Why are threatening experiences remembered so well? Insights into memory strengthening from protocols of gradual aversive learning

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Patricia Tezanos , José Luis Trejo
{"title":"Why are threatening experiences remembered so well? Insights into memory strengthening from protocols of gradual aversive learning","authors":"Patricia Tezanos ,&nbsp;José Luis Trejo","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aversive experiences often result in strong and persistent memory traces, which can sometimes lead to conditions such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder or phobias. Aversive stimulation tests are key tools in psychology and neuroscience for studying learning and memory. These tests typically use electric shocks as the unconditioned stimulus, allowing for precise control over the aversive content of the learning event. This feature has led to extensive research applying these tests with varying shock intensities to examine differences in learning, behavior, and memory formation between low- and high-aversive experiences. This line of research is particularly valuable for understanding the neurobiology underlying memory strengthening, but, to our knowledge, no review has yet compiled and organized the findings from this specific methodology. In this comprehensive review, we focus primarily on animal studies that have employed the same aversive test (i.e. Fear Conditioning, Passive Avoidance, Active Avoidance or Operant boxes) at different intensities. We will first outline and briefly describe the main aversive learning paradigms used in this field. Next, we will examine the relationship between aversiveness and memory strength. Finally, we will explore the neurobiological insights these studies have revealed over the years. Our aim is to gain a better understanding of how the nervous system gradually strengthens memory, while also addressing the remaining gaps and challenges in this area of research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 106145"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425001459","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aversive experiences often result in strong and persistent memory traces, which can sometimes lead to conditions such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder or phobias. Aversive stimulation tests are key tools in psychology and neuroscience for studying learning and memory. These tests typically use electric shocks as the unconditioned stimulus, allowing for precise control over the aversive content of the learning event. This feature has led to extensive research applying these tests with varying shock intensities to examine differences in learning, behavior, and memory formation between low- and high-aversive experiences. This line of research is particularly valuable for understanding the neurobiology underlying memory strengthening, but, to our knowledge, no review has yet compiled and organized the findings from this specific methodology. In this comprehensive review, we focus primarily on animal studies that have employed the same aversive test (i.e. Fear Conditioning, Passive Avoidance, Active Avoidance or Operant boxes) at different intensities. We will first outline and briefly describe the main aversive learning paradigms used in this field. Next, we will examine the relationship between aversiveness and memory strength. Finally, we will explore the neurobiological insights these studies have revealed over the years. Our aim is to gain a better understanding of how the nervous system gradually strengthens memory, while also addressing the remaining gaps and challenges in this area of research.
为什么受到威胁的经历记忆如此深刻?从渐进式厌恶学习协议看记忆强化
令人厌恶的经历往往会导致强烈而持久的记忆痕迹,有时会导致创伤后应激障碍或恐惧症等病症。厌恶刺激测试是心理学和神经科学研究学习和记忆的关键工具。这些测试通常使用电击作为非条件刺激,允许对学习事件的厌恶内容进行精确控制。这一特点导致了广泛的研究应用这些测试不同的冲击强度,以检查在学习,行为和记忆形成的差异在低和高厌恶的经验。这条研究路线对于理解记忆强化背后的神经生物学特别有价值,但是,据我们所知,还没有一篇综述汇编和组织了这种特定方法的发现。在这篇综合综述中,我们主要关注采用不同强度的相同厌恶测试(即恐惧条件反射、被动回避、主动回避或操作性盒子)的动物研究。我们将首先概述并简要描述该领域中使用的主要厌恶学习范式。接下来,我们将研究厌恶和记忆强度之间的关系。最后,我们将探讨这些研究多年来揭示的神经生物学见解。我们的目标是更好地理解神经系统是如何逐渐增强记忆的,同时也解决了这一研究领域的空白和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信