical solutions tailored to research contexts, addressing documentation standards, patient and community co-design, and oversight mechanisms to achieve equitable outcomes.

促进生物医学和行为研究中人工智能的透明度
人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域的最新进展突出了对透明度的需求,包括整个人工智能生命周期的可解释性、可解释性和问责制1,2。透明度确保利益相关者能够就数据和模型重用做出明智的决策,在与监管框架保持一致的同时,促进信任和公平。然而,对于生物医学研究和临床护理而言,透明度的概念缺乏明确的定义,导致实践不一致。本文重点关注人工智能驱动的生物医学和行为研究领域的透明度。尽管人工智能对临床护理的影响至关重要,但本讨论的重点是其对研究的影响,解决数据重用、模型泛化和公平性方面的差距。美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)数据科学战略办公室(ODSS)召集了一次研讨会,汇集了人工智能、医疗保健和伦理方面的主要专家,以审查这方面的透明度3。研讨会的成果突出了适合研究背景的实际解决方案,涉及文件标准、患者和社区共同设计以及监督机制,以实现公平的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信