Andrew M. L. Jewlal, Yongwook Kim, Giuseppe V. Crescenzo, Curtis P. Berlinguette
{"title":"Go with CO: A Case for Targeting Carbon Monoxide As a Reactive Carbon Capture Product","authors":"Andrew M. L. Jewlal, Yongwook Kim, Giuseppe V. Crescenzo, Curtis P. Berlinguette","doi":"10.1021/acsenergylett.4c03584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is relevant to reactive carbon capture using aqueous alkaline capture solutions, where captured CO<sub>2</sub> is electrochemically released from a capture solution and then upgraded into commodity chemicals in an electrolyzer. The commercial viability of this form of reactive carbon capture demands that the electrolyzer effluent that is returned to the capture unit be sufficiently alkaline to effectively capture CO<sub>2</sub> from air or a point source. Here, we introduce “electron-alkalinity efficiency” (EA%) to correlate OH<sup>–</sup> production to electrons consumed during the electrolysis of CO<sub>2</sub>. We show that the maximum EA% value for CO production is 100%, but is less than 50% for the production of HCOO<sup>–</sup>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>. This outcome implies that the electrolytic production of CO yields the highest CO<sub>2</sub> capture efficiency. To support this claim, we modeled a 1-m<sup>2</sup> electrolyzer producing CO at a current density of 200 mA cm<sup>–2</sup>, 100% Faradaic efficiency for CO, and 100% CO<sub>2</sub> utilization, resulting in an OH<sup>–</sup> production rate of 75 mol h<sup>–1</sup>. No other CO<sub>2</sub> reduction products (HCOO<sup>–</sup>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>) generate this level of alkalinity without operating at far more extreme current densities or larger scales. We therefore recommend to “go with CO” for reactive carbon capture.","PeriodicalId":16,"journal":{"name":"ACS Energy Letters ","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Energy Letters ","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.4c03584","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study is relevant to reactive carbon capture using aqueous alkaline capture solutions, where captured CO2 is electrochemically released from a capture solution and then upgraded into commodity chemicals in an electrolyzer. The commercial viability of this form of reactive carbon capture demands that the electrolyzer effluent that is returned to the capture unit be sufficiently alkaline to effectively capture CO2 from air or a point source. Here, we introduce “electron-alkalinity efficiency” (EA%) to correlate OH– production to electrons consumed during the electrolysis of CO2. We show that the maximum EA% value for CO production is 100%, but is less than 50% for the production of HCOO–, CH4, and C2H4. This outcome implies that the electrolytic production of CO yields the highest CO2 capture efficiency. To support this claim, we modeled a 1-m2 electrolyzer producing CO at a current density of 200 mA cm–2, 100% Faradaic efficiency for CO, and 100% CO2 utilization, resulting in an OH– production rate of 75 mol h–1. No other CO2 reduction products (HCOO–, CH4, and C2H4) generate this level of alkalinity without operating at far more extreme current densities or larger scales. We therefore recommend to “go with CO” for reactive carbon capture.
ACS Energy Letters Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
469
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍:
ACS Energy Letters is a monthly journal that publishes papers reporting new scientific advances in energy research. The journal focuses on topics that are of interest to scientists working in the fundamental and applied sciences. Rapid publication is a central criterion for acceptance, and the journal is known for its quick publication times, with an average of 4-6 weeks from submission to web publication in As Soon As Publishable format.
ACS Energy Letters is ranked as the number one journal in the Web of Science Electrochemistry category. It also ranks within the top 10 journals for Physical Chemistry, Energy & Fuels, and Nanoscience & Nanotechnology.
The journal offers several types of articles, including Letters, Energy Express, Perspectives, Reviews, Editorials, Viewpoints and Energy Focus. Additionally, authors have the option to submit videos that summarize or support the information presented in a Perspective or Review article, which can be highlighted on the journal's website. ACS Energy Letters is abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts Service/SciFinder, EBSCO-summon, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Portico.