Developing microbiome research in Africa: the essential role of clinician scientists

IF 45.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mashiko Setshedi, Gianluca Ianiro
{"title":"Developing microbiome research in Africa: the essential role of clinician scientists","authors":"Mashiko Setshedi, Gianluca Ianiro","doi":"10.1038/s41575-025-01069-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We read with interest the Comment by Kouidhi and Oduaran, in which they advocate the standardization of microbiome data collection across Africa (Kouidhi, S. &amp; Oduaran, O. H. Strengthening the foundation of African microbiome research: strategies for standardized data collection. <i>Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol</i>. <b>21</b>, 742–743 (2024))<sup>1</sup>. They highlight the tremendous opportunities of African microbiome research, while also acknowledging the potential obstacles to its implementation, which include the absence of standardized frameworks for metadata collection. To overcome these obstacles, they propose several recommendations, including the development of standardized templates, the launch of training programmes to educate researchers, the implementation of centralized databases that exploit state-of-the-art computational tools and machine learning, regular monitoring and feedback-based improvement of processes, and proactive engagement of local communities.</p><p>The present era is particularly fruitful for microbiome research, as after decades of research we have started to observe the clinical implementation of such efforts. For example, faecal microbiota transplantation is an established treatment option for recurrent <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection and is currently being investigated for chronic non-communicable diseases<sup>2</sup>. In addition, live biotherapeutic products have been approved by the FDA and are currently marketed in the USA<sup>2</sup>. An increasing number of studies are also exploring the diagnostic potential of the microbiome in different clinical areas, such as in colorectal cancer<sup>3</sup>, inflammatory bowel disease<sup>4</sup> and cancer immunotherapy<sup>5</sup>. Moreover, global recommendations to standardize microbiome diagnostics have been released<sup>6</sup>. Taken together, these translational efforts, along with a decrease in sequencing costs and free availability of most computational software<sup>7</sup>, are expected to promote the development of African microbiome research and boost its clinical application. This last step has considerable potential for healthcare improvement in Africa, where the epidemiology of cancer and non-communicable diseases is progressively worsening<sup>8,9</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":18793,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":45.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-025-01069-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We read with interest the Comment by Kouidhi and Oduaran, in which they advocate the standardization of microbiome data collection across Africa (Kouidhi, S. & Oduaran, O. H. Strengthening the foundation of African microbiome research: strategies for standardized data collection. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 21, 742–743 (2024))1. They highlight the tremendous opportunities of African microbiome research, while also acknowledging the potential obstacles to its implementation, which include the absence of standardized frameworks for metadata collection. To overcome these obstacles, they propose several recommendations, including the development of standardized templates, the launch of training programmes to educate researchers, the implementation of centralized databases that exploit state-of-the-art computational tools and machine learning, regular monitoring and feedback-based improvement of processes, and proactive engagement of local communities.

The present era is particularly fruitful for microbiome research, as after decades of research we have started to observe the clinical implementation of such efforts. For example, faecal microbiota transplantation is an established treatment option for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection and is currently being investigated for chronic non-communicable diseases2. In addition, live biotherapeutic products have been approved by the FDA and are currently marketed in the USA2. An increasing number of studies are also exploring the diagnostic potential of the microbiome in different clinical areas, such as in colorectal cancer3, inflammatory bowel disease4 and cancer immunotherapy5. Moreover, global recommendations to standardize microbiome diagnostics have been released6. Taken together, these translational efforts, along with a decrease in sequencing costs and free availability of most computational software7, are expected to promote the development of African microbiome research and boost its clinical application. This last step has considerable potential for healthcare improvement in Africa, where the epidemiology of cancer and non-communicable diseases is progressively worsening8,9.

在非洲发展微生物组研究:临床科学家的重要作用
我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Kouidhi和Oduaran的评论,他们在评论中主张将整个非洲的微生物组数据收集标准化(Kouidhi, S. &;加强非洲微生物组研究基础:标准化数据收集策略。Nat Rev. Gastroenterol。[j] .国际肝病学报,2016,31(2):444 - 444。他们强调了非洲微生物组研究的巨大机遇,同时也承认了其实施的潜在障碍,其中包括缺乏元数据收集的标准化框架。为了克服这些障碍,他们提出了一些建议,包括开发标准化模板,启动培训计划来教育研究人员,实施利用最先进的计算工具和机器学习的集中数据库,定期监测和基于反馈的流程改进,以及当地社区的积极参与。当前的时代对于微生物组的研究是特别富有成效的,因为经过几十年的研究,我们已经开始观察这些努力的临床实施。例如,粪便微生物群移植是复发性艰难梭菌感染的既定治疗选择,目前正在对慢性非传染性疾病进行研究2。此外,活体生物治疗产品已获得FDA批准,目前在美国上市。越来越多的研究也在探索微生物组在不同临床领域的诊断潜力,如结肠直肠癌、炎症性肠病和癌症免疫治疗。此外,已经发布了标准化微生物组诊断的全球建议6。总的来说,这些转化工作,加上测序成本的降低和大多数计算软件的免费使用,有望促进非洲微生物组研究的发展,并促进其临床应用。这最后一步对于改善非洲的医疗保健具有相当大的潜力,在非洲,癌症和非传染性疾病的流行病学正在逐步恶化8,9。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
52.30
自引率
0.60%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology aims to serve as the leading resource for Reviews and commentaries within the scientific and medical communities it caters to. The journal strives to maintain authority, accessibility, and clarity in its published articles, which are complemented by easily understandable figures, tables, and other display items. Dedicated to providing exceptional service to authors, referees, and readers, the editorial team works diligently to maximize the usefulness and impact of each publication. The journal encompasses a wide range of content types, including Research Highlights, News & Views, Comments, Reviews, Perspectives, and Consensus Statements, all pertinent to gastroenterologists and hepatologists. With its broad scope, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology ensures that its articles reach a diverse audience, aiming for the widest possible dissemination of valuable information. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信