Enhancing food security and livelihoods through dry season farming as a climate resilience strategy: A study in the Upper East Region of Ghana

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Faizal Adams , Ayat Ullah , Fred Nimoh , Amos Mensah , Jonathan Quaye , Emmanuel Kanzoni
{"title":"Enhancing food security and livelihoods through dry season farming as a climate resilience strategy: A study in the Upper East Region of Ghana","authors":"Faizal Adams ,&nbsp;Ayat Ullah ,&nbsp;Fred Nimoh ,&nbsp;Amos Mensah ,&nbsp;Jonathan Quaye ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Kanzoni","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the construction of small earth dams in northern Ghana to promote dry-season farming as a climate-resilient strategy, empirical evidence on their impact on farm households’ welfare remains scarce. This study examines households' decisions to participate in dry-season cropping using small dams and its implications for food security. Cross-sectional data from 275 farm households in the Upper East region of Ghana were analyzed using logistic regression and the Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Adjustment (IPWRA) model. Marginal effects indicate that market access has the highest significant positive impact (0.19, p &lt; 0.10) on participation, followed by farm training (0.18, p &lt; 0.01) and land size (0.05, p &lt; 0.05). Conversely, distance to the dam has the highest significant negative effect (−0.03, p &lt; 0.05), followed by extension access (−0.02, p &lt; 0.10) and farming experience (−0.02, p &lt; 0.01). The IPWRA results show that participation in dry-season farming reduces household food insecurity by 35.65 %, increases dietary diversity by 38.95 %, and boosts income by 17.51 % compared to non-participants. The Propensity Score Matching (PSM) robustness check confirms these findings, with food access improving by 0.491–0.581 times and dietary diversity by 0.541–0.571 times. Error analysis using PBIAS indicates a model bias of −3.42 %, suggesting a satisfactory predictive performance. To enhance participation and benefits, targeted extension services and training programs should be strengthened.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 125377"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the construction of small earth dams in northern Ghana to promote dry-season farming as a climate-resilient strategy, empirical evidence on their impact on farm households’ welfare remains scarce. This study examines households' decisions to participate in dry-season cropping using small dams and its implications for food security. Cross-sectional data from 275 farm households in the Upper East region of Ghana were analyzed using logistic regression and the Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Adjustment (IPWRA) model. Marginal effects indicate that market access has the highest significant positive impact (0.19, p < 0.10) on participation, followed by farm training (0.18, p < 0.01) and land size (0.05, p < 0.05). Conversely, distance to the dam has the highest significant negative effect (−0.03, p < 0.05), followed by extension access (−0.02, p < 0.10) and farming experience (−0.02, p < 0.01). The IPWRA results show that participation in dry-season farming reduces household food insecurity by 35.65 %, increases dietary diversity by 38.95 %, and boosts income by 17.51 % compared to non-participants. The Propensity Score Matching (PSM) robustness check confirms these findings, with food access improving by 0.491–0.581 times and dietary diversity by 0.541–0.571 times. Error analysis using PBIAS indicates a model bias of −3.42 %, suggesting a satisfactory predictive performance. To enhance participation and benefits, targeted extension services and training programs should be strengthened.
通过旱季农业作为一种气候适应战略来加强粮食安全和生计:加纳上东部地区的一项研究
尽管在加纳北部建造了小型土坝,以促进旱季农业,作为一项气候适应战略,但关于它们对农户福利影响的经验证据仍然很少。本研究考察了农户参与旱季小水坝种植的决定及其对粮食安全的影响。采用logistic回归和逆概率加权回归调整(IPWRA)模型对加纳上东部地区275户农户的横截面数据进行了分析。边际效应表明市场准入具有最高的显著正向影响(0.19,p <;0.10),其次是农场培训(0.18,p <;0.01)和土地面积(0.05,p <;0.05)。相反,距离大坝的负向影响最大(- 0.03,p <;0.05),其次是扩展访问(- 0.02,p <;0.10)和养殖经验(- 0.02,p <;0.01)。IPWRA的结果显示,与不参与旱季农业的人相比,参与旱季农业的家庭粮食不安全状况减少了35.65%,膳食多样性增加了38.95%,收入增加了17.51%。倾向得分匹配(PSM)稳健性检验证实了这些发现,食物可及性提高了0.491-0.581倍,饮食多样性提高了0.541-0.571倍。使用PBIAS进行的误差分析表明,模型偏差为−3.42%,表明预测性能令人满意。为提高参与率和效益,应加强有针对性的推广服务和培训项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信