{"title":"Using the process model of eco-anxiety in group work","authors":"Panu Pihkala","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Group work is regarded as an especially promising method for engaging with eco-anxiety and other difficult eco-emotions. This article introduces a new method for facilitated group work based on the process model of eco-anxiety and ecological grief (hereafter, the process model). The method combines elements from timeline exercises, social learning, spectrum line methods, and somatic methods. Observations and feedback from a pilot workshop are used to develop the method further. Participants explored their eco-anxiety journeys in small groups. The phases and dimensions of the process model were printed on paper, and people could move in space while they reflected on them. The participants were encouraged to experiment with somatic movements and sounds. The possible balance or imbalance between action, distancing (including self-care), and grieving (including other emotional engagement) was explored. The workshop ended with creative co-thinking about how to find more balance. This method was clearly useful for the participants, but more research is needed to explore its use with different audiences. This method can be facilitated by people other than therapists if they have suitable skills, but it also allows for in-depth use in therapy and psychological interventions. Variations of using the method or parts of it are discussed.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Group work is regarded as an especially promising method for engaging with eco-anxiety and other difficult eco-emotions. This article introduces a new method for facilitated group work based on the process model of eco-anxiety and ecological grief (hereafter, the process model). The method combines elements from timeline exercises, social learning, spectrum line methods, and somatic methods. Observations and feedback from a pilot workshop are used to develop the method further. Participants explored their eco-anxiety journeys in small groups. The phases and dimensions of the process model were printed on paper, and people could move in space while they reflected on them. The participants were encouraged to experiment with somatic movements and sounds. The possible balance or imbalance between action, distancing (including self-care), and grieving (including other emotional engagement) was explored. The workshop ended with creative co-thinking about how to find more balance. This method was clearly useful for the participants, but more research is needed to explore its use with different audiences. This method can be facilitated by people other than therapists if they have suitable skills, but it also allows for in-depth use in therapy and psychological interventions. Variations of using the method or parts of it are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.