Predicting Recurrence Following Surgical Resection for High-risk Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Radiomics-Clinical Integration Approach.

Zine-Eddine Khene,Raj Bhanvadia,Isamu Tachibana,Prajwal Sharma,William Graber,Theophile Bertail,Raphael Fleury,Renaud De Crevoisier,Karim Bensalah,Yair Lotan,Vitaly Margulis
{"title":"Predicting Recurrence Following Surgical Resection for High-risk Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Radiomics-Clinical Integration Approach.","authors":"Zine-Eddine Khene,Raj Bhanvadia,Isamu Tachibana,Prajwal Sharma,William Graber,Theophile Bertail,Raphael Fleury,Renaud De Crevoisier,Karim Bensalah,Yair Lotan,Vitaly Margulis","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nAdjuvant immunotherapy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is controversial due to the absence of reliable biomarkers for identifying patients most likely to benefit. This study aimed to develop and validate a quantitative radiomic signature (RS) and a radiomics-clinical model to identify patients at increased risk of recurrence following surgery among those eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis retrospective study included patients with ccRCC who are at intermediate-to-high or high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy. Inclusion criteria were patients with baseline characteristics matching the KEYNOTE-564 criteria. Radiomic texture-features were extracted from preoperative CT scans. Affinity-propagation clustering and random survival forest algorithms were applied to construct the RS. A radiomics-clinical-model was developed using multivariable Cox regression. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Model performance was assessed using time-dependent and integrated AUCs (iAUCs) and compared to conventional prognostic models via decision curve analysis (DCA).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 309 patients were included, split into training (247) and test (62) sets. From each patient, 1,316 radiomic features were extracted. The RS achieved an iAUC of 0.78 in the training set and 0.72 in the test set. Multivariable analysis identified node status, vascular invasion, hemoglobin, and the RS as predictors of DFS (all p<0.05). These factors formed the radiomics-clinical-model, which achieved an iAUC of 0.81(95%CI,0.76-0.85) in the training set and 0.78(95%CI,0.69-0.88) in the test set. DCA demonstrated its superior clinical utility compared to conventional prognostic models.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIntegrating radiomics with clinical factors improves DFS prediction in intermediate-to-high or high risk ccRCC. This model offers a tool for individualized risk assessment, potentially optimizing patient selection for adjuvant therapy.","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004588"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Adjuvant immunotherapy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is controversial due to the absence of reliable biomarkers for identifying patients most likely to benefit. This study aimed to develop and validate a quantitative radiomic signature (RS) and a radiomics-clinical model to identify patients at increased risk of recurrence following surgery among those eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy. METHODS This retrospective study included patients with ccRCC who are at intermediate-to-high or high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy. Inclusion criteria were patients with baseline characteristics matching the KEYNOTE-564 criteria. Radiomic texture-features were extracted from preoperative CT scans. Affinity-propagation clustering and random survival forest algorithms were applied to construct the RS. A radiomics-clinical-model was developed using multivariable Cox regression. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Model performance was assessed using time-dependent and integrated AUCs (iAUCs) and compared to conventional prognostic models via decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS A total of 309 patients were included, split into training (247) and test (62) sets. From each patient, 1,316 radiomic features were extracted. The RS achieved an iAUC of 0.78 in the training set and 0.72 in the test set. Multivariable analysis identified node status, vascular invasion, hemoglobin, and the RS as predictors of DFS (all p<0.05). These factors formed the radiomics-clinical-model, which achieved an iAUC of 0.81(95%CI,0.76-0.85) in the training set and 0.78(95%CI,0.69-0.88) in the test set. DCA demonstrated its superior clinical utility compared to conventional prognostic models. CONCLUSIONS Integrating radiomics with clinical factors improves DFS prediction in intermediate-to-high or high risk ccRCC. This model offers a tool for individualized risk assessment, potentially optimizing patient selection for adjuvant therapy.
预测高危局部肾细胞癌手术切除后复发:放射学与临床结合的方法。
目的透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)的辅助免疫治疗存在争议,因为缺乏可靠的生物标志物来确定最有可能受益的患者。本研究旨在开发和验证定量放射组学特征(RS)和放射组学-临床模型,以识别符合辅助免疫治疗条件的手术后复发风险增加的患者。方法本回顾性研究纳入了肾切除术后复发的中高、高风险的ccRCC患者。纳入标准为基线特征符合KEYNOTE-564标准的患者。从术前CT扫描中提取放射学纹理特征。采用亲和-传播聚类和随机生存森林算法构建RS,采用多变量Cox回归建立放射组学-临床模型。主要终点为无病生存期(DFS)。通过时间依赖和综合auc (iauc)评估模型的性能,并通过决策曲线分析(DCA)与传统预测模型进行比较。结果共纳入309例患者,分为训练组(247例)和测试组(62例)。从每位患者中提取1316个放射学特征。RS在训练集和测试集的iAUC分别为0.78和0.72。多变量分析发现淋巴结状态、血管浸润、血红蛋白和RS是DFS的预测因子(均p<0.05)。这些因素组成了放射组学-临床-模型,该模型在训练集的iAUC为0.81(95%CI,0.76-0.85),在测试集的iAUC为0.78(95%CI,0.69-0.88)。与传统的预后模型相比,DCA显示了其优越的临床应用。结论将放射组学与临床因素相结合,可提高中、高风险ccRCC患者的DFS预测。该模型为个性化风险评估提供了一种工具,有可能优化患者对辅助治疗的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信