Five-year assessment of multiple inter-tillage weeding on greenhouse gas emissions, rice yield, and carbon balance in organic rice farming in Hokkaido, Japan

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hiyori Namie , Kasane Shimada , Shuangshuang Zhao , Kaho Sakaguchi , Yo Toma , Munehide Ishiguro , Ryusuke Hatano
{"title":"Five-year assessment of multiple inter-tillage weeding on greenhouse gas emissions, rice yield, and carbon balance in organic rice farming in Hokkaido, Japan","authors":"Hiyori Namie ,&nbsp;Kasane Shimada ,&nbsp;Shuangshuang Zhao ,&nbsp;Kaho Sakaguchi ,&nbsp;Yo Toma ,&nbsp;Munehide Ishiguro ,&nbsp;Ryusuke Hatano","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional multiple inter-tillage weeding (MIW) is believed to improve rice yield and anaerobic soil conditions, reducing methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions and enhancing carbon sequestration. However, as global climate change accelerates and necessitates sustainable organic rice farming, the effects of MIW on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and carbon balance remain unclear. This study investigated whether MIW decreases CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, lowers global warming potential (GWP), reduces GHG intensity (GHGI) through higher yields, and enhances carbon sequestration. Field experiments were conducted in Hokkaido, Japan (2019–2023), performing MIW 0, 2, or 5 times (T0/T2/T5) without fertilizers or agrochemicals. Subsequently, we determined the GHG balance (GHGB) and net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB), measured soil temperature, redox potential (Eh), and physicochemical properties, and GHG emissions, using the closed chamber method. GHGB values were positive, indicating emissions, in the order T0 &lt; T5 &lt; T2 (30.2, 44.9, 48.0 Mg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq ha<sup>−1</sup>). NECB values were negative, indicating a loss, in the order T2 &lt; T5 &lt; T0 (-10.3, −7.96, −5.42 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>). Contrary to our hypothesis, MIW increased CO<sub>2</sub> (heterotrophic respiration (RH)) and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, elevating GHG emissions and carbon loss risk. However, T5 showed the lowest GHGI, suggesting improved yield efficiency. To mitigate MIW-induced carbon loss and GHG risks, the adoption of slow-decomposing organic amendments, such as biochar, or adjusting water management practices is recommended. These strategies could enhance the potential of MIW for sustainable organic rice farming. Our findings highlight the urgent need for improved MIW practices to balance yield gains and mitigate climate change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"389 ","pages":"Article 109718"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925002506","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional multiple inter-tillage weeding (MIW) is believed to improve rice yield and anaerobic soil conditions, reducing methane (CH4) emissions and enhancing carbon sequestration. However, as global climate change accelerates and necessitates sustainable organic rice farming, the effects of MIW on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and carbon balance remain unclear. This study investigated whether MIW decreases CH4 emissions, lowers global warming potential (GWP), reduces GHG intensity (GHGI) through higher yields, and enhances carbon sequestration. Field experiments were conducted in Hokkaido, Japan (2019–2023), performing MIW 0, 2, or 5 times (T0/T2/T5) without fertilizers or agrochemicals. Subsequently, we determined the GHG balance (GHGB) and net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB), measured soil temperature, redox potential (Eh), and physicochemical properties, and GHG emissions, using the closed chamber method. GHGB values were positive, indicating emissions, in the order T0 < T5 < T2 (30.2, 44.9, 48.0 Mg CO2-eq ha−1). NECB values were negative, indicating a loss, in the order T2 < T5 < T0 (-10.3, −7.96, −5.42 Mg C ha−1). Contrary to our hypothesis, MIW increased CO2 (heterotrophic respiration (RH)) and CH4 emissions, elevating GHG emissions and carbon loss risk. However, T5 showed the lowest GHGI, suggesting improved yield efficiency. To mitigate MIW-induced carbon loss and GHG risks, the adoption of slow-decomposing organic amendments, such as biochar, or adjusting water management practices is recommended. These strategies could enhance the potential of MIW for sustainable organic rice farming. Our findings highlight the urgent need for improved MIW practices to balance yield gains and mitigate climate change.
多次间作除草对日本北海道有机水稻种植温室气体排放、产量和碳平衡的五年评估
传统的多次间作除草(MIW)可以提高水稻产量,改善厌氧土壤条件,减少甲烷(CH4)排放,增强碳固存。然而,随着全球气候变化的加速和可持续有机水稻种植的必要性,MIW对温室气体(GHG)排放和碳平衡的影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨了MIW是否能减少CH4排放,降低全球变暖潜能值(GWP),通过提高产量降低GHG强度(GHGI),并增强碳固存。2019-2023年在日本北海道进行了田间试验,在不使用化肥和农药的情况下,进行了0、2或5次MIW (T0/T2/T5)试验。随后,我们采用密闭室法测定了温室气体平衡(GHGB)和净生态系统碳平衡(NECB),测量了土壤温度、氧化还原电位(Eh)、理化性质和温室气体排放。GHGB值为正,表示排放,其顺序为T0 <; T5 <; T2 (30.2, 44.9, 48.0 Mg CO2-eq ha−1)。NECB值为负,表明损失,顺序为T2 <; T5 <; T0 (-10.3, - 7.96, - 5.42 Mg C ha -1)。与我们的假设相反,MIW增加了CO2(异养呼吸(RH))和CH4排放,增加了温室气体排放和碳损失风险。而T5的GHGI最低,表明产量效率有所提高。为了减轻miw引起的碳损失和温室气体风险,建议采用缓慢分解的有机改良剂,如生物炭,或调整水管理做法。这些策略可以提高MIW在可持续有机水稻种植方面的潜力。我们的研究结果强调,迫切需要改进MIW实践,以平衡产量增长和减缓气候变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信