Dynamic Strategifying: How do Chief Purpose Officers make purpose strategic and strategy purposeful?

IF 7.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Nicole Steller , Albena Björck
{"title":"Dynamic Strategifying: How do Chief Purpose Officers make purpose strategic and strategy purposeful?","authors":"Nicole Steller ,&nbsp;Albena Björck","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing institutionalization of corporate purpose by appointing Chief Purpose Officers (CPOs) signifies a pivotal transition in corporate priorities, emphasizing the imperative of purpose-driven management. The literature highlights the crucial relationship between strategy and purpose, where strategy embeds purpose within organizational frameworks and purpose guides strategic decision-making. However, knowledge about practices that couple purpose and strategy is scarce. Primary research has not addressed elite strategists responsible for embedding purpose to examine their work through which purpose becomes strategic. Based on 44 in-depth interviews with CPOs from various industries, company sizes, and countries, our study is the first empirical investigation into the strategic practice of CPOs. Grounded in the Strategy-as-Practice tradition, we focus on the phase of strategy emergence and identify strategifying work, wherein new notions, such as purpose, are coupled with strategy. Our results showcase a diverse range of strategic practices presented by CPOs around four interrelated dimensions – cognitive, emotional, relational, and material – altering the strategic boundaries of the organization. The contributions of our study are threefold. First, we introduce the double-loop interaction between a notion, in our case, purpose and strategy, emphasizing a dynamic perspective on strategifying. Second, we expand the strategifying framework by <em>Emotional Coupling</em>, highlighting emotions’ role in coupling purpose and strategy. Third, we contribute to the emerging purpose literature by demonstrating how the four dimensions of strategifying work are interrelated and overlapping, collectively shaping and reinforcing a culture of purposefulness within the organization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"58 3","pages":"Article 102532"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Long Range Planning","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630125000354","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing institutionalization of corporate purpose by appointing Chief Purpose Officers (CPOs) signifies a pivotal transition in corporate priorities, emphasizing the imperative of purpose-driven management. The literature highlights the crucial relationship between strategy and purpose, where strategy embeds purpose within organizational frameworks and purpose guides strategic decision-making. However, knowledge about practices that couple purpose and strategy is scarce. Primary research has not addressed elite strategists responsible for embedding purpose to examine their work through which purpose becomes strategic. Based on 44 in-depth interviews with CPOs from various industries, company sizes, and countries, our study is the first empirical investigation into the strategic practice of CPOs. Grounded in the Strategy-as-Practice tradition, we focus on the phase of strategy emergence and identify strategifying work, wherein new notions, such as purpose, are coupled with strategy. Our results showcase a diverse range of strategic practices presented by CPOs around four interrelated dimensions – cognitive, emotional, relational, and material – altering the strategic boundaries of the organization. The contributions of our study are threefold. First, we introduce the double-loop interaction between a notion, in our case, purpose and strategy, emphasizing a dynamic perspective on strategifying. Second, we expand the strategifying framework by Emotional Coupling, highlighting emotions’ role in coupling purpose and strategy. Third, we contribute to the emerging purpose literature by demonstrating how the four dimensions of strategifying work are interrelated and overlapping, collectively shaping and reinforcing a culture of purposefulness within the organization.
动态战略:首席目标官如何使目标具有战略性,使战略具有目的性?
通过任命首席目标官(Chief purpose officer, CPOs),企业目标日益制度化,标志着企业优先事项的关键转变,强调了目标驱动型管理的必要性。文献强调了战略和目标之间的关键关系,其中战略将目标嵌入组织框架,目标指导战略决策。然而,关于将目的和策略结合起来的实践的知识很少。主要的研究没有涉及负责嵌入目标的精英战略家,以检查他们的工作,通过这些目标成为战略。基于对44位来自不同行业、不同公司规模和不同国家的首席营销官的深度访谈,我们的研究首次对首席营销官的战略实践进行了实证调查。在“战略即实践”传统的基础上,我们将重点放在战略产生阶段,并确定战略制定工作,其中新概念,如目的,与战略相结合。我们的研究结果显示,cpo围绕四个相互关联的维度——认知、情感、关系和物质——提出了各种各样的战略实践,改变了组织的战略边界。我们的研究有三方面的贡献。首先,我们介绍了一个概念,在我们的案例中,目的和策略之间的双循环互动,强调了战略制定的动态视角。其次,我们通过情感耦合扩展了策略框架,强调了情感在目标和策略耦合中的作用。第三,我们通过展示战略工作的四个维度如何相互关联和重叠,共同塑造和加强组织内的目标文化,为新兴的目标文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Long Range Planning (LRP) is an internationally renowned journal specializing in the field of strategic management. Since its establishment in 1968, the journal has consistently published original research, garnering a strong reputation among academics. LRP actively encourages the submission of articles that involve empirical research and theoretical perspectives, including studies that provide critical assessments and analysis of the current state of knowledge in crucial strategic areas. The primary user base of LRP primarily comprises individuals from academic backgrounds, with the journal playing a dual role within this community. Firstly, it serves as a platform for the dissemination of research findings among academic researchers. Secondly, it serves as a channel for the transmission of ideas that can be effectively utilized in educational settings. The articles published in LRP cater to a diverse audience, including practicing managers and students in professional programs. While some articles may focus on practical applications, others may primarily target academic researchers. LRP adopts an inclusive approach to empirical research, accepting studies that draw on various methodologies such as primary survey data, archival data, case studies, and recognized approaches to data collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信