Development and Psychometric Properties of Ethical Competence Questionnaire for Nursing Students

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi, Pedram Sohrabi, Mohammad Mohammadi
{"title":"Development and Psychometric Properties of Ethical Competence Questionnaire for Nursing Students","authors":"Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi,&nbsp;Pedram Sohrabi,&nbsp;Mohammad Mohammadi","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Existing tools for measuring ethical competence in nursing students have limitations, often failing to comprehensively assess the general concept and are frequently developed for practicing nurses, limiting their applicability to students. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically evaluate an ethical competence tool specifically designed for nursing students.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This methodological study employed an instrument-development approach. The process involved developing an ethical competence measure for nursing students followed by a thorough psychometric evaluation. The tool's psychometric properties were assessed using face, content, and construct validity, as well as reliability through internal consistency and stability methods. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 27, JASP version 0.14, Microsoft Excel 2007, and Amos 25.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A 26-item tool with two dimensions—“commitment to professional ethics and humanistic care” (19 items) and “interaction and cooperation in the clinical environment” (7 items)—was developed. The tool demonstrated excellent psychometric properties, explaining 68.427% of the total variance. Individual item factor loadings ranged from 0.549 to 0.875. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients for the total scale were 0.883 and 0.898, respectively, indicating high internal consistency. Test-retest reliability also yielded strong results, with the intracluster correlation coefficient calculated at 0.998 (95% CI: 0.995-0.999). The tool effectively captures key components of ethical competence in nursing students.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The newly developed tool provides a reliable and valid measure of ethical competence in nursing students. This study offers educational managers in the healthcare field a valuable resource for designing a system to assess ethical competence among Iranian nursing students.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70750","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Existing tools for measuring ethical competence in nursing students have limitations, often failing to comprehensively assess the general concept and are frequently developed for practicing nurses, limiting their applicability to students. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically evaluate an ethical competence tool specifically designed for nursing students.

Method

This methodological study employed an instrument-development approach. The process involved developing an ethical competence measure for nursing students followed by a thorough psychometric evaluation. The tool's psychometric properties were assessed using face, content, and construct validity, as well as reliability through internal consistency and stability methods. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 27, JASP version 0.14, Microsoft Excel 2007, and Amos 25.

Results

A 26-item tool with two dimensions—“commitment to professional ethics and humanistic care” (19 items) and “interaction and cooperation in the clinical environment” (7 items)—was developed. The tool demonstrated excellent psychometric properties, explaining 68.427% of the total variance. Individual item factor loadings ranged from 0.549 to 0.875. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients for the total scale were 0.883 and 0.898, respectively, indicating high internal consistency. Test-retest reliability also yielded strong results, with the intracluster correlation coefficient calculated at 0.998 (95% CI: 0.995-0.999). The tool effectively captures key components of ethical competence in nursing students.

Conclusion

The newly developed tool provides a reliable and valid measure of ethical competence in nursing students. This study offers educational managers in the healthcare field a valuable resource for designing a system to assess ethical competence among Iranian nursing students.

Abstract Image

护生道德能力问卷的编制及心理测量学特征
背景和目的现有的衡量护生道德能力的工具有局限性,往往不能全面评估一般概念,而且经常是为执业护士开发的,限制了它们对学生的适用性。本研究旨在开发一套专为护生设计的道德能力工具,并进行心理测量学评估。方法采用仪器开发方法进行方法学研究。这个过程包括为护理学生开发一个道德能力测量,然后是一个彻底的心理测量评估。该工具的心理测量特性通过面部、内容和结构效度进行评估,并通过内部一致性和稳定性方法进行信度评估。采用SPSS version 27、JASP version 0.14、Microsoft Excel 2007、Amos 25进行统计分析。结果编制了包含“职业道德与人文关怀承诺”(19项)和“临床环境中的互动与合作”(7项)两个维度的26项工具。该工具显示了出色的心理测量特性,解释了总方差的68.427%。个别项目因子负荷范围从0.549到0.875。总量表的Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.883,McDonald’s omega系数为0.898,内部一致性较高。重测信度也得到了强有力的结果,聚类内相关系数为0.998 (95% CI: 0.995-0.999)。该工具有效地捕获了护理学生道德能力的关键组成部分。结论该工具为护生道德能力的测评提供了一种可靠、有效的方法。本研究为医疗保健领域的教育管理者提供了设计一个评估伊朗护理学生道德能力的系统的宝贵资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信