Fertilization decreases microbial CUE via enhancing soil properties and microbial respiration in coal mine reclamation area

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Jinfeng Wang , Zhengming Luo , Jia Li , Jianhua Li , Minggang Xu
{"title":"Fertilization decreases microbial CUE via enhancing soil properties and microbial respiration in coal mine reclamation area","authors":"Jinfeng Wang ,&nbsp;Zhengming Luo ,&nbsp;Jia Li ,&nbsp;Jianhua Li ,&nbsp;Minggang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) is a pivotal parameter in regulating soil carbon cycling, however, the effects of different fertilization on microbial CUE in reclaimed soil and its key driving mechanisms remain unclear. To address this knowledge gap, a long-term trial was conducted to explore the differential characteristics of microbial CUE and its microbial mechanism in reclaimed soil under fertilization. Four treatments were included in the trials: 1) normal farmland (NL); 2) no fertilization (NF); 3) balanced mineral NPK fertilization (NPK); 4) NPK plus organic fertilizer (NPKM). Our results showed that both NPK and NPKM significantly decreased the microbial CUE by 29.6 % and 48.1 %, respectively, concurrently, significantly prolonged the microbial biomass turnover time. The microbial growth rates and growth quotient (qGrowth) in all treatments were significantly lower than respiration rates and respiratory quotient (qCO<sub>2</sub>) by an order of magnitude. Furthermore, the microbial growth rate in NF and NPKM were significantly lower than NL, and respiration rate in NPK and NPKM were significantly lower than NL. NPK and NPKM significantly enhanced soil particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon (POC and MAOC) contents relative to NF. In addition, NPK and NPKM also significantly increased the phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) concentrations of gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, aerobic bacteria and other bacterial groups, while only the fungal PLFA concentrations in NPKM were comparable to normal field levels. A significant positive correlation was found between microbial CUE and soil pH, as well as the ratio of microbial biomass carbon to nitrogen (MBC/MBN). Conversely, microbial CUE exhibited significant negative correlations with soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), MBC, and microbial PLFA. Microbial CUE also showed a negative correlation with qCO<sub>2</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.48, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) and MBC, POC, MAOC (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.39–0.64, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) in reclaimed soil. Random forest model (RFM) further identified MAOC, aerobic bacteria, MBN, TN, MBC/MBN, G<sup>+</sup> and SOC as the primary factors affecting microbial CUE. The Partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM) suggested that fertilization enhanced microbial respiration by improving soil properties, ultimately reducing microbial CUE in reclaimed soil. Overall, long-term application of NPK or NPKM reduced the microbial CUE via enhancing soil properties and microbial respiration in coal mine reclamation area, which also provide a theoretical basis for organic carbon sequestration in reclaimed soil.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 106145"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325002835","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) is a pivotal parameter in regulating soil carbon cycling, however, the effects of different fertilization on microbial CUE in reclaimed soil and its key driving mechanisms remain unclear. To address this knowledge gap, a long-term trial was conducted to explore the differential characteristics of microbial CUE and its microbial mechanism in reclaimed soil under fertilization. Four treatments were included in the trials: 1) normal farmland (NL); 2) no fertilization (NF); 3) balanced mineral NPK fertilization (NPK); 4) NPK plus organic fertilizer (NPKM). Our results showed that both NPK and NPKM significantly decreased the microbial CUE by 29.6 % and 48.1 %, respectively, concurrently, significantly prolonged the microbial biomass turnover time. The microbial growth rates and growth quotient (qGrowth) in all treatments were significantly lower than respiration rates and respiratory quotient (qCO2) by an order of magnitude. Furthermore, the microbial growth rate in NF and NPKM were significantly lower than NL, and respiration rate in NPK and NPKM were significantly lower than NL. NPK and NPKM significantly enhanced soil particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon (POC and MAOC) contents relative to NF. In addition, NPK and NPKM also significantly increased the phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) concentrations of gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, aerobic bacteria and other bacterial groups, while only the fungal PLFA concentrations in NPKM were comparable to normal field levels. A significant positive correlation was found between microbial CUE and soil pH, as well as the ratio of microbial biomass carbon to nitrogen (MBC/MBN). Conversely, microbial CUE exhibited significant negative correlations with soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), MBC, and microbial PLFA. Microbial CUE also showed a negative correlation with qCO2 (R2 = 0.48, P < 0.01) and MBC, POC, MAOC (R2 = 0.39–0.64, P < 0.05) in reclaimed soil. Random forest model (RFM) further identified MAOC, aerobic bacteria, MBN, TN, MBC/MBN, G+ and SOC as the primary factors affecting microbial CUE. The Partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM) suggested that fertilization enhanced microbial respiration by improving soil properties, ultimately reducing microbial CUE in reclaimed soil. Overall, long-term application of NPK or NPKM reduced the microbial CUE via enhancing soil properties and microbial respiration in coal mine reclamation area, which also provide a theoretical basis for organic carbon sequestration in reclaimed soil.
在煤矿复垦区,施肥通过提高土壤性质和微生物呼吸来降低微生物CUE
微生物碳利用效率(CUE)是调控土壤碳循环的关键参数,但不同施肥方式对复垦土壤微生物碳利用效率的影响及其关键驱动机制尚不清楚。为了解决这一知识空白,进行了一项长期试验,探讨施肥条件下复垦土壤微生物CUE的差异特征及其微生物机制。试验包括4个处理:1)正常农田(NL);2)不施肥(NF);3)平衡矿物氮磷钾施肥(NPK);4)氮磷钾加有机肥(NPKM)。结果表明,NPK和NPKM分别显著降低了29.6%和48.1%的微生物CUE,同时显著延长了微生物生物量周转时间。各处理的微生物生长速率和生长商(qGrowth)均显著低于呼吸速率和呼吸商(qCO2)一个数量级。氮磷钾和氮磷钾中微生物生长速率显著低于氮磷钾,而氮磷钾和氮磷钾中的呼吸速率显著低于氮磷钾。NPK和NPKM显著提高了土壤颗粒碳和矿物相关有机碳(POC和MAOC)含量。此外,NPK和NPKM还显著提高了革兰氏阳性菌、革兰氏阴性菌、好氧菌和其他菌群的磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)浓度,但NPKM中只有真菌的PLFA浓度与田间正常水平相当。微生物CUE与土壤pH、微生物生物量碳氮比(MBC/MBN)呈显著正相关。相反,微生物CUE与土壤有机碳(SOC)、全氮(TN)、全磷(TP)、速效氮(AN)、速效磷(AP)、速效钾(AK)、MBC和微生物PLFA呈显著负相关。微生物CUE与qCO2也呈负相关(R2 = 0.48, P <;0.01)、MBC、POC、MAOC (R2 = 0.39 ~ 0.64, P <;0.05)。随机森林模型(RFM)进一步发现,MAOC、好氧菌、MBN、TN、MBC/MBN、G+和SOC是影响微生物CUE的主要因素。偏最小二乘路径模型(PLS-PM)表明,施肥通过改善土壤性质来增强微生物呼吸,最终降低复垦土壤微生物CUE。总体而言,长期施用氮磷钾或氮磷钾可通过改善复垦区土壤性质和微生物呼吸来降低微生物CUE,这也为复垦土壤固碳提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信