SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomized trials

IF 58.7 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
An-Wen Chan, Isabelle Boutron, Sally Hopewell, David Moher, Kenneth F. Schulz, Gary S. Collins, Ruth Tunn, Rakesh Aggarwal, Michael Berkwits, Jesse A. Berlin, Nita Bhandari, Nancy J. Butcher, Marion K. Campbell, Runcie C. W. Chidebe, Diana R. Elbourne, Andrew J. Farmer, Dean A. Fergusson, Robert M. Golub, Steven N. Goodman, Tammy C. Hoffmann, John P. A. Ioannidis, Brennan C. Kahan, Rachel L. Knowles, Sarah E. Lamb, Steff Lewis, Elizabeth Loder, Martin Offringa, Philippe Ravaud, Dawn P. Richards, Frank W. Rockhold, David L. Schriger, Nandi L. Siegfried, Sophie Staniszewska, Rod S. Taylor, Lehana Thabane, David J. Torgerson, Sunita Vohra, Ian R. White, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
{"title":"SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomized trials","authors":"An-Wen Chan, Isabelle Boutron, Sally Hopewell, David Moher, Kenneth F. Schulz, Gary S. Collins, Ruth Tunn, Rakesh Aggarwal, Michael Berkwits, Jesse A. Berlin, Nita Bhandari, Nancy J. Butcher, Marion K. Campbell, Runcie C. W. Chidebe, Diana R. Elbourne, Andrew J. Farmer, Dean A. Fergusson, Robert M. Golub, Steven N. Goodman, Tammy C. Hoffmann, John P. A. Ioannidis, Brennan C. Kahan, Rachel L. Knowles, Sarah E. Lamb, Steff Lewis, Elizabeth Loder, Martin Offringa, Philippe Ravaud, Dawn P. Richards, Frank W. Rockhold, David L. Schriger, Nandi L. Siegfried, Sophie Staniszewska, Rod S. Taylor, Lehana Thabane, David J. Torgerson, Sunita Vohra, Ian R. White, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03668-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The protocol of a randomized trial is the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting and external review. However, trial protocols vary in their completeness and often do not address key elements of design and conduct. The SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement was first published in 2013 as guidance to improve the completeness of trial protocols. Periodic updates incorporating the latest evidence and best practices are needed to ensure that the guidance remains relevant to users. Here, we aimed to systematically update the SPIRIT recommendations for minimum items to address in the protocol of a randomized trial. We completed a scoping review and developed a project-specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence to generate a list of potential changes to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by lead authors of existing SPIRIT/CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extensions (Harms, Outcomes, Non-pharmacological Treatment) and other reporting guidelines (TIDieR). The potential modifications were rated in a three-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting. Overall, 317 individuals participated in the Delphi consensus process and 30 experts attended the consensus meeting. The process led to the addition of two new protocol items, revision to five items, deletion/merger of five items, and integration of key items from other relevant reporting guidelines. Notable changes include a new open science section, additional emphasis on the assessment of harms and description of interventions and comparators, and a new item on how patients and the public will be involved in trial design, conduct and reporting. The updated SPIRIT 2025 statement consists of an evidence-based checklist of 34 minimum items to address in a trial protocol, along with a diagram illustrating the schedule of enrollment, interventions and assessments for trial participants. To facilitate implementation, we also developed an expanded version of the SPIRIT 2025 checklist and an accompanying explanation and elaboration document. Widespread endorsement and adherence to the updated SPIRIT 2025 statement have the potential to enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators and other reviewers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"138 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03668-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The protocol of a randomized trial is the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting and external review. However, trial protocols vary in their completeness and often do not address key elements of design and conduct. The SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement was first published in 2013 as guidance to improve the completeness of trial protocols. Periodic updates incorporating the latest evidence and best practices are needed to ensure that the guidance remains relevant to users. Here, we aimed to systematically update the SPIRIT recommendations for minimum items to address in the protocol of a randomized trial. We completed a scoping review and developed a project-specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence to generate a list of potential changes to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by lead authors of existing SPIRIT/CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extensions (Harms, Outcomes, Non-pharmacological Treatment) and other reporting guidelines (TIDieR). The potential modifications were rated in a three-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting. Overall, 317 individuals participated in the Delphi consensus process and 30 experts attended the consensus meeting. The process led to the addition of two new protocol items, revision to five items, deletion/merger of five items, and integration of key items from other relevant reporting guidelines. Notable changes include a new open science section, additional emphasis on the assessment of harms and description of interventions and comparators, and a new item on how patients and the public will be involved in trial design, conduct and reporting. The updated SPIRIT 2025 statement consists of an evidence-based checklist of 34 minimum items to address in a trial protocol, along with a diagram illustrating the schedule of enrollment, interventions and assessments for trial participants. To facilitate implementation, we also developed an expanded version of the SPIRIT 2025 checklist and an accompanying explanation and elaboration document. Widespread endorsement and adherence to the updated SPIRIT 2025 statement have the potential to enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators and other reviewers.

SPIRIT 2025声明:更新的随机试验方案指南
随机试验方案是研究计划、实施、报告和外部评价的基础。然而,试验方案的完整性各不相同,而且往往不涉及设计和实施的关键要素。SPIRIT(标准方案项目:干预性试验建议)声明于2013年首次发布,作为提高试验方案完整性的指南。需要定期更新,纳入最新证据和最佳做法,以确保指南与用户保持相关性。在这里,我们的目的是系统地更新SPIRIT建议的最低项目,以解决随机试验方案。我们完成了一项范围审查,并开发了一个具体项目的经验和理论证据数据库,以生成SPIRIT 2013清单的潜在变化列表。现有的SPIRIT/CONSORT(试验报告综合标准)扩展(危害、结果、非药物治疗)和其他报告指南(TIDieR)的主要作者提供的建议丰富了该清单。潜在的修改是在三轮德尔菲调查之后的共识会议进行评级。总共有317人参与了德尔菲共识过程,30位专家参加了共识会议。这一进程导致增加了两个新的议定书项目,修订了五个项目,删除/合并了五个项目,并整合了其他相关报告准则中的关键项目。值得注意的变化包括新的开放科学部分,额外强调危害评估和干预措施和比较物的描述,以及关于患者和公众如何参与试验设计、实施和报告的新项目。更新后的SPIRIT 2025声明包括一份基于证据的清单,其中包含试验方案中需要解决的34个最低项目,以及说明试验参与者的入组、干预措施和评估时间表的图表。为方便实施,我们亦制定了“精神2025”清单的扩展版本,以及随附的解释和阐述文件。更新后的SPIRIT 2025声明得到广泛认可和遵守,有可能提高试验方案的透明度和完整性,从而造福研究人员、试验参与者、患者、资助者、研究伦理委员会、期刊、试验注册中心、政策制定者、监管机构和其他审稿人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信