The facilitating and hindering factors of pre-implementation phase in establishment of clinical decision support systems: A systematic review and meta synthesis

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Erfan Shakibaei Bonakdeh , Amrik Sohal , Vida Kardan Moghadam , Koorosh Rajabkhah , Daniel Prajogo , Angela Melder , Quy Nguyen , Gordon Bingham , Erica Tong
{"title":"The facilitating and hindering factors of pre-implementation phase in establishment of clinical decision support systems: A systematic review and meta synthesis","authors":"Erfan Shakibaei Bonakdeh ,&nbsp;Amrik Sohal ,&nbsp;Vida Kardan Moghadam ,&nbsp;Koorosh Rajabkhah ,&nbsp;Daniel Prajogo ,&nbsp;Angela Melder ,&nbsp;Quy Nguyen ,&nbsp;Gordon Bingham ,&nbsp;Erica Tong","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.101014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are increasingly adopted in healthcare; however, their success and uptake among healthcare workers vary significantly across different contexts. This systematic review aims to identify and synthesise literature on the facilitating and hindering factors influencing the establishment of CDSS during the pre-implementation phase in hospital settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Five major databases were searched for relevant studies published from January 2010 to July 2024. All steps, including screening, data extraction, quality appraisal, and synthesis, were conducted independently by two authors. The quality appraisal used the JBI checklist for qualitative studies [<span><span>1</span></span>]. Data on study characteristics and determinant factors were extracted, and a deductive meta-synthesis categorised these determinants into five dimensions of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Sciences (CFIR). The grey literature was also searched for prospective studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 12,010 papers were identified from the databases, of which 21 papers were systematically reviewed and synthesised. The data from the included studies were organised into five main themes based on the CFIR framework: Inner Setting, Intervention Process, Intervention Characteristics, Individual Characteristics, and Outer Setting.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite the longstanding existence of CDSS and extensive literature in this area, there is limited evidence on the determinants of CDSS from an implementation science perspective, particularly in less digitally developed healthcare systems. Moreover, existing literature lacks a focused analysis of the different phases of CDSS establishment (Adoption, Pre-implementation, Implementation, Maintenance, and Promotion). Future research should aim to develop a more granular understanding of the determinants influencing CDSS establishment across various contexts and phases.</div><div>Public summary</div><div>The healthcare sector is transitioning from paper-based medical records to the digitalisation of not only medical records but also all patient journey pathways. Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) are one of the digital solutions designed to assist clinicians by reminding them of critical information essential for decision-making. However, many CDSS implementations have failed to achieve their intended purpose, resulting in minimal impact on expected outcomes.</div><div>In exploring the reasons for this, we found that the willingness and capacity of clinicians, managers, hospitals, and the healthcare sector as a whole are crucial determinants of CDSS success. The pre-implementation stage is particularly critical before rolling out any selected technology. During this phase, it is essential to customise the CDSS to align with internal processes, enhance IT capacities, engage clinicians in the decision-making process, and develop comprehensive plans to oversee these actions effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"14 3","pages":"Article 101014"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883725000425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are increasingly adopted in healthcare; however, their success and uptake among healthcare workers vary significantly across different contexts. This systematic review aims to identify and synthesise literature on the facilitating and hindering factors influencing the establishment of CDSS during the pre-implementation phase in hospital settings.

Methods

Five major databases were searched for relevant studies published from January 2010 to July 2024. All steps, including screening, data extraction, quality appraisal, and synthesis, were conducted independently by two authors. The quality appraisal used the JBI checklist for qualitative studies [1]. Data on study characteristics and determinant factors were extracted, and a deductive meta-synthesis categorised these determinants into five dimensions of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Sciences (CFIR). The grey literature was also searched for prospective studies.

Results

A total of 12,010 papers were identified from the databases, of which 21 papers were systematically reviewed and synthesised. The data from the included studies were organised into five main themes based on the CFIR framework: Inner Setting, Intervention Process, Intervention Characteristics, Individual Characteristics, and Outer Setting.

Conclusion

Despite the longstanding existence of CDSS and extensive literature in this area, there is limited evidence on the determinants of CDSS from an implementation science perspective, particularly in less digitally developed healthcare systems. Moreover, existing literature lacks a focused analysis of the different phases of CDSS establishment (Adoption, Pre-implementation, Implementation, Maintenance, and Promotion). Future research should aim to develop a more granular understanding of the determinants influencing CDSS establishment across various contexts and phases.
Public summary
The healthcare sector is transitioning from paper-based medical records to the digitalisation of not only medical records but also all patient journey pathways. Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) are one of the digital solutions designed to assist clinicians by reminding them of critical information essential for decision-making. However, many CDSS implementations have failed to achieve their intended purpose, resulting in minimal impact on expected outcomes.
In exploring the reasons for this, we found that the willingness and capacity of clinicians, managers, hospitals, and the healthcare sector as a whole are crucial determinants of CDSS success. The pre-implementation stage is particularly critical before rolling out any selected technology. During this phase, it is essential to customise the CDSS to align with internal processes, enhance IT capacities, engage clinicians in the decision-making process, and develop comprehensive plans to oversee these actions effectively.
临床决策支持系统实施前阶段的促进与阻碍因素:系统综述与meta综合
临床决策支持系统(CDSS)越来越多地应用于医疗保健;然而,它们在卫生保健工作者中的成功和吸收在不同的背景下差异很大。本系统综述旨在识别和综合文献的促进和阻碍因素,影响建立在医院设置的前期实施阶段的CDSS。方法检索2010年1月~ 2024年7月发表的相关文献。所有步骤,包括筛选、数据提取、质量评估和综合,均由两位作者独立进行。质量评价使用JBI检查表进行定性研究bbb。研究人员提取了研究特征和决定因素的数据,并将这些决定因素归纳为实施科学综合框架(CFIR)的五个维度。灰色文献也被用于前瞻性研究。结果共收录论文12010篇,其中系统综述和综合了21篇。纳入研究的数据根据CFIR框架分为五个主题:内部环境、干预过程、干预特征、个体特征和外部环境。尽管CDSS长期存在并且在该领域有大量文献,但从实施科学的角度来看,CDSS的决定因素证据有限,特别是在数字发达程度较低的医疗系统中。此外,现有文献缺乏对CDSS建立的不同阶段(采用、预实施、实施、维护和推广)的重点分析。未来的研究应旨在更细致地了解影响CDSS在不同背景和阶段建立的决定因素。医疗保健行业正在从纸质医疗记录向数字化过渡,不仅是医疗记录,还有所有病人的旅程路径。临床决策支持系统(CDSS)是一种数字化解决方案,旨在通过提醒临床医生决策所必需的关键信息来帮助他们。然而,许多CDSS实施未能达到其预期目的,对预期结果的影响微乎其微。在探索其原因时,我们发现临床医生、管理人员、医院和整个医疗保健部门的意愿和能力是CDSS成功的关键决定因素。在推出任何选定的技术之前,实施前阶段尤为关键。在这一阶段,必须定制CDSS,使其与内部流程保持一致,增强it能力,让临床医生参与决策过程,并制定全面的计划来有效地监督这些行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信