An assessment of VOC emissions and human strength perception of liquid electric fragrance diffusers†

IF 3.5 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Thomas Warburton, Alastair C. Lewis, James R. Hopkins, Stephen J. Andrews, Amber M. Yeoman, Neil Owen, Caroline Jordan, Greg Adamson and Bin Xia
{"title":"An assessment of VOC emissions and human strength perception of liquid electric fragrance diffusers†","authors":"Thomas Warburton, Alastair C. Lewis, James R. Hopkins, Stephen J. Andrews, Amber M. Yeoman, Neil Owen, Caroline Jordan, Greg Adamson and Bin Xia","doi":"10.1039/D4VA00388H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Fragrance products are commonplace in everyday life and their air quality effects extensively studied. In this study the use of multiple plug-in diffusers (liquid electricals/LEs) was assessed by quantifying air concentrations in controlled test rooms (‘toilet booth’ and ‘large booth’) with up to 5 LEs of known formulation in concurrent use. Olfactive strength tests were completed under the same conditions in blind assessments. Air samples were analysed using thermal desorption – (TD) gas chromatography (GC) coupled to flame ionisation (FID) and mass spectrometry (MS) detectors. Significant positive linearities were found for several VOCs (<em>e.g.</em> α-pinene toilet booth and large booth <em>R</em> = 1 and <em>p</em> = 0.0028, <em>p</em>-cymene toilet booth <em>R</em> = 0.94 and <em>p</em> = 0.017, large booth <em>R</em> = 0.89 and <em>p</em> = 0.033), with α-pinene presenting the highest measurable gas-phase concentration (mean 25 μg m<small><sup>−3</sup></small>, toilet booth with 5 LEs present). All measurable linearities for fragrance species in toilet booths were significant. However, olfactive intensity assessment showed a plateauing in fragrance perception after the addition of 2 LEs. Only very volatile fragrance ingredients such as α-pinene and benzaldehyde could be detected in the gas phase, but at ambient concentrations that were always lower than literature values for their individual odour detection thresholds. The plateauing of the perception of fragrance strength may aid in limiting potential off-instruction use, thereby limiting end-user exposure to potentially high concentrations of emitted VOCs. The drivers of human fragrance perception here appeared to be lower vapour pressure constituents of fragrance formulations like sesquiterpenes. Moderation of the concentration of monoterpenes used in room fragrance formulations may be a practical solution in limiting possible air quality impacts of product use, whilst still maintaining end-user fragrance perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":72941,"journal":{"name":"Environmental science. Advances","volume":" 5","pages":" 739-752"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/va/d4va00388h?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental science. Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/va/d4va00388h","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fragrance products are commonplace in everyday life and their air quality effects extensively studied. In this study the use of multiple plug-in diffusers (liquid electricals/LEs) was assessed by quantifying air concentrations in controlled test rooms (‘toilet booth’ and ‘large booth’) with up to 5 LEs of known formulation in concurrent use. Olfactive strength tests were completed under the same conditions in blind assessments. Air samples were analysed using thermal desorption – (TD) gas chromatography (GC) coupled to flame ionisation (FID) and mass spectrometry (MS) detectors. Significant positive linearities were found for several VOCs (e.g. α-pinene toilet booth and large booth R = 1 and p = 0.0028, p-cymene toilet booth R = 0.94 and p = 0.017, large booth R = 0.89 and p = 0.033), with α-pinene presenting the highest measurable gas-phase concentration (mean 25 μg m−3, toilet booth with 5 LEs present). All measurable linearities for fragrance species in toilet booths were significant. However, olfactive intensity assessment showed a plateauing in fragrance perception after the addition of 2 LEs. Only very volatile fragrance ingredients such as α-pinene and benzaldehyde could be detected in the gas phase, but at ambient concentrations that were always lower than literature values for their individual odour detection thresholds. The plateauing of the perception of fragrance strength may aid in limiting potential off-instruction use, thereby limiting end-user exposure to potentially high concentrations of emitted VOCs. The drivers of human fragrance perception here appeared to be lower vapour pressure constituents of fragrance formulations like sesquiterpenes. Moderation of the concentration of monoterpenes used in room fragrance formulations may be a practical solution in limiting possible air quality impacts of product use, whilst still maintaining end-user fragrance perception.

挥发性有机化合物(VOC)排放与人对液体电香味扩散器强度感知的评价
香氛产品在日常生活中很常见,其对空气质量的影响也被广泛研究。在这项研究中,通过量化受控试验室(“厕所隔间”和“大隔间”)的空气浓度来评估多个插入式扩散器(液体电器/LEs)的使用情况,同时使用多达5个已知配方的LEs。嗅觉强度测试在相同的盲评条件下完成。空气样品分析使用热解吸(TD)气相色谱(GC)耦合火焰电离(FID)和质谱(MS)检测器。几种挥发性有机化合物(α-蒎烯卫生间和大型卫生间R = 1, p = 0.0028;对花枝烃卫生间R = 0.94, p = 0.017;大型卫生间R = 0.89, p = 0.033)均呈显著正线性关系,其中α-蒎烯的可测气相浓度最高(平均25 μg m−3,卫生间有5个挥发性有机化合物)。所有可测量的线性关系都是显著的。然而,嗅觉强度评估显示,添加2个LEs后,香味感知趋于平稳。只有非常挥发性的香味成分,如α-蒎烯和苯甲醛可以在气相中检测到,但环境浓度总是低于其单独气味检测阈值。对香味强度感知的稳定可能有助于限制潜在的非指示使用,从而限制最终用户暴露于潜在的高浓度挥发性有机化合物。在这里,人类对香味感知的驱动因素似乎是香水配方中蒸气压较低的成分,比如倍半萜。在室内香氛配方中使用单萜烯的浓度适度可能是限制产品使用对空气质量可能产生的影响的实际解决方案,同时仍然保持最终用户的香味感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信