Exposure and health risks of livestock air resistomes

IF 9.4 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Wei Sun, Jun Wang, Guangdong Wang, Lan Jiang, Wenlu Feng, Shuangsuo Dang, Mei Li, Shuo Jiao, Gehong Wei, Jie Gu, James M. Tiedje, Xun Qian
{"title":"Exposure and health risks of livestock air resistomes","authors":"Wei Sun, Jun Wang, Guangdong Wang, Lan Jiang, Wenlu Feng, Shuangsuo Dang, Mei Li, Shuo Jiao, Gehong Wei, Jie Gu, James M. Tiedje, Xun Qian","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2403866122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of the global antibiotic consumption is by the livestock industry, making livestock farms a hotspot of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Farm air poses direct ARG exposure to workers, but the health risks of air resistomes remain unclear. We evaluated the human exposure and health risks of air resistomes in pig and chicken farms and compared air resistomes in Chinese farms to those in European farms given their long-term restrictions on use of antibiotics in livestock. We found that livestock air was highly enriched in ARGs, with each cell harboring seven times more ARGs than urban air. The daily ARG inhalation of farm workers was equivalent to several years of ARG inhalation by urban residents. ARGs encoding resistance to last-resort antibiotics such as <jats:italic>mcr-1</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>tetX</jats:italic> were detected in farm air, and <jats:italic>tetX</jats:italic> variants were prevalent in both Chinese and European farms. ARGs in livestock air were highly associated with mobile genetic elements, and conjugation experiments confirmed their cross-phyla transferability. The projected resistome risk of farm air was significantly higher than well-recognized ARG hotspots like air from hospitals, sewage treatment plants, and from animal manures. The diversity, abundance, and risk score of air resistomes in Chinese farms were significantly higher than those in European farms, suggesting that long-term restriction of antibiotic use mitigates antibiotic resistance in the livestock environment. Our results underscore the high exposure of farm workers to ARGs via farm air and highlight its role in ARG dissemination, supporting the importance of antibiotic stewardship practices in combating antibiotic resistance.","PeriodicalId":20548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2403866122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most of the global antibiotic consumption is by the livestock industry, making livestock farms a hotspot of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Farm air poses direct ARG exposure to workers, but the health risks of air resistomes remain unclear. We evaluated the human exposure and health risks of air resistomes in pig and chicken farms and compared air resistomes in Chinese farms to those in European farms given their long-term restrictions on use of antibiotics in livestock. We found that livestock air was highly enriched in ARGs, with each cell harboring seven times more ARGs than urban air. The daily ARG inhalation of farm workers was equivalent to several years of ARG inhalation by urban residents. ARGs encoding resistance to last-resort antibiotics such as mcr-1 and tetX were detected in farm air, and tetX variants were prevalent in both Chinese and European farms. ARGs in livestock air were highly associated with mobile genetic elements, and conjugation experiments confirmed their cross-phyla transferability. The projected resistome risk of farm air was significantly higher than well-recognized ARG hotspots like air from hospitals, sewage treatment plants, and from animal manures. The diversity, abundance, and risk score of air resistomes in Chinese farms were significantly higher than those in European farms, suggesting that long-term restriction of antibiotic use mitigates antibiotic resistance in the livestock environment. Our results underscore the high exposure of farm workers to ARGs via farm air and highlight its role in ARG dissemination, supporting the importance of antibiotic stewardship practices in combating antibiotic resistance.
牲畜空气抗性物质的暴露和健康风险
全球大部分抗生素消费来自畜牧业,这使得畜牧业成为抗生素耐药基因(ARGs)的热点。农场空气对工人造成直接的ARG暴露,但空气抵抗力的健康风险尚不清楚。我们评估了养猪场和养鸡场空气抗性菌的人类暴露和健康风险,并将中国农场的空气抗性菌与欧洲农场的空气抗性菌进行了比较,因为欧洲农场长期限制在牲畜中使用抗生素。我们发现家畜空气中ARGs含量很高,每个细胞的ARGs含量是城市空气的7倍。农场工人每日吸入的ARG相当于城市居民数年的ARG吸入量。在农场空气中检测到编码对最后手段抗生素(如mcr-1和tetX)耐药的ARGs,并且tetX变体在中国和欧洲农场中普遍存在。家畜空气中的ARGs与可移动遗传元件高度相关,偶联实验证实了它们的跨门可转移性。预计农场空气的抗性风险明显高于公认的ARG热点,如医院、污水处理厂和动物粪便的空气。中国农场空气抗性组的多样性、丰度和风险评分显著高于欧洲农场,表明长期限制抗生素使用减轻了牲畜环境中的抗生素耐药性。我们的研究结果强调了农场工人通过农场空气高度暴露于ARG,并强调了其在ARG传播中的作用,支持抗生素管理实践在对抗抗生素耐药性方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
3575
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer-reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), serves as an authoritative source for high-impact, original research across the biological, physical, and social sciences. With a global scope, the journal welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide, making it an inclusive platform for advancing scientific knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信