Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Aaron Y. Lee, Julia Stoyanovich, Laura Biven
{"title":"Promoting transparency in AI for biomedical and behavioral research","authors":"Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Aaron Y. Lee, Julia Stoyanovich, Laura Biven","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03680-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare have highlighted the need for transparency, including explainability, interpretability, and accountability across the AI lifecycle<sup>1,2</sup>. Transparency ensures stakeholders can make informed decisions about data and model reuse, fostering trust and fairness while aligning with regulatory frameworks. However, the concept of transparency lacks a clear definition for both biomedical research and clinical care, resulting in inconsistent practices.</p><p>This Correspondence focuses on transparency within the realm of AI-driven biomedical and behavioral research. Although the effect of AI on clinical care is crucial, this discussion centers on its implications for research, addressing gaps in data reuse, model generalization and fairness. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Data Science Strategy (ODSS) convened a workshop that brought together leading experts in AI, healthcare and ethics to examine transparency in this context<sup>3</sup>. The workshop findings highlight practical solutions tailored to research contexts, addressing documentation standards, patient and community co-design, and oversight mechanisms to achieve equitable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03680-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare have highlighted the need for transparency, including explainability, interpretability, and accountability across the AI lifecycle1,2. Transparency ensures stakeholders can make informed decisions about data and model reuse, fostering trust and fairness while aligning with regulatory frameworks. However, the concept of transparency lacks a clear definition for both biomedical research and clinical care, resulting in inconsistent practices.
This Correspondence focuses on transparency within the realm of AI-driven biomedical and behavioral research. Although the effect of AI on clinical care is crucial, this discussion centers on its implications for research, addressing gaps in data reuse, model generalization and fairness. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Data Science Strategy (ODSS) convened a workshop that brought together leading experts in AI, healthcare and ethics to examine transparency in this context3. The workshop findings highlight practical solutions tailored to research contexts, addressing documentation standards, patient and community co-design, and oversight mechanisms to achieve equitable outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.