Clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis and atopic cough: 5-year real-world surveillance

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Jinming Qiu, Bingquan Jian, Xiaoqian Xin, Guopeng Tang
{"title":"Clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis and atopic cough: 5-year real-world surveillance","authors":"Jinming Qiu,&nbsp;Bingquan Jian,&nbsp;Xiaoqian Xin,&nbsp;Guopeng Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2025.104624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Atopic cough (AC) is a prevalent allergic condition, frequently observed in children with allergic rhinitis (AR) seeking treatment at our clinical department. Hence, the primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of house dust mite (HDM)-sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in managing AC, offering a novel therapeutic strategy for its treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective study enrolled 103 children diagnosed with AR and AC. Among them, 55 children underwent a 3-year course of SLIT (SLIT group), while 48 children received only symptomatic drug therapy (control group). Treatment initiation for both groups was in 2019, with annual on-site follow-up visits conducted until 2024 to evaluate treatment efficacy and safety. The comparison of efficacy evaluation indicators between the SLIT group and the control group encompassed the total nasal symptoms score (TNSS), daytime cough symptom score (daytime CSS), nighttime cough symptom score (nighttime CSS), cough evaluation test (CET) score, the total medication score (TMS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Furthermore, the long-term efficacy of a 3-year SLIT treatment was evaluated. Safety was assessed based on adverse events (AEs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All efficacy indicators exhibited no significant differences at baseline (all <em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). The TNSS in the SLIT group demonstrated a significant reduction compared to baseline across the study period (2019–2024) (all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). In contrast, the decrease in TNSS in the control group was less pronounced than in the SLIT group, with a noticeable rebound in 2024. Regarding AC assessment, the daytime/nighttime CSS in the SLIT group remained consistently lower both during the SLIT treatment phase and post-SLIT discontinuation, while the control group displayed a rebounding trend, albeit without statistical significance (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). Furthermore, CET score in the SLIT group remained consistently low from the initiation of SLIT treatment until 2024, whereas the control group experienced a significant rebound (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), indicating deteriorating cough symptoms. In the comprehensive evaluation of treatment efficacy, a significant decrease in TMS and VAS score was observed in the SLIT group throughout the study duration (all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), whereas the control group exhibited varying degrees of rebound in TMS and VAS score in 2023 and 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Compared to treatment with symptomatic medication alone, a 3-year course of HDM-SLIT exhibited superior efficacy in managing AC, both during the treatment period and following treatment discontinuation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"46 4","pages":"Article 104624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070925000274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Atopic cough (AC) is a prevalent allergic condition, frequently observed in children with allergic rhinitis (AR) seeking treatment at our clinical department. Hence, the primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of house dust mite (HDM)-sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in managing AC, offering a novel therapeutic strategy for its treatment.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study enrolled 103 children diagnosed with AR and AC. Among them, 55 children underwent a 3-year course of SLIT (SLIT group), while 48 children received only symptomatic drug therapy (control group). Treatment initiation for both groups was in 2019, with annual on-site follow-up visits conducted until 2024 to evaluate treatment efficacy and safety. The comparison of efficacy evaluation indicators between the SLIT group and the control group encompassed the total nasal symptoms score (TNSS), daytime cough symptom score (daytime CSS), nighttime cough symptom score (nighttime CSS), cough evaluation test (CET) score, the total medication score (TMS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Furthermore, the long-term efficacy of a 3-year SLIT treatment was evaluated. Safety was assessed based on adverse events (AEs).

Results

All efficacy indicators exhibited no significant differences at baseline (all p > 0.05). The TNSS in the SLIT group demonstrated a significant reduction compared to baseline across the study period (2019–2024) (all p < 0.001). In contrast, the decrease in TNSS in the control group was less pronounced than in the SLIT group, with a noticeable rebound in 2024. Regarding AC assessment, the daytime/nighttime CSS in the SLIT group remained consistently lower both during the SLIT treatment phase and post-SLIT discontinuation, while the control group displayed a rebounding trend, albeit without statistical significance (p > 0.05). Furthermore, CET score in the SLIT group remained consistently low from the initiation of SLIT treatment until 2024, whereas the control group experienced a significant rebound (p < 0.001), indicating deteriorating cough symptoms. In the comprehensive evaluation of treatment efficacy, a significant decrease in TMS and VAS score was observed in the SLIT group throughout the study duration (all p < 0.001), whereas the control group exhibited varying degrees of rebound in TMS and VAS score in 2023 and 2024.

Conclusion

Compared to treatment with symptomatic medication alone, a 3-year course of HDM-SLIT exhibited superior efficacy in managing AC, both during the treatment period and following treatment discontinuation.
舌下免疫治疗变应性鼻炎和特应性咳嗽的临床疗效:5年真实世界监测
目的:特应性咳嗽(AC)是一种常见的过敏性疾病,常见于求医的过敏性鼻炎(AR)患儿。因此,本研究的主要目的是评估屋尘螨(HDM)-舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)治疗AC的有效性和安全性,为其治疗提供一种新的治疗策略。材料与方法本回顾性研究纳入103例诊断为AR和AC的儿童,其中55例儿童接受3年的SLIT治疗(SLIT组),48例儿童仅接受对症药物治疗(对照组)。两组患者均于2019年开始治疗,每年进行现场随访,直至2024年,以评估治疗疗效和安全性。SLIT组与对照组疗效评价指标的比较包括:总鼻症状评分(TNSS)、日间咳嗽症状评分(CSS)、夜间咳嗽症状评分(CSS)、咳嗽评价试验(CET)评分、总用药评分(TMS)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分。此外,评估了3年SLIT治疗的长期疗效。安全性根据不良事件(ae)进行评估。结果两组疗效指标在基线时无显著差异(p >;0.05)。与整个研究期间(2019-2024)的基线相比,SLIT组的TNSS显着降低(所有p <;0.001)。相比之下,对照组的TNSS下降不如SLIT组明显,在2024年出现明显反弹。在AC评估方面,SLIT组的日间/夜间CSS在SLIT治疗阶段和SLIT停药后始终保持较低水平,而对照组呈现反弹趋势,但无统计学意义(p >;0.05)。此外,从SLIT治疗开始到2024年,SLIT组的CET得分一直很低,而对照组则出现了显著的反弹(p <;0.001),表明咳嗽症状恶化。在综合评价治疗效果时,观察到SLIT组在整个研究期间TMS和VAS评分显著下降(p <;0.001),而对照组在2023年和2024年TMS和VAS评分出现不同程度的反弹。结论与单纯对症药物治疗相比,3年疗程的HDM-SLIT在治疗期间和停药后治疗AC的疗效均优于单纯对症药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信