Cross-section return dispersion and flow-performance sensitivity: Evidence from Chinese mutual fund

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Junhui Shan , Rui Xiang , Li Liu , Chaoyi Zhang , Ping Zhang
{"title":"Cross-section return dispersion and flow-performance sensitivity: Evidence from Chinese mutual fund","authors":"Junhui Shan ,&nbsp;Rui Xiang ,&nbsp;Li Liu ,&nbsp;Chaoyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Ping Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For actively managed equity mutual funds, cross-sectional return dispersion is inevitable. Cross-sectional return dispersion makes it more challenging for investors to assess managerial skills accurately. This study examines the impact of cross-sectional return dispersion on flow-performance sensitivity (FPS) with actively managed equity mutual funds from 2006 to 2020. Our findings reveal a significant negative impact of cross-section return dispersion on FPS, suggesting that unskilled managers may disguise their lack of skill more easily in the high-dispersion period. Furthermore, we also provide evidence that the traditional convex relationship between fund flows and performance cannot fully explain the influence of return dispersion. After controlling for flow-performance convexity, we find that the impact of dispersion on the FPS is greater in well-performing funds than in poor-performing ones. Star funds are more sensitive to dispersion compared to dog funds, which is consistent with the findings in flow-performance convexity. Moreover, the negative impact of dispersion on performance evaluation is more pronounced in bear markets or extreme market conditions, highly competitive funds, large-cap funds, actively managed funds, and individual investors. These findings enhance our understanding of how return dispersion shapes investor behavior and fund performance evaluation in actively managed mutual funds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48074,"journal":{"name":"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 102786"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X25001234","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For actively managed equity mutual funds, cross-sectional return dispersion is inevitable. Cross-sectional return dispersion makes it more challenging for investors to assess managerial skills accurately. This study examines the impact of cross-sectional return dispersion on flow-performance sensitivity (FPS) with actively managed equity mutual funds from 2006 to 2020. Our findings reveal a significant negative impact of cross-section return dispersion on FPS, suggesting that unskilled managers may disguise their lack of skill more easily in the high-dispersion period. Furthermore, we also provide evidence that the traditional convex relationship between fund flows and performance cannot fully explain the influence of return dispersion. After controlling for flow-performance convexity, we find that the impact of dispersion on the FPS is greater in well-performing funds than in poor-performing ones. Star funds are more sensitive to dispersion compared to dog funds, which is consistent with the findings in flow-performance convexity. Moreover, the negative impact of dispersion on performance evaluation is more pronounced in bear markets or extreme market conditions, highly competitive funds, large-cap funds, actively managed funds, and individual investors. These findings enhance our understanding of how return dispersion shapes investor behavior and fund performance evaluation in actively managed mutual funds.
横截面收益分散与流动绩效敏感性:来自中国共同基金的证据
对于积极管理的股票型共同基金来说,横截面收益分散是不可避免的。横截面收益分散使得投资者更难以准确地评估管理技能。本研究考察了2006年至2020年积极管理型股票共同基金的横截面收益分散对流动绩效敏感性(FPS)的影响。我们的研究结果揭示了截面回报分散对FPS的显著负面影响,这表明在高分散时期,不熟练的经理可能更容易掩饰他们缺乏技能。此外,我们还提供了证据,证明传统的资金流动与绩效之间的凸关系不能完全解释收益分散的影响。在控制了流动性能的凹凸性后,我们发现在业绩良好的基金中,分散对FPS的影响大于业绩较差的基金。与狗型基金相比,明星型基金对分散性更为敏感,这与流动-业绩凸性的研究结果一致。此外,在熊市或极端市场条件下、竞争激烈的基金、大盘股基金、积极管理型基金和个人投资者中,分散度对业绩评价的负面影响更为明显。这些发现增强了我们对收益分散如何影响积极管理共同基金的投资者行为和基金绩效评估的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: The Pacific-Basin Finance Journal is aimed at providing a specialized forum for the publication of academic research on capital markets of the Asia-Pacific countries. Primary emphasis will be placed on the highest quality empirical and theoretical research in the following areas: • Market Micro-structure; • Investment and Portfolio Management; • Theories of Market Equilibrium; • Valuation of Financial and Real Assets; • Behavior of Asset Prices in Financial Sectors; • Normative Theory of Financial Management; • Capital Markets of Development; • Market Mechanisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信