Nishatabbbas Rehmatulla , Kelly Schwarz , Fatemeh Habibi Nameghi
{"title":"Revisiting the role of private voluntary standards and initiatives in decarbonising shipping","authors":"Nishatabbbas Rehmatulla , Kelly Schwarz , Fatemeh Habibi Nameghi","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Private voluntary action and governance, referred to as ‘private standards’ have the potential to address social and environmental challenges such as climate change. Previous research on the role of private standards in decarbonising shipping showed that they suffered from low levels of transparency, ambition and data reliability, undermining the environmental effectiveness of the standards. In this study, content analysis revealed that the recently implemented private standards are more transparent, reliable, and ambitious than previous standards and interviews revealed the key drivers for this improvement. Interviews revealed the drivers for improvement include customer or stakeholder value chain pressure to be more environmental-friendly and the need for a shared reporting methodology. The involvement of neutral facilitators, diverse range of stakeholders, academic actors and science helped to improve the ambition and coverage of the private standards. The IMO’s GHG strategies have also been a catalyst for private sector action albeit at a collective level through private standards. However, a critical evaluation of these standards shows that there remain significant shortcomings and challenges in most of the standards across all three criteria. With the Revised IMO GHG strategy and the weak policy measures just agreed and set to be implemented in a couple of years, private standards have a greater responsibility for early and ambitious action to enable the sector’s transition during the emergence phase.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 106707"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25001228","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Private voluntary action and governance, referred to as ‘private standards’ have the potential to address social and environmental challenges such as climate change. Previous research on the role of private standards in decarbonising shipping showed that they suffered from low levels of transparency, ambition and data reliability, undermining the environmental effectiveness of the standards. In this study, content analysis revealed that the recently implemented private standards are more transparent, reliable, and ambitious than previous standards and interviews revealed the key drivers for this improvement. Interviews revealed the drivers for improvement include customer or stakeholder value chain pressure to be more environmental-friendly and the need for a shared reporting methodology. The involvement of neutral facilitators, diverse range of stakeholders, academic actors and science helped to improve the ambition and coverage of the private standards. The IMO’s GHG strategies have also been a catalyst for private sector action albeit at a collective level through private standards. However, a critical evaluation of these standards shows that there remain significant shortcomings and challenges in most of the standards across all three criteria. With the Revised IMO GHG strategy and the weak policy measures just agreed and set to be implemented in a couple of years, private standards have a greater responsibility for early and ambitious action to enable the sector’s transition during the emergence phase.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.