Letter: Clarifying the Synergistic Mechanisms of Mediterranean Diet and Time-Restricted Feeding in MASLD Management

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Weixiong Zhu, Wence Zhou
{"title":"Letter: Clarifying the Synergistic Mechanisms of Mediterranean Diet and Time-Restricted Feeding in MASLD Management","authors":"Weixiong Zhu,&nbsp;Wence Zhou","doi":"10.1111/apt.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The CHRONO-NAFLD trial by Tsitsou et al. [<span>1</span>] provides valuable insights into combining Mediterranean diet (MD) and time-restricted feeding (TRF) for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). While the study demonstrates comparable weight loss across groups and superior glycemic benefits with early TRF, three critical questions warrant further discussion to contextualise these findings.</p><p>First, the caloric restriction confounder limits mechanistic interpretation. All groups followed a hypocaloric MD (−500 kcal/day), which itself drives weight loss and metabolic improvements. Prior studies show that TRF's benefits on hepatic steatosis and insulin sensitivity are most pronounced in ad libitum feeding models [<span>2</span>]. By superimposing TRF on caloric restriction, the independent effects of circadian alignment may be obscured. Future trials should isolate TRF's impact by comparing isocaloric TRF vs. non-TRF arms.</p><p>Second, the lack of circadian biomarker data (e.g., melatonin, cortisol rhythms) leaves a key knowledge gap. TRF's efficacy likely depends on synchronising food intake with endogenous circadian clocks regulating hepatic metabolism [<span>3</span>]. The differential glycemic outcomes between eTRF and lTRF groups suggest timing-specific effects on insulin signalling pathways, potentially mediated by clock gene modulation (e.g., BMAL1, PER2). Including circadian phase assessments would clarify whether clinical benefits correlate with restored rhythmicity.</p><p>Lastly, heterogeneity in baseline metabolic dysfunction (e.g., 34% with diabetes, 61% with metabolic syndrome) may have diluted intervention effects. Subgroup analyses stratified by glycemic status or fibrosis severity could identify patients most likely to benefit from TRF-MD synergy. For instance, prediabetic patients showed greater HbA1c reductions in eTRF (−0.3%), aligning with evidence that circadian interventions preferentially improve early dysmetabolism [<span>4</span>].</p><p>While this trial confirms MD's foundational role in MASLD, unravelling the chronobiological mechanisms of TRF and personalising its application remain critical next steps.</p><p><b>Weixiong Zhu:</b> conceptualization, writing – original draft, investigation. <b>Wence Zhou:</b> writing – review and editing, funding acquisition.</p><p>This article is linked to Tsitsou et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70044 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70178.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"61 12","pages":"1981-1982"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.70154","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.70154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The CHRONO-NAFLD trial by Tsitsou et al. [1] provides valuable insights into combining Mediterranean diet (MD) and time-restricted feeding (TRF) for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). While the study demonstrates comparable weight loss across groups and superior glycemic benefits with early TRF, three critical questions warrant further discussion to contextualise these findings.

First, the caloric restriction confounder limits mechanistic interpretation. All groups followed a hypocaloric MD (−500 kcal/day), which itself drives weight loss and metabolic improvements. Prior studies show that TRF's benefits on hepatic steatosis and insulin sensitivity are most pronounced in ad libitum feeding models [2]. By superimposing TRF on caloric restriction, the independent effects of circadian alignment may be obscured. Future trials should isolate TRF's impact by comparing isocaloric TRF vs. non-TRF arms.

Second, the lack of circadian biomarker data (e.g., melatonin, cortisol rhythms) leaves a key knowledge gap. TRF's efficacy likely depends on synchronising food intake with endogenous circadian clocks regulating hepatic metabolism [3]. The differential glycemic outcomes between eTRF and lTRF groups suggest timing-specific effects on insulin signalling pathways, potentially mediated by clock gene modulation (e.g., BMAL1, PER2). Including circadian phase assessments would clarify whether clinical benefits correlate with restored rhythmicity.

Lastly, heterogeneity in baseline metabolic dysfunction (e.g., 34% with diabetes, 61% with metabolic syndrome) may have diluted intervention effects. Subgroup analyses stratified by glycemic status or fibrosis severity could identify patients most likely to benefit from TRF-MD synergy. For instance, prediabetic patients showed greater HbA1c reductions in eTRF (−0.3%), aligning with evidence that circadian interventions preferentially improve early dysmetabolism [4].

While this trial confirms MD's foundational role in MASLD, unravelling the chronobiological mechanisms of TRF and personalising its application remain critical next steps.

Weixiong Zhu: conceptualization, writing – original draft, investigation. Wence Zhou: writing – review and editing, funding acquisition.

This article is linked to Tsitsou et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70044 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70178.

信函:阐明地中海饮食和限时饲养在MASLD管理中的协同作用机制
Tsitsou等人的CHRONO-NAFLD试验为地中海饮食(MD)和限时喂养(TRF)联合治疗代谢功能障碍相关的脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)提供了有价值的见解。虽然该研究表明各组之间的体重减轻程度相当,早期TRF对血糖的益处也更大,但有三个关键问题值得进一步讨论,以便将这些发现联系起来。首先,热量限制混杂因素限制了机制解释。所有组都遵循低热量饮食(- 500千卡/天),这本身就能促进体重减轻和代谢改善。先前的研究表明,TRF对肝脏脂肪变性和胰岛素敏感性的益处在自由采食模型bbb中最为明显。通过将TRF叠加在热量限制上,昼夜节律一致性的独立影响可能会被掩盖。未来的试验应该通过比较等热量的TRF和非TRF来分离TRF的影响。其次,缺乏昼夜生物标志物数据(如褪黑激素、皮质醇节律)留下了一个关键的知识空白。TRF的功效可能取决于食物摄入与调节肝脏代谢的内源性生物钟的同步。eTRF组和ltf组之间的不同血糖结果表明,胰岛素信号通路受到时间特异性影响,可能由时钟基因调节(如BMAL1、PER2)介导。包括昼夜节律阶段评估将澄清临床益处是否与恢复节律性相关。最后,基线代谢功能障碍的异质性(例如,糖尿病为34%,代谢综合征为61%)可能会削弱干预效果。根据血糖状态或纤维化严重程度分层的亚组分析可以确定最有可能从TRF-MD协同作用中获益的患者。例如,糖尿病前期患者在eTRF中表现出更大的HbA1c降低(- 0.3%),这与昼夜节律干预优先改善早期代谢障碍的证据一致。虽然这项试验证实了MD在MASLD中的基础作用,但揭示TRF的时间生物学机制并使其应用个性化仍然是关键的下一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信