[18F]FDG PET imaging in the differentiation of cardiac masses: an updated systematic review and dual Meta-Analysis of diagnostic performance and parameter variability

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Alessio Rizzo, Vincenzo Viccaro, Anna Giulia Pavon, Laura Anna Leo, Giorgio Treglia
{"title":"[18F]FDG PET imaging in the differentiation of cardiac masses: an updated systematic review and dual Meta-Analysis of diagnostic performance and parameter variability","authors":"Alessio Rizzo, Vincenzo Viccaro, Anna Giulia Pavon, Laura Anna Leo, Giorgio Treglia","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07289-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Cardiac masses (CMs) encompass a heterogeneous group of benign, malignant, and pseudotumoural lesions, posing diagnostic challenges due to their rarity and varied aetiologies. Given the limitations of conventional imaging modalities in differentiating benign from malignant masses, [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT has emerged as a promising technique by providing metabolic information. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in characterising CMs and assess semi-quantitative parameters’ role in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in CMs. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a random-effects model, and a secondary analysis examined differences in SUVmax between malignant and benign lesions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Fifteen studies enrolling 1114 patients met inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in detecting malignant CMs were 89.2% (95% CI: 85–92%) and 82.8% (95% CI: 78–87%), respectively. Malignant lesions exhibited significantly higher SUVmax values (range: 5.6–14.3) than benign masses (range: 1.1–5.3, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). PET/CT proved particularly effective in cases with inconclusive findings from echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, or CT, contributing to biopsy guidance and treatment planning.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT demonstrates robust diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant cardiac masses, with SUVmax as a valuable malignancy marker. Its integration into multimodal imaging strategies enhances diagnostic certainty and optimises patient management. Despite these advantages, standardised imaging protocols and further multicentre prospective studies are warranted to refine its clinical application and validate its prognostic potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07289-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Cardiac masses (CMs) encompass a heterogeneous group of benign, malignant, and pseudotumoural lesions, posing diagnostic challenges due to their rarity and varied aetiologies. Given the limitations of conventional imaging modalities in differentiating benign from malignant masses, [18F]FDG PET/CT has emerged as a promising technique by providing metabolic information. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT in characterising CMs and assess semi-quantitative parameters’ role in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/CT in CMs. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a random-effects model, and a secondary analysis examined differences in SUVmax between malignant and benign lesions.

Results

Fifteen studies enrolling 1114 patients met inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of [18F]FDG PET/CT in detecting malignant CMs were 89.2% (95% CI: 85–92%) and 82.8% (95% CI: 78–87%), respectively. Malignant lesions exhibited significantly higher SUVmax values (range: 5.6–14.3) than benign masses (range: 1.1–5.3, p < 0.001). PET/CT proved particularly effective in cases with inconclusive findings from echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, or CT, contributing to biopsy guidance and treatment planning.

Conclusions

[18F]FDG PET/CT demonstrates robust diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant cardiac masses, with SUVmax as a valuable malignancy marker. Its integration into multimodal imaging strategies enhances diagnostic certainty and optimises patient management. Despite these advantages, standardised imaging protocols and further multicentre prospective studies are warranted to refine its clinical application and validate its prognostic potential.

[18F]FDG PET成像在心脏肿块鉴别中的应用:一项最新的系统综述和诊断性能和参数变异性的双重meta分析
心脏肿块(CMs)包括不同种类的良性、恶性和假肿瘤病变,由于其罕见和病因多样,给诊断带来了挑战。考虑到常规成像方式在区分良性和恶性肿块方面的局限性,[18F]FDG PET/CT通过提供代谢信息已成为一种很有前途的技术。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估[18F]FDG PET/CT对CMs的诊断性能,并评估半定量参数在区分良性和恶性病变中的作用。方法进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,包括评估[18F]FDG PET/CT对CMs诊断准确性的研究。使用随机效应模型对敏感性和特异性进行汇总,并进行二次分析,检查恶性和良性病变之间SUVmax的差异。结果15项研究纳入1114例患者符合纳入标准。[18F]FDG PET/CT检测恶性CMs的总敏感性和特异性分别为89.2% (95% CI: 85 ~ 92%)和82.8% (95% CI: 78 ~ 87%)。恶性肿块的SUVmax值(范围:5.6-14.3)明显高于良性肿块(范围:1.1-5.3,p < 0.001)。PET/CT被证明对超声心动图、心脏磁共振或CT结果不确定的病例特别有效,有助于活检指导和治疗计划。结论[18F]FDG PET/CT在区分心脏良恶性肿块方面具有很强的诊断准确性,SUVmax是一个有价值的恶性标记物。它与多模式成像策略的整合提高了诊断的确定性并优化了患者管理。尽管有这些优势,标准化的成像方案和进一步的多中心前瞻性研究是必要的,以完善其临床应用和验证其预后潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信