Declaring racism a public health crisis

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Claire Laurier Decoteau , Cal Lee Garrett , Tirza Ochrach-Konradi
{"title":"Declaring racism a public health crisis","authors":"Claire Laurier Decoteau ,&nbsp;Cal Lee Garrett ,&nbsp;Tirza Ochrach-Konradi","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since 2019, a growing number of local governments in the United States (US) have made declarations that racism is a public health crisis. These resolutions proliferated in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The resolutions recognize the conjunctural nature of racism in the US and institute organizational changes and new policies but often fail to implement meaningful change in racial and health inequalities on the ground. Comparing the cases of Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Chicago, Illinois and drawing on theories of biopower and stratified biomedicalization, this paper argues that these declarations instigate a shift in public health governance. Public health authority is expanded across multiple government domains, widening the scope of its jurisdiction and massifying the process of biomedicalization, combined with an economization of downstream programming by triaging resources via epidemiological metrics of vulnerability. Public health departments shift from providing services to becoming policy “strategists,” which entails efforts to reduce organizational bias and a devolution of programming to communities. As a result, the biomedicalization of racism through these declarations enables an uneven and intermittent public health response that fails to attend to the lived experience of racism on the ground.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"377 ","pages":"Article 118086"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2019, a growing number of local governments in the United States (US) have made declarations that racism is a public health crisis. These resolutions proliferated in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The resolutions recognize the conjunctural nature of racism in the US and institute organizational changes and new policies but often fail to implement meaningful change in racial and health inequalities on the ground. Comparing the cases of Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Chicago, Illinois and drawing on theories of biopower and stratified biomedicalization, this paper argues that these declarations instigate a shift in public health governance. Public health authority is expanded across multiple government domains, widening the scope of its jurisdiction and massifying the process of biomedicalization, combined with an economization of downstream programming by triaging resources via epidemiological metrics of vulnerability. Public health departments shift from providing services to becoming policy “strategists,” which entails efforts to reduce organizational bias and a devolution of programming to communities. As a result, the biomedicalization of racism through these declarations enables an uneven and intermittent public health response that fails to attend to the lived experience of racism on the ground.
宣布种族主义是公共健康危机
2019年以来,美国越来越多的地方政府宣布种族主义是一场公共卫生危机。在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后,这些决议激增。这些决议承认美国种族主义的偶合性,并制定了组织变革和新政策,但往往未能在种族和健康不平等方面实施有意义的变革。通过比较威斯康星州密尔沃基市和伊利诺伊州芝加哥市的案例,并借鉴生物权力和分层生物医学化理论,本文认为这些宣言引发了公共卫生治理的转变。公共卫生权力扩展到多个政府领域,扩大了其管辖范围,并使生物医学化进程大众化,同时通过流行病学脆弱性指标对资源进行分类,从而节约下游规划。公共卫生部门从提供服务转变为政策“战略家”,这需要努力减少组织偏见,并将规划工作下放给社区。因此,通过这些宣言对种族主义进行生物医学化,使得公共卫生反应不均衡、时断时合,未能顾及实地的种族主义生活经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信