Application of GA/PSO Metaheuristic Algorithms Coupled with Deep Neural Networks for Predicting the Fracability Index of Shale Gas Formations

IF 4.8 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mbula Ngoy Nadege, Biao Shu, Meshac B. Ngungu, Mutangala Emmanuel Arthur, Kouassi Verena Dominique
{"title":"Application of GA/PSO Metaheuristic Algorithms Coupled with Deep Neural Networks for Predicting the Fracability Index of Shale Gas Formations","authors":"Mbula Ngoy Nadege, Biao Shu, Meshac B. Ngungu, Mutangala Emmanuel Arthur, Kouassi Verena Dominique","doi":"10.1007/s11053-025-10495-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Shale gas reserves represent a significant source of natural gas, but unlocking their full potential depends on effective hydraulic fracturing. This research investigates the application of machine learning (ML) techniques to predict fracability index (FI), offering a faster and more cost-effective alternative to traditional experimental methods. Focusing on the Upper Ordovician Wufeng to Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Weiyuan shale gas field, Sichuan Basin, China, this study employed deep neural networks that integrate two metaheuristic algorithms—genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO)—with the back-propagation technique. These combined algorithms—termed GABPNN and PSOBPNN—were utilized to predict the FI. Model performance was assessed using three metrics: R<sup>2</sup>, RMSE, and MAE. The GABPNN achieved R<sup>2</sup>, RMSE, and MAE of 0.97531, 0.024754, and 0.0042875, respectively, while the PSOBPNN yielded values of 0.97494, 0.024938, and 0.0048962, respectively. Notably, when predicting FI values for the test well, the PSOBPNN model attained a R<sup>2</sup> of 0.99848, and the GABPNN model achieved a R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9993, indicating exceptional predictive accuracy. Both models demonstrated nearly perfect prediction accuracy for FI in the testing dataset, underscored by their high R<sup>2</sup> values. Importantly, the GABPNN model exhibited superior capability in mitigating overfitting, a common challenge in ML applications. Overall, the GABPNN and PSOBPNN models offer effective alternatives for assessing the fracability of shale gas reservoirs. By facilitating the identification of sweet spots for fracturing, these ML-based approaches have the potential to optimize operations in shale gas reservoirs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54284,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Research","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-025-10495-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shale gas reserves represent a significant source of natural gas, but unlocking their full potential depends on effective hydraulic fracturing. This research investigates the application of machine learning (ML) techniques to predict fracability index (FI), offering a faster and more cost-effective alternative to traditional experimental methods. Focusing on the Upper Ordovician Wufeng to Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Weiyuan shale gas field, Sichuan Basin, China, this study employed deep neural networks that integrate two metaheuristic algorithms—genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO)—with the back-propagation technique. These combined algorithms—termed GABPNN and PSOBPNN—were utilized to predict the FI. Model performance was assessed using three metrics: R2, RMSE, and MAE. The GABPNN achieved R2, RMSE, and MAE of 0.97531, 0.024754, and 0.0042875, respectively, while the PSOBPNN yielded values of 0.97494, 0.024938, and 0.0048962, respectively. Notably, when predicting FI values for the test well, the PSOBPNN model attained a R2 of 0.99848, and the GABPNN model achieved a R2 of 0.9993, indicating exceptional predictive accuracy. Both models demonstrated nearly perfect prediction accuracy for FI in the testing dataset, underscored by their high R2 values. Importantly, the GABPNN model exhibited superior capability in mitigating overfitting, a common challenge in ML applications. Overall, the GABPNN and PSOBPNN models offer effective alternatives for assessing the fracability of shale gas reservoirs. By facilitating the identification of sweet spots for fracturing, these ML-based approaches have the potential to optimize operations in shale gas reservoirs.

GA/PSO元启发式算法结合深度神经网络在页岩气可压性指标预测中的应用
页岩气储量是天然气的重要来源,但能否充分释放其潜力取决于有效的水力压裂技术。本研究探讨了机器学习(ML)技术在预测可破碎性指数(FI)中的应用,为传统实验方法提供了一种更快、更经济的替代方案。以四川盆地威远页岩气田上奥陶统五峰组至下志留统龙马溪组为研究对象,采用融合遗传算法(GA)和粒子群算法(PSO)两种元启发式算法和反向传播技术的深度神经网络。这些组合算法-称为GABPNN和psobpnn -被用来预测FI。使用三个指标评估模型性能:R2、RMSE和MAE。GABPNN的R2、RMSE和MAE分别为0.97531、0.024754和0.0042875,PSOBPNN的R2、RMSE和MAE分别为0.97494、0.024938和0.0048962。值得注意的是,在预测测试井的FI值时,PSOBPNN模型的R2为0.99848,GABPNN模型的R2为0.9993,表明了出色的预测精度。这两种模型在测试数据集中都显示出近乎完美的FI预测精度,其高R2值突出了这一点。重要的是,GABPNN模型在缓解过拟合方面表现出了卓越的能力,这是ML应用中常见的挑战。总的来说,GABPNN和PSOBPNN模型为评估页岩气储层的可压性提供了有效的替代方法。通过方便地识别压裂的最佳位置,这些基于ml的方法有可能优化页岩气藏的作业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Resources Research
Natural Resources Research Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: This journal publishes quantitative studies of natural (mainly but not limited to mineral) resources exploration, evaluation and exploitation, including environmental and risk-related aspects. Typical articles use geoscientific data or analyses to assess, test, or compare resource-related aspects. NRR covers a wide variety of resources including minerals, coal, hydrocarbon, geothermal, water, and vegetation. Case studies are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信