Danhong Zhou, Zichun Xia, Yunxuan Chen, Jin He, Danji Zhu, Yinhuan Zhou, Zhiwei Jiang, Guoli Yang
{"title":"Accuracy of Anterior Immediate Versus Delayed Implant Placement With an Autonomous Robotic System: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Danhong Zhou, Zichun Xia, Yunxuan Chen, Jin He, Danji Zhu, Yinhuan Zhou, Zhiwei Jiang, Guoli Yang","doi":"10.1111/cid.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to compare the accuracy of an autonomous robotic system for anterior immediate and delayed implant placement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included patients who underwent anterior dental implant surgery from September 2022 to March 2025 using an autonomous robotic system. Osteotomies performed with the autonomous robotic system in this study were modified by using precision and side-cutting drills, along with repeated lifting of drills to minimize deviations. Linear and angular deviations in two- and three-dimensional space were assessed by matching preoperative planning with postoperative cone beam computed tomography. Postoperative pain and surgical satisfaction were recorded using a 100-mm visual analog scale. The Shapiro–Wilk test, Student's <i>t</i>-test, Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>-test, Pearson's Chi-Square test, and Fisher's exact test were used, and <i>p</i> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included 53 patients (65 implants) who underwent anterior dental implant surgery with the autonomous robotic system (immediate implant placement group: 19 patients, 21 implants; delayed implant placement group: 34 patients, 44 implants). Comparison of deviations in immediate and delayed implantation using the autonomous robotic system showed a mean (± SD) coronal deviation of 0.57 ± 0.19 mm versus 0.49 ± 0.20 mm (<i>p</i> = 0.129), a mean apical deviation of 0.57 ± 0.19 mm versus 0.52 ± 0.21 mm (<i>p</i> = 0.373), and a mean angular deviation of 0.53° ± 0.18° versus 0.61° ± 0.28° (<i>p</i> = 0.742). Postoperative pain and surgical satisfaction were not significantly different between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The autonomous robotic system demonstrated high and comparable accuracy in both anterior immediate and delayed implantation, with overall patient satisfaction. This could reduce the technical sensitivity of anterior immediate implant placement, enhance precision, and broaden the clinical applications of the autonomous robotic system.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to compare the accuracy of an autonomous robotic system for anterior immediate and delayed implant placement.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who underwent anterior dental implant surgery from September 2022 to March 2025 using an autonomous robotic system. Osteotomies performed with the autonomous robotic system in this study were modified by using precision and side-cutting drills, along with repeated lifting of drills to minimize deviations. Linear and angular deviations in two- and three-dimensional space were assessed by matching preoperative planning with postoperative cone beam computed tomography. Postoperative pain and surgical satisfaction were recorded using a 100-mm visual analog scale. The Shapiro–Wilk test, Student's t-test, Mann–Whitney U-test, Pearson's Chi-Square test, and Fisher's exact test were used, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
This retrospective study included 53 patients (65 implants) who underwent anterior dental implant surgery with the autonomous robotic system (immediate implant placement group: 19 patients, 21 implants; delayed implant placement group: 34 patients, 44 implants). Comparison of deviations in immediate and delayed implantation using the autonomous robotic system showed a mean (± SD) coronal deviation of 0.57 ± 0.19 mm versus 0.49 ± 0.20 mm (p = 0.129), a mean apical deviation of 0.57 ± 0.19 mm versus 0.52 ± 0.21 mm (p = 0.373), and a mean angular deviation of 0.53° ± 0.18° versus 0.61° ± 0.28° (p = 0.742). Postoperative pain and surgical satisfaction were not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
The autonomous robotic system demonstrated high and comparable accuracy in both anterior immediate and delayed implantation, with overall patient satisfaction. This could reduce the technical sensitivity of anterior immediate implant placement, enhance precision, and broaden the clinical applications of the autonomous robotic system.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal.
The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to:
New scientific developments relating to bone
Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues
Computer aided implant designs
Computer aided prosthetic designs
Immediate implant loading
Immediate implant placement
Materials relating to bone induction and conduction
New surgical methods relating to implant placement
New materials and methods relating to implant restorations
Methods for determining implant stability
A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.