Leo Peskett, Sarah Collins, Andrew Black, Matthew Arran, Alan MacDonald, Andy Young
{"title":"Using Storage Ponds in Natural Flood Management Schemes in Practice: The Need for Fine-Tuning and Upscaling","authors":"Leo Peskett, Sarah Collins, Andrew Black, Matthew Arran, Alan MacDonald, Andy Young","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is increasing interest in installing water storage ponds as part of natural flood management (NFM) approaches being implemented globally. Despite decades of experience with constructing flood storage ponds within civil engineering disciplines, there remains little empirical evidence of their effectiveness in NFM. In NFM, ‘natural’ ponds use green infrastructure, are often smaller but more numerous, and are built and maintained by land managers rather than engineers. Here we investigate six flood storage ponds in the 69 km<sup>2</sup> Eddleston NFM pilot catchment in Scotland, UK, analysing impact on peak stream flows at different scales and pond designs. The ponds generally reduce peak stream flows where they have large available capacity, catchments are small (< 1 km<sup>2</sup>), and events are low magnitude (> 20% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP)). No discernible flow reduction was observed at the largest pond and catchment (64 km<sup>2</sup>) for the largest (~21% AEP) event. There was significant variability between ponds, and gains can be made in engineering pond inlet/outlet structures, maintenance, and more widespread installation. The findings suggest that natural storage ponds have most potential to contribute to flood control in small catchments (< 10 km<sup>2</sup>) and small flood events (> 25% AEP), when they are carefully designed and maintained, and sufficient in number.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is increasing interest in installing water storage ponds as part of natural flood management (NFM) approaches being implemented globally. Despite decades of experience with constructing flood storage ponds within civil engineering disciplines, there remains little empirical evidence of their effectiveness in NFM. In NFM, ‘natural’ ponds use green infrastructure, are often smaller but more numerous, and are built and maintained by land managers rather than engineers. Here we investigate six flood storage ponds in the 69 km2 Eddleston NFM pilot catchment in Scotland, UK, analysing impact on peak stream flows at different scales and pond designs. The ponds generally reduce peak stream flows where they have large available capacity, catchments are small (< 1 km2), and events are low magnitude (> 20% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP)). No discernible flow reduction was observed at the largest pond and catchment (64 km2) for the largest (~21% AEP) event. There was significant variability between ponds, and gains can be made in engineering pond inlet/outlet structures, maintenance, and more widespread installation. The findings suggest that natural storage ponds have most potential to contribute to flood control in small catchments (< 10 km2) and small flood events (> 25% AEP), when they are carefully designed and maintained, and sufficient in number.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind.
Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.