Revisiting the role of private voluntary standards and initiatives in decarbonising shipping

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Nishatabbbas Rehmatulla , Kelly Schwarz , Fatemeh Habibi Nameghi
{"title":"Revisiting the role of private voluntary standards and initiatives in decarbonising shipping","authors":"Nishatabbbas Rehmatulla ,&nbsp;Kelly Schwarz ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Habibi Nameghi","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Private voluntary action and governance, referred to as ‘private standards’ have the potential to address social and environmental challenges such as climate change. Previous research on the role of private standards in decarbonising shipping showed that they suffered from low levels of transparency, ambition and data reliability, undermining the environmental effectiveness of the standards. In this study, content analysis revealed that the recently implemented private standards are more transparent, reliable, and ambitious than previous standards and interviews revealed the key drivers for this improvement. Interviews revealed the drivers for improvement include customer or stakeholder value chain pressure to be more environmental-friendly and the need for a shared reporting methodology. The involvement of neutral facilitators, diverse range of stakeholders, academic actors and science helped to improve the ambition and coverage of the private standards. The IMO’s GHG strategies have also been a catalyst for private sector action albeit at a collective level through private standards. However, a critical evaluation of these standards shows that there remain significant shortcomings and challenges in most of the standards across all three criteria. With the Revised IMO GHG strategy and the weak policy measures just agreed and set to be implemented in a couple of years, private standards have a greater responsibility for early and ambitious action to enable the sector’s transition during the emergence phase.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 106707"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25001228","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Private voluntary action and governance, referred to as ‘private standards’ have the potential to address social and environmental challenges such as climate change. Previous research on the role of private standards in decarbonising shipping showed that they suffered from low levels of transparency, ambition and data reliability, undermining the environmental effectiveness of the standards. In this study, content analysis revealed that the recently implemented private standards are more transparent, reliable, and ambitious than previous standards and interviews revealed the key drivers for this improvement. Interviews revealed the drivers for improvement include customer or stakeholder value chain pressure to be more environmental-friendly and the need for a shared reporting methodology. The involvement of neutral facilitators, diverse range of stakeholders, academic actors and science helped to improve the ambition and coverage of the private standards. The IMO’s GHG strategies have also been a catalyst for private sector action albeit at a collective level through private standards. However, a critical evaluation of these standards shows that there remain significant shortcomings and challenges in most of the standards across all three criteria. With the Revised IMO GHG strategy and the weak policy measures just agreed and set to be implemented in a couple of years, private standards have a greater responsibility for early and ambitious action to enable the sector’s transition during the emergence phase.
重新审视私人自愿标准和倡议在航运脱碳中的作用
被称为“私人标准”的私人自愿行动和治理具有解决气候变化等社会和环境挑战的潜力。之前关于私人标准在脱碳航运中的作用的研究表明,它们的透明度、雄心和数据可靠性都很低,破坏了标准的环境有效性。在这项研究中,内容分析显示,最近实施的私人标准比以前的标准更加透明、可靠和雄心勃勃,访谈揭示了这种改进的关键驱动因素。访谈显示,推动改进的因素包括客户或利益相关者对价值链更加环保的压力,以及对共享报告方法的需求。中立的促进者、各种利益攸关方、学术行为体和科学的参与有助于提高私人标准的雄心和覆盖面。国际海事组织的温室气体战略也成为私营部门行动的催化剂,尽管是通过私营标准在集体层面上采取行动。然而,对这些标准的批判性评估表明,在所有三个标准中,大多数标准仍然存在显著的缺点和挑战。鉴于国际海事组织修订的温室气体战略和刚刚商定并将在几年内实施的薄弱政策措施,私营标准在早期和雄心勃勃的行动中负有更大的责任,以使该行业在新兴阶段实现转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信