Trends in couples’ educational pairings and marital dissolution: Evidence from South Korea

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Sangsoo Lee
{"title":"Trends in couples’ educational pairings and marital dissolution: Evidence from South Korea","authors":"Sangsoo Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.rssm.2025.101041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how heterosexual married couples’ educational pairings – where the wife is more, less, or equally educated compared to her husband – relate to divorce risk and how these patterns have changed over time. While a growing body of research has documented these trends in Western societies, it remains uncertain whether similar patterns exist in non-Western contexts with more traditional gender norms. In addition, little research has differentiated between marriages where both spouses have high levels of education and those where both have low levels of education, as both types of marriages have been classified as educational homogamy. To address these gaps, this study analyzes marriage and divorce registration data to examine changes in couples’ educational pairings and marital dissolution in South Korea between the 1991 and 2018 marriage cohorts. The findings reveal that although female hypogamy used to be associated with a higher divorce risk than hypergamy, this gap has been narrowing and is nearly closed among those married in the 2010s. Moreover, the gap in divorce risk between college-educated and non-college-educated homogamous couples has been widening.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47384,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 101041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562425000320","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how heterosexual married couples’ educational pairings – where the wife is more, less, or equally educated compared to her husband – relate to divorce risk and how these patterns have changed over time. While a growing body of research has documented these trends in Western societies, it remains uncertain whether similar patterns exist in non-Western contexts with more traditional gender norms. In addition, little research has differentiated between marriages where both spouses have high levels of education and those where both have low levels of education, as both types of marriages have been classified as educational homogamy. To address these gaps, this study analyzes marriage and divorce registration data to examine changes in couples’ educational pairings and marital dissolution in South Korea between the 1991 and 2018 marriage cohorts. The findings reveal that although female hypogamy used to be associated with a higher divorce risk than hypergamy, this gap has been narrowing and is nearly closed among those married in the 2010s. Moreover, the gap in divorce risk between college-educated and non-college-educated homogamous couples has been widening.
夫妻教育配对与婚姻破裂的趋势:来自韩国的证据
这项研究调查了异性恋夫妇的受教育程度——妻子的受教育程度比丈夫高、低或相同——与离婚风险之间的关系,以及这些模式是如何随着时间的推移而变化的。虽然越来越多的研究记录了西方社会的这些趋势,但仍不确定在非西方社会中是否存在更传统的性别规范。此外,很少有研究区分夫妻双方受教育程度高的婚姻和夫妻双方受教育程度低的婚姻,因为这两种婚姻都被归类为受教育程度高的同性婚姻。为了解决这些差距,本研究分析了婚姻和离婚登记数据,以检查1991年至2018年韩国婚姻队列中夫妻教育配对和婚姻解散的变化。研究结果显示,尽管女性的一夫多妻制曾经比一夫多妻制与更高的离婚风险相关,但这一差距正在缩小,在2010年代结婚的女性中几乎已经消失。此外,受过大学教育和没有受过大学教育的同性伴侣之间的离婚风险差距一直在扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility is dedicated to publishing the highest, most innovative research on issues of social inequality from a broad diversity of theoretical and methodological perspectives. The journal is also dedicated to cutting edge summaries of prior research and fruitful exchanges that will stimulate future research on issues of social inequality. The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信