Reversing and controlling microbial proliferation in the water system of a high-risk hospital ward after extended closure and reconstruction

IF 11.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Dominique L. Chaput , Kerr Clarkson , Linda Bagrade , Aleksandra Marek , Dennis Kelly , David Watson , Tom Steele , Alistair Leanord
{"title":"Reversing and controlling microbial proliferation in the water system of a high-risk hospital ward after extended closure and reconstruction","authors":"Dominique L. Chaput ,&nbsp;Kerr Clarkson ,&nbsp;Linda Bagrade ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Marek ,&nbsp;Dennis Kelly ,&nbsp;David Watson ,&nbsp;Tom Steele ,&nbsp;Alistair Leanord","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens occur naturally in water but can pose a health risk to hospital patients who are more vulnerable due to illness or treatment. Ward closure periods can lead to microbial proliferation within water systems, posing a challenge to hospital estates and infection control teams. Following the 3-year closure of our paediatric haemato-oncology ward, water testing showed high total viable counts (TVCs) in over 20 % of samples and elevated counts of numerous Gram negative bacterial species (GNBs) in 73 % of samples, despite daily flushing and continuous chlorine dioxide dosing. We aimed to determine the extent of microbial proliferation, measure the impact of three sequential interventions (system disinfections with chlorine, with silver stabilised hydrogen peroxide, and then tap replacement), and assess the long-term performance of this water system. By sampling systematically across spatial and temporal scales, and using a range of microbiological tests (TVCs, <em>Legionella</em> spp., <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp., Gram negative bacteria, atypical mycobacteria and fungi), we showed that microbial proliferation was confined to the closed ward. Chlorine treatment had no significant impact on TVCs, but both silver stabilised hydrogen peroxide and tap replacement resulted in significant decreases (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). Similarly, the three Gram negative species that were enriched following the reconstruction period (<em>Cupriavidus pauculus, Sphingomonas paucimobilis</em>, and <em>Acidovorax temperans</em>) were less impacted by chlorine than by the other interventions. Following these interventions, fewer than 1 % of samples exceeded our strict local TVC threshold of 10 CFU/ml and GNBs were detected in 7 % of samples. Since the ward reopened to patients in 2022, there has been no return of the high microbiological counts observed immediately after reconstruction. Gram negative bacteria have been detected only sporadically, and the taxa found in samples collected through 0.2 μm point-of-use filters shifted towards species associated with humans. Our systematic approach was successful in returning this hospital water system to a safe state, and once microbial proliferation within the system itself was rectified, further positive results were likely attributable to the interactions of users with the outlets. Distinguishing between possible sources of microbial counts in water is crucial to selecting the most suitable interventions and helping ensure provision of safe water to patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"282 ","pages":"Article 123748"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135425006578","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens occur naturally in water but can pose a health risk to hospital patients who are more vulnerable due to illness or treatment. Ward closure periods can lead to microbial proliferation within water systems, posing a challenge to hospital estates and infection control teams. Following the 3-year closure of our paediatric haemato-oncology ward, water testing showed high total viable counts (TVCs) in over 20 % of samples and elevated counts of numerous Gram negative bacterial species (GNBs) in 73 % of samples, despite daily flushing and continuous chlorine dioxide dosing. We aimed to determine the extent of microbial proliferation, measure the impact of three sequential interventions (system disinfections with chlorine, with silver stabilised hydrogen peroxide, and then tap replacement), and assess the long-term performance of this water system. By sampling systematically across spatial and temporal scales, and using a range of microbiological tests (TVCs, Legionella spp., Pseudomonas spp., Gram negative bacteria, atypical mycobacteria and fungi), we showed that microbial proliferation was confined to the closed ward. Chlorine treatment had no significant impact on TVCs, but both silver stabilised hydrogen peroxide and tap replacement resulted in significant decreases (p < 0.01). Similarly, the three Gram negative species that were enriched following the reconstruction period (Cupriavidus pauculus, Sphingomonas paucimobilis, and Acidovorax temperans) were less impacted by chlorine than by the other interventions. Following these interventions, fewer than 1 % of samples exceeded our strict local TVC threshold of 10 CFU/ml and GNBs were detected in 7 % of samples. Since the ward reopened to patients in 2022, there has been no return of the high microbiological counts observed immediately after reconstruction. Gram negative bacteria have been detected only sporadically, and the taxa found in samples collected through 0.2 μm point-of-use filters shifted towards species associated with humans. Our systematic approach was successful in returning this hospital water system to a safe state, and once microbial proliferation within the system itself was rectified, further positive results were likely attributable to the interactions of users with the outlets. Distinguishing between possible sources of microbial counts in water is crucial to selecting the most suitable interventions and helping ensure provision of safe water to patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

逆转和控制某高危医院病房长时间关闭重建后水系统微生物增殖
机会前提管道病原体自然存在于水中,但可能对医院患者构成健康风险,因为他们更容易受到疾病或治疗的影响。病房关闭期可能导致水系统内微生物的繁殖,对医院和感染控制小组构成挑战。在我们的儿科血液肿瘤病房关闭3年后,水检测显示,尽管每天冲洗并持续给药二氧化氯,但超过20%的样本中总活菌计数(tvc)较高,73%的样本中多种革兰氏阴性细菌(GNBs)计数升高。我们的目的是确定微生物增殖的程度,测量三种连续干预措施(用氯消毒系统,用银稳定的过氧化氢消毒,然后更换水龙头)的影响,并评估该水系统的长期性能。通过在空间和时间尺度上进行系统采样,并使用一系列微生物学测试(tcv、军团菌、假单胞菌、革兰氏阴性菌、非典型分枝杆菌和真菌),我们发现微生物增殖仅限于封闭病房。氯处理对tvc无显著影响,但银稳定过氧化氢和水龙头更换均显著降低tvc (p<0.01)。同样,重建期后富集的3种革兰氏阴性物种(铜绿单胞菌、少动鞘单胞菌和嗜酸单胞菌)受氯的影响小于其他干预。在这些干预措施之后,不到1%的样本超过了我们严格的当地TVC阈值10 CFU/ml, 7%的样本中检测到gnb。自该病房于2022年重新向患者开放以来,重建后立即观察到的高微生物计数并未恢复。革兰氏阴性菌仅偶尔被检测到,并且通过0.2 μm使用点过滤器收集的样品中发现的分类群转向与人类相关的物种。我们的系统方法成功地将医院供水系统恢复到安全状态,一旦系统内的微生物增殖得到纠正,进一步的积极结果可能归因于用户与出口的互动。区分水中微生物数量的可能来源对于选择最合适的干预措施和帮助确保向患者提供安全用水至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Research
Water Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1307
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include: •Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management; •Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure; •Drinking water treatment and distribution; •Potable and non-potable water reuse; •Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment; •Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions; •Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment; •Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution; •Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation; •Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts; •Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle; •Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信