A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing dPTFE Membrane to Collagen Membrane in Lateral Bone Augmentation at Single Sites in the Anterior Maxilla: 1-Year Results.
Matthijs Hindryckx,Thomas De Bruyckere,Stefanie De Buyser,Lorenz Seyssens,Retis Shtino,Faris Younes,Jan Cosyn
{"title":"A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing dPTFE Membrane to Collagen Membrane in Lateral Bone Augmentation at Single Sites in the Anterior Maxilla: 1-Year Results.","authors":"Matthijs Hindryckx,Thomas De Bruyckere,Stefanie De Buyser,Lorenz Seyssens,Retis Shtino,Faris Younes,Jan Cosyn","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.14174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nTo compare a dense polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane with a collagen membrane in guided bone regeneration for lateral bone augmentation at single sites in the anterior maxilla in terms of alveolar width, height, complications, need for additional therapy and implant outcomes.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nPatients with a class 4 defect at a single site in the anterior maxilla (15-25) were recruited at five centres. Following flap elevation and conditioning of the recipient site, they were randomly allocated to the dPTFE membrane group or the collagen membrane group. Nine months following bone augmentation, re-entry was performed and implants were placed. Alveolar dimensions were assessed on superimposed cone-beam computed tomography images taken prior to surgery, immediately post operation and at 9 months. Implant outcomes were registered 1 year after bone augmentation.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThirty-six patients were randomised (dPTFE membrane group: 8 females, 10 males, mean age 39; collagen membrane group: 14 females, 4 males, mean age 51) and all complied until the 1-year follow-up. At 9 months, the estimated marginal mean alveolar width was not significantly different between the groups (estimated marginal mean difference at 3 mm below the crest: 0.65 mm; 95% CI: -0.82 to 2.12; p = 0.381). Infection occurred in 6/18 patients treated with a dPTFE membrane and in 0/18 patients treated with a collagen membrane (p = 0.019). Infection occurred in every centre and had a negative impact on the alveolar width at 9 months, despite taking anti-infective measures in every patient and additional bone augmentation in two patients. Implants could be installed in a prosthetically driven position, integrated uneventfully and yielded minimal marginal bone loss.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\ndPTFE membrane and collagen membrane are both effective in lateral bone augmentation. However, dPTFE membrane is more prone to infection than collagen membrane, thereby increasing the need for additional therapy.\r\n\r\nTRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05426616.","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14174","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AIM
To compare a dense polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane with a collagen membrane in guided bone regeneration for lateral bone augmentation at single sites in the anterior maxilla in terms of alveolar width, height, complications, need for additional therapy and implant outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients with a class 4 defect at a single site in the anterior maxilla (15-25) were recruited at five centres. Following flap elevation and conditioning of the recipient site, they were randomly allocated to the dPTFE membrane group or the collagen membrane group. Nine months following bone augmentation, re-entry was performed and implants were placed. Alveolar dimensions were assessed on superimposed cone-beam computed tomography images taken prior to surgery, immediately post operation and at 9 months. Implant outcomes were registered 1 year after bone augmentation.
RESULTS
Thirty-six patients were randomised (dPTFE membrane group: 8 females, 10 males, mean age 39; collagen membrane group: 14 females, 4 males, mean age 51) and all complied until the 1-year follow-up. At 9 months, the estimated marginal mean alveolar width was not significantly different between the groups (estimated marginal mean difference at 3 mm below the crest: 0.65 mm; 95% CI: -0.82 to 2.12; p = 0.381). Infection occurred in 6/18 patients treated with a dPTFE membrane and in 0/18 patients treated with a collagen membrane (p = 0.019). Infection occurred in every centre and had a negative impact on the alveolar width at 9 months, despite taking anti-infective measures in every patient and additional bone augmentation in two patients. Implants could be installed in a prosthetically driven position, integrated uneventfully and yielded minimal marginal bone loss.
CONCLUSION
dPTFE membrane and collagen membrane are both effective in lateral bone augmentation. However, dPTFE membrane is more prone to infection than collagen membrane, thereby increasing the need for additional therapy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05426616.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology.
The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope.
The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.