Intercropping of oat or mustard with legumes under organic management in the semiarid Canadian Prairie

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Myriam R. Fernandez, Prabhath Lokuruge, Lobna Abdellatif, Noe Waelchli, Julia Y. Leeson, Michael P. Schellenberg, Scott Chalmers
{"title":"Intercropping of oat or mustard with legumes under organic management in the semiarid Canadian Prairie","authors":"Myriam R. Fernandez,&nbsp;Prabhath Lokuruge,&nbsp;Lobna Abdellatif,&nbsp;Noe Waelchli,&nbsp;Julia Y. Leeson,&nbsp;Michael P. Schellenberg,&nbsp;Scott Chalmers","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intercropping, the growing of more than one crop at the same time within the same land area, could be a sustainable method of crop production in semiarid regions, which could increase biodiversity, and productivity and quality of crops compared to monocultures. This may be of significance under limited N, such as in organic agriculture, and could be an alternative to green manure. An organic study was conducted in the semiarid Canadian Prairie in drier than average years (2017–2018) to determine if intercropping legumes with non-legumes could reduce weeds and increase grain yield and quality of crops at different seeding rate ratios. Intercrops examined were lentil (<i>Lens culinaris</i> Medik.)–yellow mustard (<i>Sinapis alba</i> L.), and field pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i> L.)–oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.), at three seeding rate ratios, and their respective monocultures. Weed density was lower in the pea–oat intercrop than the pea monoculture, while weed biomass was lower in the lentil–mustard intercrop than the lentil monoculture. Legumes, when intercropped even at monoculture ratios, had lower aboveground biomass and grain yield than their monocultures, with pea showing higher tolerance than lentil to competition with its companion. Total biomass and grain yield were accounted for mostly by the non-legumes, which performed better than expected based on their seeding ratios. Mustard grown with lentil appeared to be more competitive than oat grown with pea. Grain weight of oat was higher in all intercrops with pea than in its monoculture, while grain protein of pea was higher when intercropped with oat than in its monoculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intercropping, the growing of more than one crop at the same time within the same land area, could be a sustainable method of crop production in semiarid regions, which could increase biodiversity, and productivity and quality of crops compared to monocultures. This may be of significance under limited N, such as in organic agriculture, and could be an alternative to green manure. An organic study was conducted in the semiarid Canadian Prairie in drier than average years (2017–2018) to determine if intercropping legumes with non-legumes could reduce weeds and increase grain yield and quality of crops at different seeding rate ratios. Intercrops examined were lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)–yellow mustard (Sinapis alba L.), and field pea (Pisum sativum L.)–oat (Avena sativa L.), at three seeding rate ratios, and their respective monocultures. Weed density was lower in the pea–oat intercrop than the pea monoculture, while weed biomass was lower in the lentil–mustard intercrop than the lentil monoculture. Legumes, when intercropped even at monoculture ratios, had lower aboveground biomass and grain yield than their monocultures, with pea showing higher tolerance than lentil to competition with its companion. Total biomass and grain yield were accounted for mostly by the non-legumes, which performed better than expected based on their seeding ratios. Mustard grown with lentil appeared to be more competitive than oat grown with pea. Grain weight of oat was higher in all intercrops with pea than in its monoculture, while grain protein of pea was higher when intercropped with oat than in its monoculture.

半干旱加拿大草原上有机管理下的燕麦或芥菜与豆科作物间作
间作,即在同一土地面积内同时种植多种作物,可能是半干旱地区作物生产的一种可持续方法,与单一栽培相比,它可以增加生物多样性,提高作物的生产力和质量。这在氮肥有限的情况下可能具有重要意义,例如在有机农业中,可能是绿肥的替代品。在较干旱年份(2017-2018年)的半干旱加拿大草原上进行了一项有机研究,以确定豆科作物与非豆科作物间作在不同播率下是否能减少杂草,提高作物的产量和品质。间作试验为小扁豆(Lens culinaris Medik.) -黄芥菜(Sinapis alba L.)和豌豆(Pisum sativum L.) -燕麦(Avena sativa L.),采用三种播种率比和各自的单种栽培。豌豆-燕麦间作的杂草密度低于豌豆单作,小扁豆-芥菜间作的杂草生物量低于小扁豆单作。间作豆科植物,即使在单作比例下,其地上生物量和籽粒产量也低于单作,豌豆比扁豆对其同伴的竞争表现出更高的耐受性。非豆科植物占总生物量和籽粒产量的大部分,其表现好于播种比的预期。与小扁豆一起生长的芥菜似乎比与豌豆一起生长的燕麦更具竞争力。所有套作豌豆的燕麦粒重均高于单作,豌豆籽粒蛋白均高于单作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信