Acoustic Enhancer Microbubble Cavitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Treatment for Urolithiasis.

Wesley A Mayer,Thomas Chi,Scott Wiener,Christopher H Cantrill,Julio G Davalos,Hemendra N Shah,Marshall L Stoller
{"title":"Acoustic Enhancer Microbubble Cavitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Treatment for Urolithiasis.","authors":"Wesley A Mayer,Thomas Chi,Scott Wiener,Christopher H Cantrill,Julio G Davalos,Hemendra N Shah,Marshall L Stoller","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThe efficacy of ureteroscopy to treat urinary stones is often less than 60%. Acoustic Enhancer is an investigational device of microparticles with a tag designed with an affinity for calcium. We evaluated safety and efficacy of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy with and without Acoustic Enhancer Microbubble Cavitation in a randomized clinical trial.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nPatients with urolithiasis were randomized to ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy with or without Acoustic Enhancer. The endpoints were the proportion of patients without residual fragments > 2mm on computed tomography 30 days post-procedure (fragment-free rate) and adverse events.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThere were 103 and 93 patients in the investigational and control groups, respectively. There was no statistical superiority between the 2 groups. The fragment-free rate was 41.4% and 47% in the investigational and control groups, respectively (p=0.46). Residual fragment size was similar, 5.55mm versus 5.70mm for the investigational and control groups, respectively (p = 0.71). Among investigational patients treated with higher average powers > 12W, the fragment free rate was 51% compared to 32% (n=47) for the low-power group (p=0.06). Adverse events were noted in 35% and 46.2% of patients in the investigational and the control groups, respectively (p=0.11). The total number of adverse events was less for the investigational arm (p<0.001).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAlthough laser lithotripsy with microbubble cavitation did not increase efficacy, it was associated with significantly fewer adverse events. . Efficacy of microbubble cavitation may depend on laser power utilized. The low efficacy and high rates of adverse events with ureteroscopy highlights the need for novel management approaches for urinary stones.","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"36 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004581"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE The efficacy of ureteroscopy to treat urinary stones is often less than 60%. Acoustic Enhancer is an investigational device of microparticles with a tag designed with an affinity for calcium. We evaluated safety and efficacy of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy with and without Acoustic Enhancer Microbubble Cavitation in a randomized clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with urolithiasis were randomized to ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy with or without Acoustic Enhancer. The endpoints were the proportion of patients without residual fragments > 2mm on computed tomography 30 days post-procedure (fragment-free rate) and adverse events. RESULTS There were 103 and 93 patients in the investigational and control groups, respectively. There was no statistical superiority between the 2 groups. The fragment-free rate was 41.4% and 47% in the investigational and control groups, respectively (p=0.46). Residual fragment size was similar, 5.55mm versus 5.70mm for the investigational and control groups, respectively (p = 0.71). Among investigational patients treated with higher average powers > 12W, the fragment free rate was 51% compared to 32% (n=47) for the low-power group (p=0.06). Adverse events were noted in 35% and 46.2% of patients in the investigational and the control groups, respectively (p=0.11). The total number of adverse events was less for the investigational arm (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Although laser lithotripsy with microbubble cavitation did not increase efficacy, it was associated with significantly fewer adverse events. . Efficacy of microbubble cavitation may depend on laser power utilized. The low efficacy and high rates of adverse events with ureteroscopy highlights the need for novel management approaches for urinary stones.
声学增强器微泡空化:一项评估尿石症新治疗方法安全性和有效性的随机临床试验。
目的输尿管镜检查治疗尿路结石的有效率常低于60%。声学增强器是一种具有钙亲和力的微粒子标签的研究装置。在一项随机临床试验中,我们评估了输尿管镜激光碎石伴和不伴微泡空化的安全性和有效性。材料与方法将尿石症患者随机分为输尿管镜激光碎石组和不输尿管镜激光碎石组。终点是术后30天计算机断层扫描无残余碎片> mm的患者比例(碎片无率)和不良事件。结果研究组103例,对照组93例。两组间无统计学优势。实验组和对照组的无碎片率分别为41.4%和47% (p=0.46)。残余碎片大小相似,研究组和对照组分别为5.55mm和5.70mm (p = 0.71)。在接受更高平均功率bbb12w治疗的研究患者中,碎片无碎片率为51%,而低功率组为32% (n=47) (p=0.06)。研究组和对照组的不良事件发生率分别为35%和46.2% (p=0.11)。研究组的不良事件总数较少(p<0.001)。结论微泡空化激光碎石术虽不能提高疗效,但其不良事件发生率明显降低。微泡空化的效果可能取决于所使用的激光功率。输尿管镜检查的低疗效和高发生率的不良事件突出了需要新的管理方法来治疗尿路结石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信