{"title":"The Influence of Model Space Subdivision on Three-Dimensional Magnetic Anomaly Inversion","authors":"Bairu Zhao, Houpu Li, Henglei Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00024-025-03683-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Three-dimensional (3D) magnetic inversion plays a critical role in magnetic exploration by providing information about the spatial location, geometric shape, and distribution of physical parameters of anomalous bodies. The size of the model space subdivision determines the inversion resolution, while there is currently no consensus regarding the selection of subdivision accuracy for model space, which hampers its practical application. By discussing the relationship between subdivision accuracy and the effectiveness of 3D inversion, this study aims to provide a basis for the selection of the size of the model space subdivision. Multiple sets of theoretical magnetic models are used for 3D inversion with different size of the model space subdivisions, and the correlation coefficient between the inverted magnetization model and the theoretical magnetization model is used to evaluate the inversion accuracy. The results showed that the inversion accuracy continuously increases as the model subdivision spacing decreases to 0.5 times of the observed data spacing, and further improvement in the subdivision accuracy affect slightly the inversion accuracy. Therefore, it is suggested that the model subdivision spacing for inversion could be half of the observed data spacing. The applications of the model tests and field magnetic data from a mining area demonstrated that the inverted magnetization obtained using the size of the model space subdivision of 0.5 times the observed data spacing are significantly better than those obtained using the general 1 time the observed data spacing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"182 4","pages":"1513 - 1524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-025-03683-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) magnetic inversion plays a critical role in magnetic exploration by providing information about the spatial location, geometric shape, and distribution of physical parameters of anomalous bodies. The size of the model space subdivision determines the inversion resolution, while there is currently no consensus regarding the selection of subdivision accuracy for model space, which hampers its practical application. By discussing the relationship between subdivision accuracy and the effectiveness of 3D inversion, this study aims to provide a basis for the selection of the size of the model space subdivision. Multiple sets of theoretical magnetic models are used for 3D inversion with different size of the model space subdivisions, and the correlation coefficient between the inverted magnetization model and the theoretical magnetization model is used to evaluate the inversion accuracy. The results showed that the inversion accuracy continuously increases as the model subdivision spacing decreases to 0.5 times of the observed data spacing, and further improvement in the subdivision accuracy affect slightly the inversion accuracy. Therefore, it is suggested that the model subdivision spacing for inversion could be half of the observed data spacing. The applications of the model tests and field magnetic data from a mining area demonstrated that the inverted magnetization obtained using the size of the model space subdivision of 0.5 times the observed data spacing are significantly better than those obtained using the general 1 time the observed data spacing.
期刊介绍:
pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys.
Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata
Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences
Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research
Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences
See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.