Real estate for fusion: An anatomical comparison of surface area between cervical facet joints and the intervertebral disc space

IF 2 Q1 Medicine
Christopher Seidel , Clifford Pierre , Luke Jouppi , Luke DiPasquale , Chelsea Bush , Anna Anderson , Amit R. Patel
{"title":"Real estate for fusion: An anatomical comparison of surface area between cervical facet joints and the intervertebral disc space","authors":"Christopher Seidel ,&nbsp;Clifford Pierre ,&nbsp;Luke Jouppi ,&nbsp;Luke DiPasquale ,&nbsp;Chelsea Bush ,&nbsp;Anna Anderson ,&nbsp;Amit R. Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.wnsx.2025.100473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cervical stenosis may be treated surgically with anterior or posterior decompression with or without fixation. Recently, facet fusion using implantable devices using a posterior approach has been described as an alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). To our knowledge, no anatomic studies have compared the surface area of the cervical facet joints to the intervertebral space. This study sought to provide a better understanding of the potential surface areas for arthrodesis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a cross-sectional retrospective review using CT scans of the cervical spine in patients who had undergone imaging between 2014 and 2017. Using our institution's imaging software, we measured the area contained within the intervertebral space and the facet joints bilaterally. All surface area values for each intervertebral space were then compared using a paired <em>t</em>-test to the cumulative surface area of the facet joints calculated at each level.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two hundred twelve patients (120 male, 92 female) were eligible for the analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean age was 33 ± 6.0 years (range 18–55). The mean BMI was 29 ± 7.2 (range 19–58). In each of the comparisons, the combined intra-facet joint surface area (IFSA) was significantly greater than the intervertebral surface area (IVSA) of the corresponding interbody space.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The surface area between the combined facet joints was almost two times greater than the intervertebral space. This may help establish an anatomic basis for comparable fusion results between the traditional ACDF and posterior fusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37134,"journal":{"name":"World Neurosurgery: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Neurosurgery: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259013972500047X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Cervical stenosis may be treated surgically with anterior or posterior decompression with or without fixation. Recently, facet fusion using implantable devices using a posterior approach has been described as an alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). To our knowledge, no anatomic studies have compared the surface area of the cervical facet joints to the intervertebral space. This study sought to provide a better understanding of the potential surface areas for arthrodesis.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional retrospective review using CT scans of the cervical spine in patients who had undergone imaging between 2014 and 2017. Using our institution's imaging software, we measured the area contained within the intervertebral space and the facet joints bilaterally. All surface area values for each intervertebral space were then compared using a paired t-test to the cumulative surface area of the facet joints calculated at each level.

Results

Two hundred twelve patients (120 male, 92 female) were eligible for the analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean age was 33 ± 6.0 years (range 18–55). The mean BMI was 29 ± 7.2 (range 19–58). In each of the comparisons, the combined intra-facet joint surface area (IFSA) was significantly greater than the intervertebral surface area (IVSA) of the corresponding interbody space.

Conclusion

The surface area between the combined facet joints was almost two times greater than the intervertebral space. This may help establish an anatomic basis for comparable fusion results between the traditional ACDF and posterior fusion.
融合的空间:颈椎小关节和椎间盘间隙间表面面积的解剖比较
颈椎狭窄可通过前路或后路减压手术治疗,有或无固定。最近,采用后路植入式装置进行关节突融合已被描述为颈前路椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)的替代方法。据我们所知,没有解剖研究比较过颈椎小关节的表面积和椎间隙。本研究旨在更好地了解关节融合术的潜在表面积。方法我们对2014年至2017年期间接受过影像学检查的患者进行了颈椎CT扫描的横断面回顾性研究。使用我们机构的成像软件,我们测量了双侧椎间隙和小关节内的面积。然后使用配对t检验将每个椎间隙的所有表面积值与每个水平计算的小关节累积表面积进行比较。结果122例患者(男120例,女92例)符合纳入和排除标准。平均年龄33±6.0岁(18 ~ 55岁)。平均BMI为29±7.2(范围19-58)。在每个比较中,关节突内关节表面积(IFSA)明显大于相应椎间间隙的椎间表面积(IVSA)。结论关节突关节间关节面面积约为椎间隙的2倍。这可能有助于为比较传统ACDF和后路融合的融合结果建立解剖学基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Neurosurgery: X
World Neurosurgery: X Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
44 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信