Does masking alter the mismatch negativity response to gaps?

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Victoria Duda , Thomas M.D. Augereau , Kenneth Campbell , Amineh Koravand
{"title":"Does masking alter the mismatch negativity response to gaps?","authors":"Victoria Duda ,&nbsp;Thomas M.D. Augereau ,&nbsp;Kenneth Campbell ,&nbsp;Amineh Koravand","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Difficulties perceiving speech in noise can be studied using temporal resolution measures. This study investigates the processing of silent gaps in the central auditory system in various noise conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Event-related potentials and psychoacoustic thresholds were measured in 14 normal hearing adult subjects. A multi-deviant paradigm was used to present an 80 <!--> <!-->dB SPL standard stimulus and a series of gapped deviants with gap durations ranging from 2 to 40 <!--> <!-->ms. The stimuli were presented in three noise conditions in which the noise (i.e. the masker) was either absent, presented at a low intensity (60 <!--> <!-->dB SPL) or high intensity (80 <!--> <!-->dB SPL). A composite N1 + mismatch negativity called a deviant-related negativity (DRN) and the following positive component (P2) measured peak-to-peak were compared to behavioral accuracy rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The amplitude of the DRN-P2 increased as gap duration increased in the no and low masking conditions. However, this was not the case in the high masking condition. Behavioral gap detection correlated with all masking conditions. However, with high intensity masking, the gap detection accuracy was reduced, and the peak-to-peak measurement was no longer able to reliably code the temporal aspects of the signal.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrates that high masking noise make the detection of gaps very difficult as demonstrated by using electrophysiology and behavioural measures. However, low levels of masking have little effect on the presence of the gap and the auditory system appears to withstand some level of noise with results similar to no masking at all.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":"1859 ","pages":"Article 149651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899325002100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Difficulties perceiving speech in noise can be studied using temporal resolution measures. This study investigates the processing of silent gaps in the central auditory system in various noise conditions.

Methods

Event-related potentials and psychoacoustic thresholds were measured in 14 normal hearing adult subjects. A multi-deviant paradigm was used to present an 80  dB SPL standard stimulus and a series of gapped deviants with gap durations ranging from 2 to 40  ms. The stimuli were presented in three noise conditions in which the noise (i.e. the masker) was either absent, presented at a low intensity (60  dB SPL) or high intensity (80  dB SPL). A composite N1 + mismatch negativity called a deviant-related negativity (DRN) and the following positive component (P2) measured peak-to-peak were compared to behavioral accuracy rates.

Results

The amplitude of the DRN-P2 increased as gap duration increased in the no and low masking conditions. However, this was not the case in the high masking condition. Behavioral gap detection correlated with all masking conditions. However, with high intensity masking, the gap detection accuracy was reduced, and the peak-to-peak measurement was no longer able to reliably code the temporal aspects of the signal.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that high masking noise make the detection of gaps very difficult as demonstrated by using electrophysiology and behavioural measures. However, low levels of masking have little effect on the presence of the gap and the auditory system appears to withstand some level of noise with results similar to no masking at all.

Abstract Image

掩蔽是否改变了对差距的错配负性反应?
目的利用时间分辨率测量方法研究噪声环境下语音感知的困难。本研究探讨了不同噪声条件下中央听觉系统对沉默间隙的加工。方法测定14例正常听力成人的7相关电位和心理声学阈值。采用多偏差范式,分别呈现80 dB声压级标准刺激和一系列间隔偏差,间隔持续时间为2 ~ 40 ms。刺激在三种噪音条件下呈现,其中噪音(即掩蔽物)要么没有,要么以低强度(60 dB SPL)呈现,要么以高强度(80 dB SPL)呈现。将复合N1 +错配负性称为偏差相关负性(DRN)和随后测量的峰对峰正性分量(P2)与行为正确率进行比较。结果在无掩蔽和低掩蔽条件下,DRN-P2的振幅随间隙持续时间的增加而增加。然而,在高掩蔽条件下,情况并非如此。行为间隙检测与所有掩蔽条件相关。然而,在高强度掩蔽下,间隙检测精度降低,峰对峰测量不再能够可靠地编码信号的时间方面。本研究表明,高掩蔽噪声使得间隙的检测非常困难,正如电生理学和行为测量所证明的那样。然而,低水平的掩蔽对间隙的存在几乎没有影响,听觉系统似乎能够承受一定程度的噪音,结果与完全没有掩蔽相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Research
Brain Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
268
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences. Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed. With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信